Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 California opinions name it 1 courts 1970–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Rothgreen2 sentences1987Board of Regents v. Roth (1972) 408 U.S. 564, 569 [ 33 L.Ed.2d 548, 556 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 ], held a nontenured assistant professor hired for one year who was not rehired for the next year was not entitled to a statement of reasons and a hearing on the university’s decision not to rehire him. 1987Board of Regents v. Roth (1972) 408 U.S. 564, 569 [ 33 L.Ed.2d 548, 556 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 ], held a nontenured assistant professor hired for one year who was not rehired for the next year was not entitled to a statement of reasons and a hearing on the university’s decision not to rehire him. | 2 | 2 |
Codd v. Velgergreen2 sentences1987Codd v. Velger, supra, 429 U.S. 624 [ 51 L.Ed.2d 92 , 97 S.Ct. 882 ], and Dennis v. S & S Consolidated Rural H. 1987Codd v. Velger, supra, 429 U.S. 624 [ 51 L.Ed.2d 92 , 97 S.Ct. 882 ], and Dennis v. S & S Consolidated Rural H. | 1 | 2 |
Chitsazzadeh v. Kramer & Kaslowgreen1 sentence2025(Platypus Wear, Inc. v. Goldberg (2008) 166 Cal.App.4th 772, 783 .) Further, “[t]he purpose of these timing requirements is to facilitate the dismissal of an action subject to a special motion to strike early in the litigation so as to minimize the cost to the defendant.” (Chitsazzadeh v. Kramer & Kaslow (2011) 199 Cal.App.4th 676, 682 (Chitsazzadeh.)) We review a trial court’s denial of an untimely anti-SLAPP motion under an abuse of discretion standard. | 1 | 1 |
Paul v. Davisgreen2 sentences1995Paul v. Davis (1976) 424 U.S. 693 [ 47 L.Ed.2d 405 , 96 S.Ct. 1155 ] and Siegert v. Gilley (1991) 500 U.S. 226 [114L.Ed.2d 277, 111 S.Ct. 1789 ] teach us that government infliction of a stigma to one’s reputation, standing alone, will not support a liberty claim based on employment foreclosure. “[Reputation alone, apart from some more tangible interests such as employment,” is not encompassed in the concept of liberty at all. 1995Paul v. Davis (1976) 424 U.S. 693 [ 47 L.Ed.2d 405 , 96 S.Ct. 1155 ] and Siegert v. Gilley (1991) 500 U.S. 226 [114L.Ed.2d 277, 111 S.Ct. 1789 ] teach us that government infliction of a stigma to one’s reputation, standing alone, will not support a liberty claim based on employment foreclosure. “[Reputation alone, apart from some more tangible interests such as employment,” is not encompassed in the concept of liberty at all. | 1 | 1 |
Zumwalt v. Trustees of California State Collegesgreen2 sentences1981It affords him only “an opportunity to clear his name.” (Board of Regents v. Roth, supra, 408 U.S. at p. 573 [ 33 L.Ed.2d at p. 558 ]; Codd v. Velger (1977) 429 U.S. 624, 627 [ 51 L.Ed.2d 92, 96 , 97 S.Ct. 882 ]; Zumwalt v. Trustees of Cal. State Colleges (1973) 33 Cal.App.3d 665, 680 [ 109 Cal.Rptr. 344 ].) *529 There is nothing in the record to show that Shimoyama has ever sought a hearing for that purpose. 1981It affords him only “an opportunity to clear his name.” (Board of Regents v. Roth, supra, 408 U.S. at p. 573 [ 33 L.Ed.2d at p. 558 ]; Codd v. Velger (1977) 429 U.S. 624, 627 [ 51 L.Ed.2d 92, 96 , 97 S.Ct. 882 ]; Zumwalt v. Trustees of Cal. State Colleges (1973) 33 Cal.App.3d 665, 680 [ 109 Cal.Rptr. 344 ].) *529 There is nothing in the record to show that Shimoyama has ever sought a hearing for that purpose. | 1 | 1 |
Comunale v. Traders & General Insurancegreen2 sentences1970Co. (1958) 50 Cal.2d 654, 662 [ 328 P.2d 198 , 68 A.L.R.2d 883 ], wherein our Supreme Court held: “Sloan’s cause of action against the insurer arose on August 13, 1950, when the judgment in the bodily injury action became final. 1970Co. (1958) 50 Cal.2d 654, 662 [ 328 P.2d 198 , 68 A.L.R.2d 883 ], wherein our Supreme Court held: “Sloan’s cause of action against the insurer arose on August 13, 1950, when the judgment in the bodily injury action became final. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Platypus Wear, Inc. v. Goldberg
green
1 sentence2025(Platypus Wear, Inc. v. Goldberg (2008) 166 Cal.App.4th 772, 783 .) Further, “[t]he purpose of these timing requirements is to facilitate the dismissal of an action subject to a special motion to strike early in the litigation so as to minimize the cost to the defendant.” (Chitsazzadeh v. Kramer & Kaslow (2011) 199 Cal.App.4th 676, 682 (Chitsazzadeh.)) We review a trial court’s denial of an untimely anti-SLAPP motion under an abuse of discretion standard. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Siegert v. Gilley
green
2 sentences1995Paul v. Davis (1976) 424 U.S. 693 [ 47 L.Ed.2d 405 , 96 S.Ct. 1155 ] and Siegert v. Gilley (1991) 500 U.S. 226 [114L.Ed.2d 277, 111 S.Ct. 1789 ] teach us that government infliction of a stigma to one’s reputation, standing alone, will not support a liberty claim based on employment foreclosure. “[Reputation alone, apart from some more tangible interests such as employment,” is not encompassed in the concept of liberty at all. 1995Paul v. Davis (1976) 424 U.S. 693 [ 47 L.Ed.2d 405 , 96 S.Ct. 1155 ] and Siegert v. Gilley (1991) 500 U.S. 226 [114L.Ed.2d 277, 111 S.Ct. 1789 ] teach us that government infliction of a stigma to one’s reputation, standing alone, will not support a liberty claim based on employment foreclosure. “[Reputation alone, apart from some more tangible interests such as employment,” is not encompassed in the concept of liberty at all. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Phillips v. Civil Service Commission
green
2 sentences1987In Phillips v. Civil Service Com. (1987) 192 Cal.App.3d 996 [ 237 Cal.Rptr. 751 ], we noted probationary employees of public agencies may be dismissed without a hearing and without judicially cognizable good cause. 1987In Phillips v. Civil Service Com. (1987) 192 Cal.App.3d 996 [ 237 Cal.Rptr. 751 ], we noted probationary employees of public agencies may be dismissed without a hearing and without judicially cognizable good cause. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.