Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 California opinions name it 2 courts 2014–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Cal-Air Conditioning, Inc. v. Auburn Union School Districtgreen2 sentences2019The Act was enacted "to prevent 'bid shopping' and 'bid peddling' after the award of a public contract and to give the awarding authority the opportunity to investigate and approve the initial subcontractors and any replacements." ( Titan , supra , 160 Cal.App.4th at p. 202 , 72 Cal.Rptr.3d 570 , fn. omitted; § 4101; see also Cal-Air Conditioning , supra , 21 Cal.App.4th at p. 668 , 26 Cal.Rptr.2d 703 .) "Bid shopping is the use of [a] low bid already received by the *661 [prime] contractor to pressure other subcontractors into submitting even lower bids. 2019The Act was enacted "to prevent 'bid shopping' and 'bid peddling' after the award of a public contract and to give the awarding authority the opportunity to investigate and approve the initial subcontractors and any replacements." ( Titan , supra , 160 Cal.App.4th at p. 202 , 72 Cal.Rptr.3d 570 , fn. omitted; § 4101; see also Cal-Air Conditioning , supra , 21 Cal.App.4th at p. 668 , 26 Cal.Rptr.2d 703 .) "Bid shopping is the use of [a] low bid already received by the *661 [prime] contractor to pressure other subcontractors into submitting even lower bids. | 2 | 2 |
Falcone v. Fykegreen2 sentences2014(In re Marriage of Falcone & Fyke (2012) 203 Cal.App.4th 964, 975 [ 138 Cal.Rptr.3d 44 ]; In re Marriage of Tharp (2010) 188 Cal.App.4th 1295, 1313-1314 [ 116 Cal.Rptr.3d 375 ].) “[T]he family court has considerable latitude in fashioning or denying an attorney fees award . .. .” (In re Marriage of Tharp, supra, 188 Cal.App.4th at p. 1313 .) However, the court’s “decision must reflect an exercise of discretion and a consideration of the appropriate factors as set forth in code sections 2030 and 2032.” (Ibid.; see In re Marriage of Falcone & Fyke, supra, 203 Cal.App.4th at p. 975 [the record mu 2014(In re Marriage of Falcone & Fyke (2012) 203 Cal.App.4th 964, 975 [ 138 Cal.Rptr.3d 44 ]; In re Marriage of Tharp (2010) 188 Cal.App.4th 1295, 1313-1314 [ 116 Cal.Rptr.3d 375 ].) “[T]he family court has considerable latitude in fashioning or denying an attorney fees award . .. .” (In re Marriage of Tharp, supra, 188 Cal.App.4th at p. 1313 .) However, the court’s “decision must reflect an exercise of discretion and a consideration of the appropriate factors as set forth in code sections 2030 and 2032.” (Ibid.; see In re Marriage of Falcone & Fyke, supra, 203 Cal.App.4th at p. 975 [the record mu | 2 | 2 |
In Re Marriage of Tharpgreen2 sentences2014(In re Marriage of Falcone & Fyke (2012) 203 Cal.App.4th 964, 975 [ 138 Cal.Rptr.3d 44 ]; In re Marriage of Tharp (2010) 188 Cal.App.4th 1295, 1313-1314 [ 116 Cal.Rptr.3d 375 ].) “[T]he family court has considerable latitude in fashioning or denying an attorney fees award . .. .” (In re Marriage of Tharp, supra, 188 Cal.App.4th at p. 1313 .) However, the court’s “decision must reflect an exercise of discretion and a consideration of the appropriate factors as set forth in code sections 2030 and 2032.” (Ibid.; see In re Marriage of Falcone & Fyke, supra, 203 Cal.App.4th at p. 975 [the record mu 2014(In re Marriage of Falcone & Fyke (2012) 203 Cal.App.4th 964, 975 [ 138 Cal.Rptr.3d 44 ]; In re Marriage of Tharp (2010) 188 Cal.App.4th 1295, 1313-1314 [ 116 Cal.Rptr.3d 375 ].) “[T]he family court has considerable latitude in fashioning or denying an attorney fees award . .. .” (In re Marriage of Tharp, supra, 188 Cal.App.4th at p. 1313 .) However, the court’s “decision must reflect an exercise of discretion and a consideration of the appropriate factors as set forth in code sections 2030 and 2032.” (Ibid.; see In re Marriage of Falcone & Fyke, supra, 203 Cal.App.4th at p. 975 [the record mu | 1 | 2 |
Richards, Watson & Gershon v. Kinggreen2 sentences2014(In re Marriage of Gray (2007) 155 Cal.App.4th 504, 515 [ 66 Cal.Rptr.3d 87 ]; Richards, Watson & Gershon v. King (1995) 39 Cal.App.4th 1176, 1180 [ 46 Cal.Rptr.2d 169 ].) Wife argues the trial court erred by failing to exercise its discretion with respect to the OSC and denying her request solely because of the erroneous conclusion that form FL-319 was mandatory. 2014(In re Marriage of Gray (2007) 155 Cal.App.4th 504, 515 [ 66 Cal.Rptr.3d 87 ]; Richards, Watson & Gershon v. King (1995) 39 Cal.App.4th 1176, 1180 [ 46 Cal.Rptr.2d 169 ].) Wife argues the trial court erred by failing to exercise its discretion with respect to the OSC and denying her request solely because of the erroneous conclusion that form FL-319 was mandatory. | 1 | 1 |
Caverly v. Graygreen2 sentences2014(In re Marriage of Gray (2007) 155 Cal.App.4th 504, 515 [ 66 Cal.Rptr.3d 87 ]; Richards, Watson & Gershon v. King (1995) 39 Cal.App.4th 1176, 1180 [ 46 Cal.Rptr.2d 169 ].) Wife argues the trial court erred by failing to exercise its discretion with respect to the OSC and denying her request solely because of the erroneous conclusion that form FL-319 was mandatory. 2014(In re Marriage of Gray (2007) 155 Cal.App.4th 504, 515 [ 66 Cal.Rptr.3d 87 ]; Richards, Watson & Gershon v. King (1995) 39 Cal.App.4th 1176, 1180 [ 46 Cal.Rptr.2d 169 ].) Wife argues the trial court erred by failing to exercise its discretion with respect to the OSC and denying her request solely because of the erroneous conclusion that form FL-319 was mandatory. | 1 | 1 |
Sharples v. Sharplesgreen1 sentence2014(In re Marriage of Falcone & Fyke (2012) 203 Cal.App.4th 964 , 975 . . . ; In re Marriage of Tharp (2010) 188 Cal.App.4th 1295 , 1313-1314 . . . .) “‘[T]he family court has considerable latitude in fashioning or denying an attorney fees award . . . .’ (In re Marriage of Tharp, supra, 188 Cal.App.4th at p. 1313 .) [But] the court’s ‘decision must reflect an exercise of discretion and a consideration of the appropriate factors as set forth in code sections 2030 and 2032.’ (Ibid.; see In re Marriage of Falcone & Fyke, supra, 203 Cal.App.4th at p. 975 [the record must reflect that the trial court | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Titan Elec. v. La Unified School Dist.
green
2 sentences2019The Act was enacted "to prevent 'bid shopping' and 'bid peddling' after the award of a public contract and to give the awarding authority the opportunity to investigate and approve the initial subcontractors and any replacements." ( Titan , supra , 160 Cal.App.4th at p. 202 , 72 Cal.Rptr.3d 570 , fn. omitted; § 4101; see also Cal-Air Conditioning , supra , 21 Cal.App.4th at p. 668 , 26 Cal.Rptr.2d 703 .) "Bid shopping is the use of [a] low bid already received by the *661 [prime] contractor to pressure other subcontractors into submitting even lower bids. 2019The Act was enacted "to prevent 'bid shopping' and 'bid peddling' after the award of a public contract and to give the awarding authority the opportunity to investigate and approve the initial subcontractors and any replacements." ( Titan , supra , 160 Cal.App.4th at p. 202 , 72 Cal.Rptr.3d 570 , fn. omitted; § 4101; see also Cal-Air Conditioning , supra , 21 Cal.App.4th at p. 668 , 26 Cal.Rptr.2d 703 .) "Bid shopping is the use of [a] low bid already received by the *661 [prime] contractor to pressure other subcontractors into submitting even lower bids. | 2 | 2019–2019 |
People v. Dueñas
green
1 sentence2025Failure to Make an Ability-To-Pay Finding Relying on People v. Dueñas (2019) 30 Cal.App.5th 1157 , defendant argues that the trial court erred in imposing the 4 Our Supreme Court expressly declined to reach this question in Walker. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
In Re As
green
1 sentence2022(In re Stephanie M., supra, 7 Cal.4th at p. 318 ; In re Robert L. (1993) 21 Cal.App.4th 1057, 1067 ; In re A.S. (2009) 180 Cal.App.4th 351, 358 .) In any event, while the juvenile court cited section 388 rather than 361.3 in its ruling on mother’s request, it is evident it nonetheless considered the pertinent statutory factors in making its decision. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
San Joaquin County Department of Human Services v. Gary L.
green
1 sentence2022(In re Stephanie M., supra, 7 Cal.4th at p. 318 ; In re Robert L. (1993) 21 Cal.App.4th 1057, 1067 ; In re A.S. (2009) 180 Cal.App.4th 351, 358 .) In any event, while the juvenile court cited section 388 rather than 361.3 in its ruling on mother’s request, it is evident it nonetheless considered the pertinent statutory factors in making its decision. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
In Re Stephanie M.
green
1 sentence2022(In re Stephanie M., supra, 7 Cal.4th at p. 318 ; In re Robert L. (1993) 21 Cal.App.4th 1057, 1067 ; In re A.S. (2009) 180 Cal.App.4th 351, 358 .) In any event, while the juvenile court cited section 388 rather than 361.3 in its ruling on mother’s request, it is evident it nonetheless considered the pertinent statutory factors in making its decision. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.