record for any arguable claim (Arkansas) · Go Syfert
← Arkansas issues

record for any arguable claim in Arkansas

7 Arkansas opinions name it 2 courts 2001–2019 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
McCoy v. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District 1green
scotus · 1988 · cited in 4 Arkansas opinions naming this issue, 2001–2015
2 sentences

2015First, the court “must satisfy itself that the attorney has provided the client with a diligent and | ¿thorough search of the record for any arguable claim that might support the clients appeal.” Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988) (citing McCoy, 486 U.S. at 442 , 108 S.Ct. 1895 ).

2015First, the court “must satisfy itself that the attorney has provided the client with a diligent and | ¿thorough search of the record for any arguable claim that might support the clients appeal.” Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988) (citing McCoy, 486 U.S. at 442 , 108 S.Ct. 1895 ).

24
Penson v. Ohiogreen
scotus · 1988 · cited in 5 Arkansas opinions naming this issue, 2010–2019
2 sentences

2018Filing an Anders brief is permissible only when an attorney has provided the client with a diligent and thorough search of the record for any arguable claim that might support the client's appeal, and after having identified all of the potential adverse rulings, the attorney determines that an appeal from those rulings would be "frivolous." Kou Her v. State , 2015 Ark. 91 at 8-9, 457 S.W.3d 659 , 664 (citing Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988) ).

2018Filing an Anders brief is permissible only when an attorney has provided the client with a diligent and thorough search of the record for any arguable claim that might support the client's appeal, and after having identified all of the potential adverse rulings, the attorney determines that an appeal from those rulings would be "frivolous." Kou Her v. State , 2015 Ark. 91 at 8-9, 457 S.W.3d 659 , 664 (citing Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988) ).

15
Kou Her v. Stategreen
ark · 2015 · cited in 3 Arkansas opinions naming this issue, 2015–2018
2 sentences

2018Filing an Anders brief is permissible only when an attorney has provided the client with a diligent and thorough search of the record for any arguable claim that might support the client's appeal, and after having identified all of the potential adverse rulings, the attorney determines that an appeal from those rulings would be "frivolous." Kou Her v. State , 2015 Ark. 91 at 8-9, 457 S.W.3d 659 , 664 (citing Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988) ).

2018Filing an Anders brief is permissible only when an attorney has provided the client with a diligent and thorough search of the record for any arguable claim that might support the client's appeal, and after having identified all of the potential adverse rulings, the attorney determines that an appeal from those rulings would be "frivolous." Kou Her v. State , 2015 Ark. 91 at 8-9, 457 S.W.3d 659 , 664 (citing Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988) ).

13

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
Sartin v. State green
ark · 2010
2 sentences

2019Sartin v. State, 2010 Ark. 16, at 3 , 362 S.W.3d 877 , 879–80 (citing Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988)).

2019Sartin v. State, 2010 Ark. 16, at 3 , 362 S.W.3d 877 , 879–80 (citing Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988)).

12019–2019

Where else courts name it

TX 83 (1994–2024) NY 59 (2011–2026) AR 7 (2001–2019) CA 3 (1995–1996) OR 3 (1991–2025) AZ 2 (2012–2017)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check