Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Alabama opinions name it 3 courts 1982–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Cameron v. Stategreen1 sentence2026See Cameron v. State, 615 So. 2d 121, 124 (Ala. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Cash v. Caldwellgreen2 sentences1995Cash v. Caldwell, 603 So.2d 1001, 1004 (Ala.1992). 1995Cash v. Caldwell , 603 So.2d 1001 , 1004 (Ala. 1992). | 1 | 1 |
Brown v. Parnellgreen1 sentence1988See Brown v. Parnell, 386 So.2d 1137 (Ala.1980); Gosnell v. Slaughter, 364 So.2d 1158 (Ala. 1978); Jordan v. Empiregas, Inc. of Belle Mina, 337 So.2d 732 (Ala.1976); Ramsey v. Leath, 706 F.2d 1166 (11th Cir.1983). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Schneider Moving & Storage Co. v. Robbins
green
2 sentences2010Hughes relies on Schneider Moving & Storage Co. v. Robbins, 466 U.S. 364 , 104 S.Ct. 1844 , 80 L.Ed.2d 366 (1984), and argues that “ ‘[w]here the language of the contract, or the circumstances under which it was executed, establish that the parties have provided that the right of the beneficiary is not to be affected by any defenses that the promisor might have against the promisee, the rule is inapplicable.’” (Hughes’s brief, at 44) (quoting Schneider, 466 U.S. at 371 , 104 S.Ct. 1844 ). 2010Hughes relies on Schneider Moving & Storage Co. v. Robbins, 466 U.S. 364 , 104 S.Ct. 1844 , 80 L.Ed.2d 366 (1984), and argues that “ ‘[w]here the language of the contract, or the circumstances under which it was executed, establish that the parties have provided that the right of the beneficiary is not to be affected by any defenses that the promisor might have against the promisee, the rule is inapplicable.’” (Hughes’s brief, at 44) (quoting Schneider, 466 U.S. at 371 , 104 S.Ct. 1844 ). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
George v. Champion Ins. Co.
green
1 sentence1995Dorman v. Jackson , 623 So.2d 1056 (Ala. 1993); George, supra , Clearly, Anderson made a prima facie showing that there was no genuine issue of material fact regarding wantonness, i.e., "that she had not acted wantonly or willfully," and that she was entitled to a judgment as a matter of law on Hughes's claim under the guest statute. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Dorman v. Jackson
green
1 sentence1995Dorman v. Jackson , 623 So.2d 1056 (Ala. 1993); George, supra , Clearly, Anderson made a prima facie showing that there was no genuine issue of material fact regarding wantonness, i.e., "that she had not acted wantonly or willfully," and that she was entitled to a judgment as a matter of law on Hughes's claim under the guest statute. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Gordon v. Hailey and Bumpass, Contractors, Inc.
neutral
2 sentences1992Although this order was entered 92 days after Hughes's motion was filed on September 20, 1990, the December 21 order was not untimely, because the parties had expressly consented to an extension of time under Rule 59.1. [5] But see Deason v. Alpine Coal Co., 22 Ala.App. 254 , 114 So. 423 (1927); May v. Dothan Buick Co., 243 Ala. 37 , 8 So.2d 448 (1942); Gordon v. Hailey & Bumpass, Contractors, Inc. 273 Ala. 254 , 139 So.2d 296 (1962). 1992Although this order was entered 92 days after Hughes's motion was filed on September 20, 1990, the December 21 order was not untimely, because the parties had expressly consented to an extension of time under Rule 59.1. [5] But see Deason v. Alpine Coal Co., 22 Ala.App. 254 , 114 So. 423 (1927); May v. Dothan Buick Co., 243 Ala. 37 , 8 So.2d 448 (1942); Gordon v. Hailey & Bumpass, Contractors, Inc. 273 Ala. 254 , 139 So.2d 296 (1962). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Mimms v. State
green
1 sentence1992Although this order was entered 92 days after Hughes's motion was filed on September 20, 1990, the December 21 order was not untimely, because the parties had expressly consented to an extension of time under Rule 59.1. [5] But see Deason v. Alpine Coal Co., 22 Ala.App. 254 , 114 So. 423 (1927); May v. Dothan Buick Co., 243 Ala. 37 , 8 So.2d 448 (1942); Gordon v. Hailey & Bumpass, Contractors, Inc. 273 Ala. 254 , 139 So.2d 296 (1962). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Sams v. Sams
neutral
1 sentence1992Although this order was entered 92 days after Hughes's motion was filed on September 20, 1990, the December 21 order was not untimely, because the parties had expressly consented to an extension of time under Rule 59.1. [5] But see Deason v. Alpine Coal Co., 22 Ala.App. 254 , 114 So. 423 (1927); May v. Dothan Buick Co., 243 Ala. 37 , 8 So.2d 448 (1942); Gordon v. Hailey & Bumpass, Contractors, Inc. 273 Ala. 254 , 139 So.2d 296 (1962). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Deason v. Alpine Coal Co.
green
1 sentence1992Although this order was entered 92 days after Hughes's motion was filed on September 20, 1990, the December 21 order was not untimely, because the parties had expressly consented to an extension of time under Rule 59.1. [5] But see Deason v. Alpine Coal Co., 22 Ala.App. 254 , 114 So. 423 (1927); May v. Dothan Buick Co., 243 Ala. 37 , 8 So.2d 448 (1942); Gordon v. Hailey & Bumpass, Contractors, Inc. 273 Ala. 254 , 139 So.2d 296 (1962). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
May v. Dothan Buick Co.
neutral
1 sentence1992Although this order was entered 92 days after Hughes's motion was filed on September 20, 1990, the December 21 order was not untimely, because the parties had expressly consented to an extension of time under Rule 59.1. [5] But see Deason v. Alpine Coal Co., 22 Ala.App. 254 , 114 So. 423 (1927); May v. Dothan Buick Co., 243 Ala. 37 , 8 So.2d 448 (1942); Gordon v. Hailey & Bumpass, Contractors, Inc. 273 Ala. 254 , 139 So.2d 296 (1962). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Jordan v. Empiregas, Inc. of Belle Mina
green
1 sentence1988See Brown v. Parnell, 386 So.2d 1137 (Ala.1980); Gosnell v. Slaughter, 364 So.2d 1158 (Ala. 1978); Jordan v. Empiregas, Inc. of Belle Mina, 337 So.2d 732 (Ala.1976); Ramsey v. Leath, 706 F.2d 1166 (11th Cir.1983). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
William C. Ramsey and Johnny Ray King, Cross-Appellees v. James T. Leath, Dan Chandler and George Daly, Cross-Appellants
green
1 sentence1988See Brown v. Parnell, 386 So.2d 1137 (Ala.1980); Gosnell v. Slaughter, 364 So.2d 1158 (Ala. 1978); Jordan v. Empiregas, Inc. of Belle Mina, 337 So.2d 732 (Ala.1976); Ramsey v. Leath, 706 F.2d 1166 (11th Cir.1983). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Gosnell v. Slaughter
neutral
1 sentence1988See Brown v. Parnell, 386 So.2d 1137 (Ala.1980); Gosnell v. Slaughter, 364 So.2d 1158 (Ala. 1978); Jordan v. Empiregas, Inc. of Belle Mina, 337 So.2d 732 (Ala.1976); Ramsey v. Leath, 706 F.2d 1166 (11th Cir.1983). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Hughes v. JEFFERSON CTY. BD. OF ED.
green
2 sentences1982Indeed, the "reasonable basis" spoken of in Hughes, supra , is clearly met in Chief Moseley's stated purpose to develop additional criteria for the selection of the district fire chief — that is, the upgrading of the fire department personnel as a whole. 1982Indeed, the "reasonable basis" spoken of in Hughes, supra , is clearly met in Chief Moseley's stated purpose to develop additional criteria for the selection of the district fire chief — that is, the upgrading of the fire department personnel as a whole. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.