Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Arizona opinions name it 2 courts 1976–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Jamesongreen2 sentences1995This court has previously expressed “disapproval of the practice of deferring the hearing on probation revocation until after the adjudication of guilt or innocence on the new criminal charge____” State v. Jameson, 112 Ariz. 315, 318 , 541 P.2d 912, 915 (1975). 1995This court has previously expressed “disapproval of the practice of deferring the hearing on probation revocation until after the adjudication of guilt or innocence on the new criminal charge____” State v. Jameson, 112 Ariz. 315, 318 , 541 P.2d 912, 915 (1975). | 1 | 5 |
State v. Flemminggreen1 sentence2016Cf. Flemming, 184 Ariz. at 115 (Expressing “disapproval of the practice of deferring the hearing on probation revocation until after the adjudication of guilt or innocence on the new criminal charge.”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State Ex Rel. Bertrand v. Hunt
neutral
1 sentence1976Bertrand v. Hunt, 308 So.2d 760 (La.1975). 2 The fact that the practice of deferring the hearing on probation revocation until after the adjudication on the criminal charges was expressly disapproved of in State v. Jameson, 112 Ariz. 315 , 541 P.2d 912 (1975) does not operate to invalidate the revocation. | 1 | 1976–1976 |