Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Alabama opinions name it 2 courts 1986–2012 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hill v. Stategreen2 sentences2003See, generally, Hill v. State, 507 So.2d 554, 555 (Ala.Crim.App.1986) ("expert testimony concerning a scientific or medical principle will be admissible only when the proponent of the evidence establishes that the principle has achieved general acceptance in the scientific field to which it belongs"); see also Hoosier v. State, 612 So.2d 1352, 1353 (Ala.Crim.App. 1992). 2003See, generally, Hill v. State, 507 So.2d 554, 555 (Ala.Crim.App.1986) (“expert testimony concerning a scientific or medical principle will be admissible only when the proponent of the evidence establishes that the principle has achieved general acceptance in the scientific field to which it belongs”); see also Hoosier v. State, 612 So.2d 1352, 1353 (Ala.Crim.App.1992). | 2 | 3 |
Hoosier v. Stategreen2 sentences2003See, generally, Hill v. State, 507 So.2d 554, 555 (Ala.Crim.App.1986) ("expert testimony concerning a scientific or medical principle will be admissible only when the proponent of the evidence establishes that the principle has achieved general acceptance in the scientific field to which it belongs"); see also Hoosier v. State, 612 So.2d 1352, 1353 (Ala.Crim.App. 1992). 2003See, generally, Hill v. State, 507 So.2d 554, 555 (Ala.Crim.App.1986) (“expert testimony concerning a scientific or medical principle will be admissible only when the proponent of the evidence establishes that the principle has achieved general acceptance in the scientific field to which it belongs”); see also Hoosier v. State, 612 So.2d 1352, 1353 (Ala.Crim.App.1992). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Adams v. State
green
2 sentences2012Adams v. State, 484 So.2d 1143 (Ala.Cr.Ápp.1985); Prewitt v. State, 460 So.2d 296 (Ala.Cr.App.1984); Dyas v. United States, 376 A.2d 827 (D.C.C.A.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 973 , 98 S.Ct. 529 , 54 L.Ed.2d 464 (1977); McCormick on Evidence, § 13 p. 31 (2d ed.1972). 1992Adams v. State , 484 So.2d 1143 (Ala.Cr.App. 1985); Prewitt v. State , 460 So.2d 296 (Ala.Cr.App. 1984); Dyas v. United States , 376 A.2d 827 (D.C.C.A. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 973 , 98 S.Ct. 529 , 54 L.Ed.2d 464 (1977); McCormick on Evidence, § 13 p. 31 (2d ed. 1972)." Hill v. State , 507 So.2d 554 , 555 (Ala.Cr.App. 1986), cert. denied, 507 So.2d 558 (Ala. 1987), concerned the admissibility of evidence of the "battered wife syndrome." In his concurrence in Hill , with which the Alabama Supreme Court agreed, Judge Bowen stated that expert opinion testimony on the battered wife syndrome m | 3 | 1986–2012 |
Dyas v. United States
green
2 sentences2012Adams v. State, 484 So.2d 1143 (Ala.Cr.Ápp.1985); Prewitt v. State, 460 So.2d 296 (Ala.Cr.App.1984); Dyas v. United States, 376 A.2d 827 (D.C.C.A.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 973 , 98 S.Ct. 529 , 54 L.Ed.2d 464 (1977); McCormick on Evidence, § 13 p. 31 (2d ed.1972). 2012Adams v. State, 484 So.2d 1143 (Ala.Cr.Ápp.1985); Prewitt v. State, 460 So.2d 296 (Ala.Cr.App.1984); Dyas v. United States, 376 A.2d 827 (D.C.C.A.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 973 , 98 S.Ct. 529 , 54 L.Ed.2d 464 (1977); McCormick on Evidence, § 13 p. 31 (2d ed.1972). | 3 | 1986–2012 |
Dyas v. United States
green
2 sentences2012Adams v. State, 484 So.2d 1143 (Ala.Cr.Ápp.1985); Prewitt v. State, 460 So.2d 296 (Ala.Cr.App.1984); Dyas v. United States, 376 A.2d 827 (D.C.C.A.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 973 , 98 S.Ct. 529 , 54 L.Ed.2d 464 (1977); McCormick on Evidence, § 13 p. 31 (2d ed.1972). 1992Adams v. State , 484 So.2d 1143 (Ala.Cr.App. 1985); Prewitt v. State , 460 So.2d 296 (Ala.Cr.App. 1984); Dyas v. United States , 376 A.2d 827 (D.C.C.A. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 973 , 98 S.Ct. 529 , 54 L.Ed.2d 464 (1977); McCormick on Evidence, § 13 p. 31 (2d ed. 1972)." Hill v. State , 507 So.2d 554 , 555 (Ala.Cr.App. 1986), cert. denied, 507 So.2d 558 (Ala. 1987), concerned the admissibility of evidence of the "battered wife syndrome." In his concurrence in Hill , with which the Alabama Supreme Court agreed, Judge Bowen stated that expert opinion testimony on the battered wife syndrome m | 3 | 1986–2012 |
Prewitt v. State
green
2 sentences2012Adams v. State, 484 So.2d 1143 (Ala.Cr.Ápp.1985); Prewitt v. State, 460 So.2d 296 (Ala.Cr.App.1984); Dyas v. United States, 376 A.2d 827 (D.C.C.A.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 973 , 98 S.Ct. 529 , 54 L.Ed.2d 464 (1977); McCormick on Evidence, § 13 p. 31 (2d ed.1972). 1992Adams v. State , 484 So.2d 1143 (Ala.Cr.App. 1985); Prewitt v. State , 460 So.2d 296 (Ala.Cr.App. 1984); Dyas v. United States , 376 A.2d 827 (D.C.C.A. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 973 , 98 S.Ct. 529 , 54 L.Ed.2d 464 (1977); McCormick on Evidence, § 13 p. 31 (2d ed. 1972)." Hill v. State , 507 So.2d 554 , 555 (Ala.Cr.App. 1986), cert. denied, 507 So.2d 558 (Ala. 1987), concerned the admissibility of evidence of the "battered wife syndrome." In his concurrence in Hill , with which the Alabama Supreme Court agreed, Judge Bowen stated that expert opinion testimony on the battered wife syndrome m | 3 | 1986–2012 |
Ex Parte Hill
green
1 sentence1992Adams v. State , 484 So.2d 1143 (Ala.Cr.App. 1985); Prewitt v. State , 460 So.2d 296 (Ala.Cr.App. 1984); Dyas v. United States , 376 A.2d 827 (D.C.C.A. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 973 , 98 S.Ct. 529 , 54 L.Ed.2d 464 (1977); McCormick on Evidence, § 13 p. 31 (2d ed. 1972)." Hill v. State , 507 So.2d 554 , 555 (Ala.Cr.App. 1986), cert. denied, 507 So.2d 558 (Ala. 1987), concerned the admissibility of evidence of the "battered wife syndrome." In his concurrence in Hill , with which the Alabama Supreme Court agreed, Judge Bowen stated that expert opinion testimony on the battered wife syndrome m | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Frye v. United States
red
1 sentence1992Frye v. United States , 293 F. 1013 (D.C. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.