Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 California opinions name it 1 courts 2005–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re Carl R.green2 sentences2016(See § 241.1, subd. (e).) 4 An individualized education plan (IEP) “is a comprehensive statement of a disabled child’s educational needs and the specifically designed instruction and related services that will meet those needs. [Citation.] It is developed by a school official qualified in special education, the child’s teacher, and the parents. [Citation.]” (In re Carl R. (2005) 128 Cal.App.4th 1051, 1067 , fn. omitted.) “[A]n IEP is reviewed at least annually and revised as necessary.” (Ibid., citing 20 U.S.C. § 1414 (d)(4).) 3 602, and retained “dual status” jurisdiction with DCFS as the lea 2009However, parents may disregard the IEP and educate their child in a manner different from that specified by the IEP. [Citations.]" ( In re Carl R. (2005) 128 Cal.App.4th 1051, 1067 [ 27 Cal.Rptr.3d 612 ], fn. omitted.) "[A]n IEP is reviewed at least annually and revised as necessary." ( Ibid., citing 20 U.S.C. § 1414 (d)(4).) [2] "`A[ssembly] B[ill No.] 3632' refers to the adoption of what is now chapter 26.5 of division 7 of title I of the Government Code, section 7570 et seq., entitled `Interagency Responsibilities for Providing Services to Children With Disabilities.'" ( Grossmont Union Hig | 2 | 3 |
Grossmont Union High School District v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONgreen2 sentences2009However, parents may disregard the IEP and educate their child in a manner different from that specified by the IEP. [Citations.]" ( In re Carl R. (2005) 128 Cal.App.4th 1051, 1067 [ 27 Cal.Rptr.3d 612 ], fn. omitted.) "[A]n IEP is reviewed at least annually and revised as necessary." ( Ibid., citing 20 U.S.C. § 1414 (d)(4).) [2] "`A[ssembly] B[ill No.] 3632' refers to the adoption of what is now chapter 26.5 of division 7 of title I of the Government Code, section 7570 et seq., entitled `Interagency Responsibilities for Providing Services to Children With Disabilities.'" ( Grossmont Union Hig 2009However, parents may disregard the IEP and educate their child in a manner different from that specified by the IEP. [Citations.]" ( In re Carl R. (2005) 128 Cal.App.4th 1051, 1067 [ 27 Cal.Rptr.3d 612 ], fn. omitted.) "[A]n IEP is reviewed at least annually and revised as necessary." ( Ibid., citing 20 U.S.C. § 1414 (d)(4).) [2] "`A[ssembly] B[ill No.] 3632' refers to the adoption of what is now chapter 26.5 of division 7 of title I of the Government Code, section 7570 et seq., entitled `Interagency Responsibilities for Providing Services to Children With Disabilities.'" ( Grossmont Union Hig | 2 | 2 |
School Committee of the Town of Burlington v. Department of Educationgreen2 sentences2005An IEP is a comprehensive statement of a disabled child's educational needs and the specifically designed instruction and related services that will meet those needs. ( Burlington, supra, 471 U.S. at p. 368 , 105 S.Ct. 1996 .) It is developed by a school official qualified in special education, the child's teacher, and the parents. ( Ibid. ) It guides the school system as to how the child will be educated. 2005An IEP is a comprehensive statement of a disabled child's educational needs and the specifically designed instruction and related services that will meet those needs. ( Burlington, supra, 471 U.S. at p. 368 , 105 S.Ct. 1996 .) It is developed by a school official qualified in special education, the child's teacher, and the parents. ( Ibid. ) It guides the school system as to how the child will be educated. | 1 | 2 |
Orange County Social Services Agency v. M.C.green2 sentences2024(See In re Stephanie M., supra, 7 Cal.4th at pp. 318-319 [where the child had “special needs,” the juvenile court did not abuse its discretion in “placing special weight on the child’s need for stability”]; In re J.C., supra, 226 Cal.App.4th at p. 526 [where the child had “a loving and stable placement” for most of her life, the mother failed to show how her child’s “best interests in permanency and stability would be furthered by the proposed modification”].) Monique argues that she had difficulty attending the boys’ appointments because she lived far from the service providers and that, if s 2024(See In re Stephanie M., supra, 7 Cal.4th at pp. 318-319 [where the child had “special needs,” the juvenile court did not abuse its discretion in “placing special weight on the child’s need for stability”]; In re J.C., supra, 226 Cal.App.4th at p. 526 [where the child had “a loving and stable placement” for most of her life, the mother failed to show how her child’s “best interests in permanency and stability would be furthered by the proposed modification”].) Monique argues that she had difficulty attending the boys’ appointments because she lived far from the service providers and that, if s | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re RW
green
1 sentence2024At best, Monique presented an uncertain future for her boys, in 6 “‘An IEP is a comprehensive statement of a disabled child’s educational needs and the specifically designed instruction and related services that will meet those needs. [Citation.] It is developed by a school official qualified in special education, the child’s teacher, and the parents. [Citation.] It guides the school system as to how the child will be educated.’” (In re R.W. (2009) 172 Cal.App.4th 1268 , 1270, fn. 1.) 14 contrast to the certainty and guaranteed access to services that their current placement gave them. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Florence County School District Four v. Carter Ex Rel. Carter
green
2 sentences2005However, parents may disregard the IEP and educate their child in a manner different from that specified by the IEP. [10] ( Burlington, supra, 471 U. S. at pp. 373-374, 105 S.Ct. 1996 ; Florence County School District Four v. Carter, supra, 510 U.S. at p. 13 , 114 S.Ct. 361 ; 34 C.F.R. § 300.403 .) Thus, the M. family may disregard the current IEP. 2005However, parents may disregard the IEP and educate their child in a manner different from that specified by the IEP. [10] ( Burlington, supra, 471 U. S. at pp. 373-374, 105 S.Ct. 1996 ; Florence County School District Four v. Carter, supra, 510 U.S. at p. 13 , 114 S.Ct. 361 ; 34 C.F.R. § 300.403 .) Thus, the M. family may disregard the current IEP. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.