Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Arizona opinions name it 2 courts 2006–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State of Arizona v. George Benjamin Laringreen2 sentences2015See State v. La-rin, 233 Ariz. 202, ¶ 17 , 310 P.3d 990, 996 (App.2013) (no error where evidence did not support lesser-ineluded offense instruction). 10 Criminal Restitution Order ¶ 20 Although not mentioned in the parties’ briefs, we find fundamental, prejudicial error in the court’s imposition of a CRO. 2015See State v. La-rin, 233 Ariz. 202, ¶ 17 , 310 P.3d 990, 996 (App.2013) (no error where evidence did not support lesser-ineluded offense instruction). 10 Criminal Restitution Order ¶ 20 Although not mentioned in the parties’ briefs, we find fundamental, prejudicial error in the court’s imposition of a CRO. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Bearupgreen2 sentences2011“To determine whether sufficient evidence existed to require a lesser-ineluded offense instruction, [we] must examine whether the jury could rationally fail to find the distinguishing element of the greater offense.” State v. Bearup, 221 Ariz. 163 , 168 ¶ 23, 211 P.3d 684, 689 (2009) (internal quotation marks omitted). ¶ 24 Delahanty was convicted under A.R.S. § 13-1105(A)(3), which provides that a person commits first degree murder if, “[intending or knowing that the person’s conduct will cause death to a law enforcement officer, the person causes the death of a law enforcement officer who is 2011“To determine whether sufficient evidence existed to require a lesser-ineluded offense instruction, [we] must examine whether the jury could rationally fail to find the distinguishing element of the greater offense.” State v. Bearup, 221 Ariz. 163 , 168 ¶ 23, 211 P.3d 684, 689 (2009) (internal quotation marks omitted). ¶ 24 Delahanty was convicted under A.R.S. § 13-1105(A)(3), which provides that a person commits first degree murder if, “[intending or knowing that the person’s conduct will cause death to a law enforcement officer, the person causes the death of a law enforcement officer who is | 1 | 1 |
State v. Andrianoyellow2 sentences2009State v. Andriano, 215 Ariz. 497, 504, ¶ 32 , 161 P.3d 540, 547 (2007). 2009State v. Andriano, 215 Ariz. 497, 504, ¶ 32 , 161 P.3d 540, 547 (2007). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Fishgreen2 sentences2009State v. Fish, 222 Ariz. 109, 132, ¶¶ 79-81 , 213 P.3d 258, 281 (App.2009). 2009State v. Fish, 222 Ariz. 109, 132, ¶¶ 79-81 , 213 P.3d 258, 281 (App.2009). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Logangreen2 sentences2009State v. Logan, 200 Ariz. 564, 565-66, ¶ 9 , 30 P.3d 631, 632-33 (2001). ¶ 80 Here, Defendant expressly informed the superior court he did not want a lesser-ineluded offense instruction on reckless manslaughter because he thought the evidence did not support such an instruction. 2009State v. Logan, 200 Ariz. 564, 565-66, ¶ 9 , 30 P.3d 631, 632-33 (2001). ¶ 80 Here, Defendant expressly informed the superior court he did not want a lesser-ineluded offense instruction on reckless manslaughter because he thought the evidence did not support such an instruction. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Coronagreen2 sentences2006See Detrich, 178 Ariz. at 383 , 873 P.2d at 1305 ; State v. Corona, 188 Ariz. 85, 89 , 932 P.2d 1356, 1360 (App.1997). ¶ 7 Here, defendant was charged with multiple counts of aggravated assault and misconduct involving a weapon arising from a vehicle to vehicle drive-by shooting. 2006See Detrich, 178 Ariz. at 383 , 873 P.2d at 1305 ; State v. Corona, 188 Ariz. 85, 89 , 932 P.2d 1356, 1360 (App.1997). ¶ 7 Here, defendant was charged with multiple counts of aggravated assault and misconduct involving a weapon arising from a vehicle to vehicle drive-by shooting. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Detrichgreen2 sentences2006See Detrich, 178 Ariz. at 383 , 873 P.2d at 1305 ; State v. Corona, 188 Ariz. 85, 89 , 932 P.2d 1356, 1360 (App.1997). ¶ 7 Here, defendant was charged with multiple counts of aggravated assault and misconduct involving a weapon arising from a vehicle to vehicle drive-by shooting. 2006See Detrich, 178 Ariz. at 383 , 873 P.2d at 1305 ; State v. Corona, 188 Ariz. 85, 89 , 932 P.2d 1356, 1360 (App.1997). ¶ 7 Here, defendant was charged with multiple counts of aggravated assault and misconduct involving a weapon arising from a vehicle to vehicle drive-by shooting. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Beck v. Alabama
green
1 sentence2009Id. at 627-28, 630 , 100 S.Ct. 2382 . | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.