Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
51 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 1999–2026 6 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Munozgreen2 sentences2026State v. Munoz, 991 S.W.2d 818, 822 (Tex. Crim. 2023See Hopper, 520 S.W.3d at 924 ; Rivera v. State, 990 S.W.2d 882, 890 (Tex. App.—Austin 1999, pet. ref’d) (“Delay which is attributable in whole or in part to the defendant may constitute a waiver of a speedy trial claim.” (citing State v. Munoz, 991 S.W.2d 818, 821 (Tex. Crim. | 17 | 41 |
Barker v. Wingogreen2 sentences2023Id. (citation omitted). 2022Barker, 407 U.S. at 529 (“We hardly need add that if delay is attributable to the defendant, then his waiver may be given effect under standard waiver doctrine, the demand rule aside.”); Rivera v. State, 990 S.W.2d 882, 890 (Tex. App.—Austin 1999, pet. ref’d) (given defendant’s “hasty disappearance from Austin” and use of aliases, the “reason for delay” factor did not weigh against the State). | 8 | 16 |
Dickey v. Floridagreen2 sentences2019Munoz, 991 S.W.2d at 822 ; see Barker, 407 U.S. at 528–30; Dickey v. Florida, 398 U.S. 30, 48 (1970) (Brennan, J., concurring) (defendant may be “disentitled to the speedy-trial safeguard in the case of a delay for which he has, or shares, responsibility”). 5 There is no evidence of deliberate delay in this case. 2018Munoz, 991 S.W.2d at 822 ; see Barker, 407 U.S. at 528–30 (delay attributable to defendant constitutes waiver of speedy trial); Dickey v. Florida, 398 U.S. 30, 48 (1970) (Brennan, J., concurring) (defendant may be “disentitled to the speedy-trial safeguard in the case of a delay for which he has, or shares, responsibility”). | 8 | 9 |
Rivera v. Stategreen2 sentences2023See Hopper, 520 S.W.3d at 924 ; Rivera v. State, 990 S.W.2d 882, 890 (Tex. App.—Austin 1999, pet. ref’d) (“Delay which is attributable in whole or in part to the defendant may constitute a waiver of a speedy trial claim.” (citing State v. Munoz, 991 S.W.2d 818, 821 (Tex. Crim. 2022Barker, 407 U.S. at 529 (“We hardly need add that if delay is attributable to the defendant, then his waiver may be given effect under standard waiver doctrine, the demand rule aside.”); Rivera v. State, 990 S.W.2d 882, 890 (Tex. App.—Austin 1999, pet. ref’d) (given defendant’s “hasty disappearance from Austin” and use of aliases, the “reason for delay” factor did not weigh against the State). | 4 | 4 |
Hopper v. Stategreen2 sentences2023See Hopper, 520 S.W.3d at 924 ; Rivera v. State, 990 S.W.2d 882, 890 (Tex. App.—Austin 1999, pet. ref’d) (“Delay which is attributable in whole or in part to the defendant may constitute a waiver of a speedy trial claim.” (citing State v. Munoz, 991 S.W.2d 818, 821 (Tex. Crim. 2019Hopper, 520 S.W.3d at 924 ; Balderas, 517 S.W.3d at 768 . 2 2 Delay that is attributable in whole or in part to the defendant may constitute a waiver of the speedy-trial claim. | 1 | 2 |
Prescott v. Stategreen1 sentence2023App. 1999))); Prescott v. State, 123 S.W.3d 506, 516 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, no pet.) (“In this case, part of the delay was caused by [defendant]’s attorney’s continuances, announcements of not ready, and failures to appear. | 1 | 1 |
Jackson v. Stategreen1 sentence2019See Jackson v. State, 17 S.W.3d 664, 674 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Webb v. Stategreen1 sentence2005See State v. Munoz , 991 S.W.2d at 822 ; Webb v. State , 36 S.W.3d 164, 173 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2000, pet. ref’d). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Balderas v. State
green
1 sentence2019Hopper, 520 S.W.3d at 924 ; Balderas, 517 S.W.3d at 768 . 2 2 Delay that is attributable in whole or in part to the defendant may constitute a waiver of the speedy-trial claim. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.