Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 California opinions name it 1 courts 1961–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Tallegreen2 sentences1990“It is a prosecutor’s duty ‘to see that those accused of crime are afforded a fair trial.’ (People v. Talle (1952) 111 Cal.App.2d 650, 667 [ 245 P.2d 633 ].) ‘The role of the prosecution far transcends the objective of high scores of conviction; its function is rather to serve as a public instrument of inquiry and, pursuant to the tenets of the decisions, to expose the facts.’ (People v. Franklin (1961) 194 Cal.App.2d 23, 29-30 [ 14 Cal.Rptr. 375 ].)” (People v. Andrews (1970) 14 Cal.App.3d 40, 48 [ 92 Cal.Rptr. 49 ].) “As the representative of the government a public prosecutor is not only ob 1990“It is a prosecutor’s duty ‘to see that those accused of crime are afforded a fair trial.’ (People v. Talle (1952) 111 Cal.App.2d 650, 667 [ 245 P.2d 633 ].) ‘The role of the prosecution far transcends the objective of high scores of conviction; its function is rather to serve as a public instrument of inquiry and, pursuant to the tenets of the decisions, to expose the facts.’ (People v. Franklin (1961) 194 Cal.App.2d 23, 29-30 [ 14 Cal.Rptr. 375 ].)” (People v. Andrews (1970) 14 Cal.App.3d 40, 48 [ 92 Cal.Rptr. 49 ].) “As the representative of the government a public prosecutor is not only ob | 4 | 4 |
People v. Franklingreen2 sentences1990“It is a prosecutor’s duty ‘to see that those accused of crime are afforded a fair trial.’ (People v. Talle (1952) 111 Cal.App.2d 650, 667 [ 245 P.2d 633 ].) ‘The role of the prosecution far transcends the objective of high scores of conviction; its function is rather to serve as a public instrument of inquiry and, pursuant to the tenets of the decisions, to expose the facts.’ (People v. Franklin (1961) 194 Cal.App.2d 23, 29-30 [ 14 Cal.Rptr. 375 ].)” (People v. Andrews (1970) 14 Cal.App.3d 40, 48 [ 92 Cal.Rptr. 49 ].) “As the representative of the government a public prosecutor is not only ob 1990“It is a prosecutor’s duty ‘to see that those accused of crime are afforded a fair trial.’ (People v. Talle (1952) 111 Cal.App.2d 650, 667 [ 245 P.2d 633 ].) ‘The role of the prosecution far transcends the objective of high scores of conviction; its function is rather to serve as a public instrument of inquiry and, pursuant to the tenets of the decisions, to expose the facts.’ (People v. Franklin (1961) 194 Cal.App.2d 23, 29-30 [ 14 Cal.Rptr. 375 ].)” (People v. Andrews (1970) 14 Cal.App.3d 40, 48 [ 92 Cal.Rptr. 49 ].) “As the representative of the government a public prosecutor is not only ob | 3 | 4 |
People v. Andrewsgreen2 sentences2015"It is a prosecutor's duty 'to see to it that those accused of crime are afforded a fair trial.' [Citation.] 'The role of the prosecution far transcends the objective of high scores of conviction; its function is rather to serve as a public instrument of inquiry and, pursuant to the tenets of the decisions, to expose the facts.' " (People v. Andrews (1970) 14 Cal.App.3d 40, 48 .) "Prosecutors, however, are held to an elevated standard of conduct. 'It is the duty of every member of the bar to "maintain the respect due to the courts" and to "abstain from all offensive personality." [Citation.] A 1990“It is a prosecutor’s duty ‘to see that those accused of crime are afforded a fair trial.’ (People v. Talle (1952) 111 Cal.App.2d 650, 667 [ 245 P.2d 633 ].) ‘The role of the prosecution far transcends the objective of high scores of conviction; its function is rather to serve as a public instrument of inquiry and, pursuant to the tenets of the decisions, to expose the facts.’ (People v. Franklin (1961) 194 Cal.App.2d 23, 29-30 [ 14 Cal.Rptr. 375 ].)” (People v. Andrews (1970) 14 Cal.App.3d 40, 48 [ 92 Cal.Rptr. 49 ].) “As the representative of the government a public prosecutor is not only ob | 1 | 2 |
People v. Wirthgreen2 sentences1961(See People v. Wirth (1960), 186 Cal.App.2d 68, 72-78 [ 8 Cal.Rptr. 823 ]; People v. Talle (1952), 111 Cal.App.2d 650, 677-679 [ 245 P.2d 633 ]; People v. Ramsey (1959), 172 Cal.App.2d 266, 274-275 [ 342 P.2d 287 ]; People v. Edgar (1917), 34 Cal.App. 459 [ 167 P. 891 ].) The role of the prosecution far transcends the objective of high scores of conviction; its function is rather to serve as a public instrument of inquiry and, pursuant to the *30 tenets of the decisions, to expose the facts. 1961(See People v. Wirth (1960), 186 Cal.App.2d 68, 72-78 [ 8 Cal.Rptr. 823 ]; People v. Talle (1952), 111 Cal.App.2d 650, 677-679 [ 245 P.2d 633 ]; People v. Ramsey (1959), 172 Cal.App.2d 266, 274-275 [ 342 P.2d 287 ]; People v. Edgar (1917), 34 Cal.App. 459 [ 167 P. 891 ].) The role of the prosecution far transcends the objective of high scores of conviction; its function is rather to serve as a public instrument of inquiry and, pursuant to the *30 tenets of the decisions, to expose the facts. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Ramseygreen2 sentences1961(See People v. Wirth (1960), 186 Cal.App.2d 68, 72-78 [ 8 Cal.Rptr. 823 ]; People v. Talle (1952), 111 Cal.App.2d 650, 677-679 [ 245 P.2d 633 ]; People v. Ramsey (1959), 172 Cal.App.2d 266, 274-275 [ 342 P.2d 287 ]; People v. Edgar (1917), 34 Cal.App. 459 [ 167 P. 891 ].) The role of the prosecution far transcends the objective of high scores of conviction; its function is rather to serve as a public instrument of inquiry and, pursuant to the *30 tenets of the decisions, to expose the facts. 1961(See People v. Wirth (1960), 186 Cal.App.2d 68, 72-78 [ 8 Cal.Rptr. 823 ]; People v. Talle (1952), 111 Cal.App.2d 650, 677-679 [ 245 P.2d 633 ]; People v. Ramsey (1959), 172 Cal.App.2d 266, 274-275 [ 342 P.2d 287 ]; People v. Edgar (1917), 34 Cal.App. 459 [ 167 P. 891 ].) The role of the prosecution far transcends the objective of high scores of conviction; its function is rather to serve as a public instrument of inquiry and, pursuant to the *30 tenets of the decisions, to expose the facts. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Hill
green
1 sentence2015"It is a prosecutor's duty 'to see to it that those accused of crime are afforded a fair trial.' [Citation.] 'The role of the prosecution far transcends the objective of high scores of conviction; its function is rather to serve as a public instrument of inquiry and, pursuant to the tenets of the decisions, to expose the facts.' " (People v. Andrews (1970) 14 Cal.App.3d 40, 48 .) "Prosecutors, however, are held to an elevated standard of conduct. 'It is the duty of every member of the bar to "maintain the respect due to the courts" and to "abstain from all offensive personality." [Citation.] A | 1 | 2015–2015 |
People v. Edgar
green
2 sentences1961(See People v. Wirth (1960), 186 Cal.App.2d 68, 72-78 [ 8 Cal.Rptr. 823 ]; People v. Talle (1952), 111 Cal.App.2d 650, 677-679 [ 245 P.2d 633 ]; People v. Ramsey (1959), 172 Cal.App.2d 266, 274-275 [ 342 P.2d 287 ]; People v. Edgar (1917), 34 Cal.App. 459 [ 167 P. 891 ].) The role of the prosecution far transcends the objective of high scores of conviction; its function is rather to serve as a public instrument of inquiry and, pursuant to the *30 tenets of the decisions, to expose the facts. 1961(See People v. Wirth (1960), 186 Cal.App.2d 68, 72-78 [ 8 Cal.Rptr. 823 ]; People v. Talle (1952), 111 Cal.App.2d 650, 677-679 [ 245 P.2d 633 ]; People v. Ramsey (1959), 172 Cal.App.2d 266, 274-275 [ 342 P.2d 287 ]; People v. Edgar (1917), 34 Cal.App. 459 [ 167 P. 891 ].) The role of the prosecution far transcends the objective of high scores of conviction; its function is rather to serve as a public instrument of inquiry and, pursuant to the *30 tenets of the decisions, to expose the facts. | 1 | 1961–1961 |