objectively reasonable professional standard (Arizona) · Go Syfert
← Arizona issues

objectively reasonable professional standard in Arizona

6 Arizona opinions name it 1 courts 2010–2017 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Nashgreen
ariz · 1985 · cited in 6 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2010–2017
2 sentences

2017Strickland, 466 U.S. at 687 ; State v. Nash, 143 Ariz. 392, 397 (1985). ¶5 A review of the record details the procedural history of the case and is not supportive of Sullivan’s claims.

2017See Strickland, 466 U.S. at 687 ; State v. Nash, 143 Ariz. 392, 397 (1985).

66
Strickland v. Washingtongreen
scotus · 1984 · cited in 6 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2010–2017
2 sentences

2017Strickland, 466 U.S. at 687 ; State v. Nash, 143 Ariz. 392, 397 (1985). ¶5 A review of the record details the procedural history of the case and is not supportive of Sullivan’s claims.

2017See Strickland, 466 U.S. at 687 ; State v. Nash, 143 Ariz. 392, 397 (1985).

46

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Where else courts name it

AZ 6 (2010–2017) TX 4 (2004–2015)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check