Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 New York opinions name it 2 courts 1921–2024 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Mulroe v. New York-Presbyt. Hosp.green2 sentences2024Hosp. , 203 AD3d 665, 665 [1st Dept 2022]; Echevarria v Bernstein , 200 AD3d 575 , 575 [1st Dept 2021]), do not specifically controvert the opinion of defendants' expert ( see Sternberg v Rugova, 162 AD3d 456 , 456-457 [1st Dept 2018]), are conclusory and speculative, and fail to raise a triable issue of fact ( see Weitz v Bernstein , 194 AD3d 592 , 593 [1st Dept 2021]). 2024Hosp. , 203 AD3d 665, 665 [1st Dept 2022]; Echevarria v Bernstein , 200 AD3d 575 , 575 [1st Dept 2021]), do not specifically controvert the opinion of defendants' expert ( see Sternberg v Rugova, 162 AD3d 456 , 456-457 [1st Dept 2018]), are conclusory and speculative, and fail to raise a triable issue of fact ( see Weitz v Bernstein , 194 AD3d 592 , 593 [1st Dept 2021]). | 2 | 2 |
Prudential Property & Casualty Co. v. Szeligreen2 sentences2012Co. v Szeli, 83 NY2d 681, 687 [1994]; see Matter of Allstate Ins. 2012Co. v Szeli, 83 NY2d 681, 687 [1994]; see Matter of Allstate Ins. | 2 | 2 |
Achee v. Merrick Vil., Inc.green1 sentence2023"Leave to amend a bill of particulars is ordinarily to be freely given in the absence of prejudice or surprise" ( Lorincz v Castellano , 208 AD3d 573, 574 ; see Achee v Merrick Vil., Inc. , 208 AD3d 542, 543 ). | 1 | 1 |
Weiss v. Tri-State Consumer Insurancegreen1 sentence2016Co., 98 AD3d at 1110, quoting Matter of Prudential Prop. & Cas. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lorincz v. Castellano
green
1 sentence2023"Leave to amend a bill of particulars is ordinarily to be freely given in the absence of prejudice or surprise" ( Lorincz v Castellano , 208 AD3d 573, 574 ; see Achee v Merrick Vil., Inc. , 208 AD3d 542, 543 ). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Clark v. . Cammann
green
1 sentence1921Clark v. Cammann, 160 N. Y. 315, 324 . “ There is one rule of construction which, to my mind is a golden rule, viz., that when a testator has executed a will in solemn form you must assume that he did not intend to make it a solemn farce,— that he did not intend to die intestate when he has gone through the form of making a will.” Matter of Harrison, 30 Ch. | 1 | 1921–1921 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.