Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1942–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Golden Rule Insurance Co. v. Harpergreen2 sentences2001The Golden Rule standard is not whether a court will be deprived of jurisdiction, but whether there is a “threat” to the court’s jurisdiction. 925 S.W.2d at 651 . 2001The Golden Rule standard is not whether a court will be deprived of jurisdiction, but whether there is a “threat” to the court’s jurisdiction. 925 S.W.2d at 651 . | 1 | 2 |
Fleming v. Ahumadagreen2 sentences2008Fleming v. Ahumada , 193 S.W.3d 704 , 714–15 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2006, no pet.) (where party was being forced to litigate second suit in improper forum, “clear equity” supported anti-suit injunction). 2008Fleming v. Ahumada , 193 S.W.3d 704 , 714–15 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2006, no pet.) (where party was being forced to litigate second suit in improper forum, “clear equity” supported anti-suit injunction). | 1 | 2 |
Armstrong v. Steppes Apartments, Ltd.green1 sentence2011See Triton Energy, 52 S.W.3d at 342 ; Armstrong v. Steppes Apartments, Ltd., 57 S.W.3d 37, 51 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2001, pet. denied) (concluding all Golden Rule factors supported injunction). | 1 | 1 |
American International Specialty Lines Insurance Co. v. Triton Energy Ltd.green2 sentences2011Id. 2011See Triton Energy, 52 S.W.3d at 342 ; Armstrong v. Steppes Apartments, Ltd., 57 S.W.3d 37, 51 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2001, pet. denied) (concluding all Golden Rule factors supported injunction). | 1 | 1 |
Panda Energy Corp. v. Allstate Insurance Co.green2 sentences2008See Panda Energy, 91 S.W.3d at 35 . 2008See Panda Energy, 91 S.W.3d at 35 . | 1 | 1 |
Rapid Settlements, Ltd. v. Symetra Life Insurance Co.green1 sentence2008Co., 234 S.W.3d 788, 795 (Tex.App.-Tyler 2007, no pet.) (applying Golden Rule test in analyzing whether trial court erred in issuing temporary anti-suit injunction seventeen months after order signed). | 1 | 1 |
North East Independent School District v. Aldridgegreen1 sentence1987As our Supreme Court has recognized, the rule that an appeal may be taken only from a final judgment “is deceiving in *365 its apparent simplicity and vexing in its application.” Allen v. Allen, 717 S.W.2d 311, 312 (Tex.1986); North East Independent School District v. Aldridge, 400 S.W.2d 893, 895 (Tex.1966). | 1 | 1 |
Allen v. Allengreen1 sentence1987As our Supreme Court has recognized, the rule that an appeal may be taken only from a final judgment “is deceiving in *365 its apparent simplicity and vexing in its application.” Allen v. Allen, 717 S.W.2d 311, 312 (Tex.1986); North East Independent School District v. Aldridge, 400 S.W.2d 893, 895 (Tex.1966). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Operation Rescue-National v. Planned Parenthood of Houston and Southeast Texas, Inc.
green
2 sentences2020Tex., 975 S.W.2d 546 , 560 & n.56 (Tex. 1998). 2020Tex., 975 S.W.2d 546 , 560 & n.56 (Tex. 1998). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Fambrough v. Wagley
green
2 sentences1969The Supreme Court in Fambrough v. Wagley, 140 Tex. 577 , 169 S.W.2d 478 (1943), held that it was not error for counsel to tell the jury to follow the Golden Rule because such rule would require the jury to look with equal solicitude to the rights of both plaintiff and defendant. 1969The Supreme Court in Fambrough v. Wagley, 140 Tex. 577 , 169 S.W.2d 478 (1943), held that it was not error for counsel to tell the jury to follow the Golden Rule because such rule would require the jury to look with equal solicitude to the rights of both plaintiff and defendant. | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Southern Ice & Utilities Co. v. Richardson
green
1 sentence1942It was more in the nature of a general appeal to the jurors to apply the golden rule.” Southern Ice & Utilities Co. v. Richardson, 128 Tex. 82 , 95 S.W.2d 956, 957 . | 1 | 1942–1942 |
Texas Coca Cola v. Lovejoy
neutral
1 sentence1942This court later passed upon an assignment in a case wherein was challenged the propriety of an argument, in which the jurors were told: “You gentlemen, in arriving at your verdict, should put yourselves in Mr. Lovejoy’s shoes and consider how you would feel in_ the event it were your wives who had been *1077 damaged to the extent that Mrs. Lovejoy has been damaged.” Texas Coca Cola Bottling Co. v. Lovejoy, Tex.Civ.App., 112 S.W.2d 203, 204 . | 1 | 1942–1942 |
Southern Ice & Utilities Co. v. Richardson
neutral
1 sentence1942It was more in the nature of a general appeal to the jurors to apply the golden rule.” Southern Ice & Utilities Co. v. Richardson, 128 Tex. 82 , 95 S.W.2d 956, 957 . | 1 | 1942–1942 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.