Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 California opinions name it 3 courts 1999–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re Marriage of Barnesongreen2 sentences2019Thus, regardless of what extrinsic evidence would show about the existence of a trust, Richard’s intention remains ambiguous in that “[n]othing on the face of the document[ ] upon which the transmutation claim is based precludes the possibility the transfer was made in trust.” (Barneson, supra, 69 Cal.App.4th at p. 591 [“We do not suggest there is evidence of such a trust in the present case . . . . 2018Thus, regardless of what extrinsic evidence would show about the existence of a trust, Richard's intention remains ambiguous in that "[n]othing on the face of the document[ ] upon which the transmutation claim is based precludes the possibility the transfer was made in trust." ( Barneson, supra, 69 Cal.App.4th at p. 591 , 81 Cal.Rptr.2d 726 ["We do not suggest there is evidence of such a trust in *517 the present case .... | 2 | 4 |
Reagh v. Kelleygreen2 sentences1999While no such indication appears on the documents themselves, a trust need not be created in a single instrument (Reagh v. Kelley (1970) 10 Cal.App.3d 1082, 1090 [ 89 Cal.Rptr. 425 ]); here, since securities and not real property are at issue, the stocks could even have been made the subject of an oral trust. 1999While no such indication appears on the documents themselves, a trust need not be created in a single instrument (Reagh v. Kelley (1970) 10 Cal.App.3d 1082, 1090 [ 89 Cal.Rptr. 425 ]); here, since securities and not real property are at issue, the stocks could even have been made the subject of an oral trust. | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Long Beach Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
green
2 sentences1999While no such indication appears on the documents themselves, a trust need not be created in a single instrument ( Reagh v. Kelley (1970) 10 Cal.App.3d 1082, 1090 , 89 Cal.Rptr. 425 ); here, since securities and not real property are at issue, the stocks could even have been made the subject of an oral trust. ( Bank of America v. Long Beach etc. Assn. (1956) 141 Cal.App.2d 618, 623 , 297 P.2d 443 ; Hardison v. Corbett (1942) 55 Cal. App.2d 310, 317 , 130 P.2d 226 .) We do not suggest there is evidence of such a trust in the present case, nor that we could directly consider such evidence in det 1999While no such indication appears on the documents themselves, a trust need not be created in a single instrument ( Reagh v. Kelley (1970) 10 Cal.App.3d 1082, 1090 , 89 Cal.Rptr. 425 ); here, since securities and not real property are at issue, the stocks could even have been made the subject of an oral trust. ( Bank of America v. Long Beach etc. Assn. (1956) 141 Cal.App.2d 618, 623 , 297 P.2d 443 ; Hardison v. Corbett (1942) 55 Cal. App.2d 310, 317 , 130 P.2d 226 .) We do not suggest there is evidence of such a trust in the present case, nor that we could directly consider such evidence in det | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Hardison v. Corbett
green
2 sentences1999While no such indication appears on the documents themselves, a trust need not be created in a single instrument ( Reagh v. Kelley (1970) 10 Cal.App.3d 1082, 1090 , 89 Cal.Rptr. 425 ); here, since securities and not real property are at issue, the stocks could even have been made the subject of an oral trust. ( Bank of America v. Long Beach etc. Assn. (1956) 141 Cal.App.2d 618, 623 , 297 P.2d 443 ; Hardison v. Corbett (1942) 55 Cal. App.2d 310, 317 , 130 P.2d 226 .) We do not suggest there is evidence of such a trust in the present case, nor that we could directly consider such evidence in det 1999While no such indication appears on the documents themselves, a trust need not be created in a single instrument ( Reagh v. Kelley (1970) 10 Cal.App.3d 1082, 1090 , 89 Cal.Rptr. 425 ); here, since securities and not real property are at issue, the stocks could even have been made the subject of an oral trust. ( Bank of America v. Long Beach etc. Assn. (1956) 141 Cal.App.2d 618, 623 , 297 P.2d 443 ; Hardison v. Corbett (1942) 55 Cal. App.2d 310, 317 , 130 P.2d 226 .) We do not suggest there is evidence of such a trust in the present case, nor that we could directly consider such evidence in det | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Estate of MacDonald
green
2 sentences1999While no such indication appears on the documents themselves, a trust need not be created in a single instrument ( Reagh v. Kelley (1970) 10 Cal.App.3d 1082, 1090 , 89 Cal.Rptr. 425 ); here, since securities and not real property are at issue, the stocks could even have been made the subject of an oral trust. ( Bank of America v. Long Beach etc. Assn. (1956) 141 Cal.App.2d 618, 623 , 297 P.2d 443 ; Hardison v. Corbett (1942) 55 Cal. App.2d 310, 317 , 130 P.2d 226 .) We do not suggest there is evidence of such a trust in the present case, nor that we could directly consider such evidence in det 1999While no such indication appears on the documents themselves, a trust need not be created in a single instrument ( Reagh v. Kelley (1970) 10 Cal.App.3d 1082, 1090 , 89 Cal.Rptr. 425 ); here, since securities and not real property are at issue, the stocks could even have been made the subject of an oral trust. ( Bank of America v. Long Beach etc. Assn. (1956) 141 Cal.App.2d 618, 623 , 297 P.2d 443 ; Hardison v. Corbett (1942) 55 Cal. App.2d 310, 317 , 130 P.2d 226 .) We do not suggest there is evidence of such a trust in the present case, nor that we could directly consider such evidence in det | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.