matter of statutory analysis (California) · Go Syfert
← California issues

matter of statutory analysis in California

6 California opinions name it 1 courts 1994–2024 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Carlsbad Aquafarm, Inc. v. State Department of Health Servicesgreen
calctapp · 2000 · cited in 2 California opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
2 sentences

2015Code, § 818.4; see also Carlsbad Aquafarm, Inc. v. State Dept. of Health Services (2000) 83 Cal.App.4th 809, 817, 821-823 [ 100 Cal.Rptr.2d 87 ].) As a matter of statutory immunity, Government Code section 818.4 protects Cal Fire from any liability for its error in suspending Fairview, and our holding in Carlsbad Aquafarm deprives it of any due process damage claim against the state.

2015Code, § 818.4; see also Carlsbad Aquafarm, Inc. v. State Dept. of Health Services (2000) 83 Cal.App.4th 809, 817, 821-823 [ 100 Cal.Rptr.2d 87 ].) As a matter of statutory immunity, Government Code section 818.4 protects Cal Fire from any liability for its error in suspending Fairview, and our holding in Carlsbad Aquafarm deprives it of any due process damage claim against the state.

22

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
People v. Brown green
calctapp · 2000
1 sentence

2024(Brown, at p. 1041.) The trial court sentenced her to the lower term for attempted voluntary manslaughter, citing her lack of criminal history, and the upper term for the firearm enhancement, “noting [she] ‘used this firearm repeatedly and inflict[ed] great bodily injury.’ ” (Id. at p. 1043.) On appeal, the Brown defendant claimed the trial court erred by imposing the lower term for the substantive offense and the upper term for the firearm enhancement. ( Brown, supra, 83 Cal.App.4th at pp. 1045–1046.) The Second District Court of Appeal rejected the notion that “as a matter of statutory or ru

12024–2024
City of Brentwood v. Campbell green
calctapp · 2015
2 sentences

2016It also contends there are constitutional 4 “ „Taxing entities‟ ” are the entities now entitled to tax increment after the abolition of redevelopment agencies. (§ 34171, subd. (k); Brentwood, supra, 237 Cal.App.4th at p. 492 .) 5 The Auditor-Controller is the nominal other defendant.

2016It also contends there are constitutional 4 “ „Taxing entities‟ ” are the entities now entitled to tax increment after the abolition of redevelopment agencies. (§ 34171, subd. (k); Brentwood, supra, 237 Cal.App.4th at p. 492 .) 5 The Auditor-Controller is the nominal other defendant.

12016–2016
People v. Jones green
cal · 1993
1 sentence

1996That is, we believe section 667.5(b), fairly read, merely provides a special sentence enhancement for that particular subset of ‘prior felony convictions’ that were deemed serious enough by earlier sentencing courts to warrant actual imprisonment. [Citations.]” (Prather, supra, at p. 440 , original italics.) In Jones , the court relied upon the Prather analysis to conclude that both the section 667, former subdivision (a) enhancement and the section 667.5, subdivision (b) enhancement “apply to the same facts—the prior conviction of a felony . . . .” (Jones, supra, 5 Cal.4th at p. 1149 .) The c

11996–1996
People v. Eric J. green
cal · 1979
1 sentence

1994Under In re Eric. supra, 25 Cal.3d 522 , he is entitled to credit against subsequent physical confinement only for earlier physical confinement.

11994–1994

Where else courts name it

TX 18 (2013–2024) CA 6 (1994–2024) AZ 3 (1966–1997)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check