golden rule (Colorado) · Go Syfert
← Colorado issues

golden rule in Colorado

6 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 2001–2026 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
People v. Munseygreen
coloctapp · 2009 · cited in 2 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 2019–2026
2 sentences

2026Munsey, 232 P.3d at 123 . 3.

2019See Munsey, 232 P.3d at 123 (holding that a golden rule argument that appeals to jurors as taxpayers was inappropriate, but that isolated comment was unlikely to substantially influence the verdict).

12
Farmers High Line Canal & Reservoir Co. v. City of Goldengreen
colo · 1999 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 2001–2001
1 sentence

2001See Farmers High Line Canal & Reservoir Co., 975 P.2d at 201-02 .

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
People v. Manyik green
coloctapp · 2016
1 sentence

2025People v. Manyik, 2016 COA 42, ¶ 28 .

12025–2025
In Re the Marriage of Mallon green
coloctapp · 1998
1 sentence

2005Relying on In re Marriage of Mallon, supra, 956 P.2d at 645 , plaintiffs correctly argue that a party may not collaterally attack a final judgment when it had a prior opportunity to challenge the subject matter jurisdiction during the original action.

12005–2005
People v. Dunlap green
colo · 1999
1 sentence

2004People v. Dunlap, 975 P.2d 723 (Colo.1999); People v. Fernandez, 883 P.2d 491 (Colo.App.1994).

12004–2004
People v. Fernandez green
coloctapp · 1994
1 sentence

2004People v. Dunlap, 975 P.2d 723 (Colo.1999); People v. Fernandez, 883 P.2d 491 (Colo.App.1994).

12004–2004

Where else courts name it

FL 42 (1969–2025) GA 25 (1908–2025) MS 23 (1965–2026) CA 20 (1978–2025) KS 19 (1990–2026) NC 14 (1929–2022) NV 13 (2000–2022) CT 12 (1912–2024) AL 10 (1859–2016) TX 9 (1942–2020) NJ 9 (2003–2024) WA 9 (1988–2018) MD 8 (1991–2024) WI 8 (1919–2026) NY 7 (1921–2024) CO 6 (2001–2026) OH 6 (2000–2022) AR 5 (1969–2025) VT 4 (2017–2024) PA 4 (1917–2017) WY 4 (1989–2025) KY 4 (1922–2023) IA 3 (1976–2025) RI 3 (1993–2025) IL 3 (1896–2026) DE 3 (2014–2025) ND 2 (1997–1997) WV 2 (1986–2018) SC 2 (2004–2019) AZ 2 (1989–1989) MO 2 (1908–1933) MT 2 (1978–2013)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check