Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Arkansas opinions name it 3 courts 1981–1996 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
McCambridge v. City of Little Rockgreen2 sentences1996I believe a privacy claim in this context would most likely be approached under a constitutional right to privacy, the test for which is delineated in the case of McCambridge v. City of Little Rock, 298 Ark. 219 , 766 S.W.2d 909 (1989). 1996I believe a privacy claim in this context would most likely be approached under a constitutional right to privacy, the test for which is delineated in the case of McCambridge v. City of Little Rock, 298 Ark. 219 , 766 S.W.2d 909 (1989). | 2 | 3 |
Slevin v. City of New Yorkgreen1 sentence1992See Slevin, supra at 920 and n. 3. (". . . while virtually every court that has considered financial disclosure laws has stated that the Constitution shields individual and family privacy as to financial matters, few courts have placed constitutional limits of any sort on legislatures requiring financial disclosures and providing that they be available to the public.") 1 With regard to the privacy analysis, a pro-disclosure balance has been reached, following intermediate scrutiny or a balancing approach. | 1 | 1 |
cluster 422035green1 sentence1992See Slevin and Barry, supra. The governmental interest in revealing and deterring corruption and conflicts of interest has generally been held to outweigh the possible infringement of the individual's privacy interests. | 1 | 1 |
Smith v. Marylandred1 sentence1981See Smith v. Maryland, 442 U.S. 735, 740 (1979)._ The Arkansas Supreme Court, however, has not expressly mentioned the privacy standard enunciated in Katz in any of the open field cases it has decided since 1967. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Whalen v. Roe
green
1 sentence1989This material consequently meets the privacy test as stated in Whalen v. Roe, supra. Death has sealed the lips of John Markle and his wife and children. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Dean v. Superior Court
green
2 sentences1981We held on appeal that the defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the wooded area behind his apartment and it was not within the purview of one’s “curtilage” as defined in Sanders v. State, supra. In Dean v. Superior Court for County of Nevada, 35 Cal. App. 3d 112 , 110 Cal. Rptr. 585 (1973), the court, in considering the Hester open field doctrine and the privacy standard in Katz, stated: A generalized expression of Fourth Amendment doctrine usually excludes ‘open fields’ from the scope of constitutional protection. ... 1981We held on appeal that the defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the wooded area behind his apartment and it was not within the purview of one’s “curtilage” as defined in Sanders v. State, supra. In Dean v. Superior Court for County of Nevada, 35 Cal. App. 3d 112 , 110 Cal. Rptr. 585 (1973), the court, in considering the Hester open field doctrine and the privacy standard in Katz, stated: A generalized expression of Fourth Amendment doctrine usually excludes ‘open fields’ from the scope of constitutional protection. ... | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.