last injurious exposure standard (Colorado) · Go Syfert
← Colorado issues

last injurious exposure standard in Colorado

6 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 1986–1999 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

CaseFollowedCited
Climax Molybdenum Co. v. Waltergreen
colo · 1991 · cited in 3 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 1992–1995
2 sentences

1993Royal Globe Insurance Co. v. Collins, supra; see also Climax Molybdenum Co. v. Walter, supra. In our view, the addition of the phrase “substantial permanent aggravation” to § 8-41-304(1) did not eliminate or change the last injurious exposure test for causation as interpreted in Union Carbide and Royal Globe.

1992Climax Molybdenum v. Walter, supra. The purpose of the last injurious exposure rule under § 8-51-112 is to provide a certain and expedient method of compensating workers disabled by occupational diseases.

23
Royal Globe Insurance Co. v. Collinsgreen
colo · 1986 · cited in 2 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 1993–1995
2 sentences

1995In Royal Globe Insurance Co. v. Collins, 723 P.2d 731 (Colo.1986), the supreme court extended the last injurious exposure rule, originally adopted for application in particulate exposure cases, to occupational diseases caused by repetitive functions.

1993See Royal Globe Insurance Co. v. Collins, supra. In Royal Globe, our supreme court acknowledged that some jurisdictions have developed a “contribution” test for application of a last injurious exposure standard to diseases caused by physical activities.

22
Robbins Flower Shop v. Cineagreen
coloctapp · 1995 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 1999–1999
2 sentences

1999See Robbins Flower Shop v. Cinea, 894 P.2d 63 (Colo.App.1995).

1999See Robbins Flower Shop v. Cinea, 894 P.2d 63 (Colo.App.1995).

11
Monfort, Inc. v. Rangelgreen
coloctapp · 1993 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 1995–1995
2 sentences

1995See Monfort, Inc. v. Rangel, 867 P.2d 122 (Colo.App.1993).

1995In Monfort, supra, a division of this court determined that the addition of the phrase “substantial permanent aggravation” was intended to minimize the harsh effects of the last injurious exposure rule.

11
Scott Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Boardgreen
calctapp · 1983 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 1986–1986
2 sentences

1986See, e.g., Scott Co. v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board, 139 Cal.App.3d 98 , 188 Cal.Rptr. 537 (1983); Thermos Co. v. Industrial Commission, 83 Ill.2d 54 , 46 Ill.Dec. 133 , 413 N.E.2d 1246 (1980); Busse v. Quality Insulation Co., 322 N.W.2d 206 (Minn.1982); Halverson v. Larrivy Plumbing & Heating Co., 322 N.W.2d 203 (Minn.1982); Rutledge v. Tultex Corp./Kings Yarn, 308 N.C. 85 , 301 S.E.2d 359 (1983); Boise Cascade Corp. v. Starbuck, 296 Or. 238 , 675 P.2d 1044 (1984); Bracke v. Baza’r, Inc., 293 Or. 239 , 646 P.2d 1330 (1982); Maraney v. Workmens’ Compensation Appeal Board, 66 Pa.Cmwlth.

1986See, e.g., Scott Co. v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board, 139 Cal.App.3d 98 , 188 Cal.Rptr. 537 (1983); Thermos Co. v. Industrial Commission, 83 Ill.2d 54 , 46 Ill.Dec. 133 , 413 N.E.2d 1246 (1980); Busse v. Quality Insulation Co., 322 N.W.2d 206 (Minn.1982); Halverson v. Larrivy Plumbing & Heating Co., 322 N.W.2d 203 (Minn.1982); Rutledge v. Tultex Corp./Kings Yarn, 308 N.C. 85 , 301 S.E.2d 359 (1983); Boise Cascade Corp. v. Starbuck, 296 Or. 238 , 675 P.2d 1044 (1984); Bracke v. Baza’r, Inc., 293 Or. 239 , 646 P.2d 1330 (1982); Maraney v. Workmens’ Compensation Appeal Board, 66 Pa.Cmwlth.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (10)

CaseCitedYears
Electron Corp. v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office neutral
coloctapp · 1992
1 sentence

1995See Climax Molybdenum Co. v. Walter, 812 P.2d 1168 (Colo. 1991); Electron Corp. v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office, 833 P.2d 821 (Colo.App.1992); see generally 4 A. Larson, Workmen’s Compensation Law § 95.31 at 17-221 and § 95.40 at 17-239 (1994).

11995–1995
Subsequent Injury Fund v. Grant green
coloctapp · 1991
1 sentence

1991We rejected that argument in Subsequent Injury Fund v. Grant, supra, on the ground that such a result would circumvent the important policy considerations underlying § 8-46-101.

11991–1991
Boise Cascade Corp. v. Starbuck green
or · 1984
2 sentences

1986See, e.g., Scott Co. v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board, 139 Cal.App.3d 98 , 188 Cal.Rptr. 537 (1983); Thermos Co. v. Industrial Commission, 83 Ill.2d 54 , 46 Ill.Dec. 133 , 413 N.E.2d 1246 (1980); Busse v. Quality Insulation Co., 322 N.W.2d 206 (Minn.1982); Halverson v. Larrivy Plumbing & Heating Co., 322 N.W.2d 203 (Minn.1982); Rutledge v. Tultex Corp./Kings Yarn, 308 N.C. 85 , 301 S.E.2d 359 (1983); Boise Cascade Corp. v. Starbuck, 296 Or. 238 , 675 P.2d 1044 (1984); Bracke v. Baza’r, Inc., 293 Or. 239 , 646 P.2d 1330 (1982); Maraney v. Workmens’ Compensation Appeal Board, 66 Pa.Cmwlth.

1986See, e.g., Scott Co. v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board, 139 Cal.App.3d 98 , 188 Cal.Rptr. 537 (1983); Thermos Co. v. Industrial Commission, 83 Ill.2d 54 , 46 Ill.Dec. 133 , 413 N.E.2d 1246 (1980); Busse v. Quality Insulation Co., 322 N.W.2d 206 (Minn.1982); Halverson v. Larrivy Plumbing & Heating Co., 322 N.W.2d 203 (Minn.1982); Rutledge v. Tultex Corp./Kings Yarn, 308 N.C. 85 , 301 S.E.2d 359 (1983); Boise Cascade Corp. v. Starbuck, 296 Or. 238 , 675 P.2d 1044 (1984); Bracke v. Baza’r, Inc., 293 Or. 239 , 646 P.2d 1330 (1982); Maraney v. Workmens’ Compensation Appeal Board, 66 Pa.Cmwlth.

11986–1986
Matter of Compensation of Bracke green
or · 1982
2 sentences

1986See, e.g., Scott Co. v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board, 139 Cal.App.3d 98 , 188 Cal.Rptr. 537 (1983); Thermos Co. v. Industrial Commission, 83 Ill.2d 54 , 46 Ill.Dec. 133 , 413 N.E.2d 1246 (1980); Busse v. Quality Insulation Co., 322 N.W.2d 206 (Minn.1982); Halverson v. Larrivy Plumbing & Heating Co., 322 N.W.2d 203 (Minn.1982); Rutledge v. Tultex Corp./Kings Yarn, 308 N.C. 85 , 301 S.E.2d 359 (1983); Boise Cascade Corp. v. Starbuck, 296 Or. 238 , 675 P.2d 1044 (1984); Bracke v. Baza’r, Inc., 293 Or. 239 , 646 P.2d 1330 (1982); Maraney v. Workmens’ Compensation Appeal Board, 66 Pa.Cmwlth.

1986See, e.g., Scott Co. v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board, 139 Cal.App.3d 98 , 188 Cal.Rptr. 537 (1983); Thermos Co. v. Industrial Commission, 83 Ill.2d 54 , 46 Ill.Dec. 133 , 413 N.E.2d 1246 (1980); Busse v. Quality Insulation Co., 322 N.W.2d 206 (Minn.1982); Halverson v. Larrivy Plumbing & Heating Co., 322 N.W.2d 203 (Minn.1982); Rutledge v. Tultex Corp./Kings Yarn, 308 N.C. 85 , 301 S.E.2d 359 (1983); Boise Cascade Corp. v. Starbuck, 296 Or. 238 , 675 P.2d 1044 (1984); Bracke v. Baza’r, Inc., 293 Or. 239 , 646 P.2d 1330 (1982); Maraney v. Workmens’ Compensation Appeal Board, 66 Pa.Cmwlth.

11986–1986
Maraney v. Commonwealth neutral
pacommwct · 1982
1 sentence

1986See, e.g., Scott Co. v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board, 139 Cal.App.3d 98 , 188 Cal.Rptr. 537 (1983); Thermos Co. v. Industrial Commission, 83 Ill.2d 54 , 46 Ill.Dec. 133 , 413 N.E.2d 1246 (1980); Busse v. Quality Insulation Co., 322 N.W.2d 206 (Minn.1982); Halverson v. Larrivy Plumbing & Heating Co., 322 N.W.2d 203 (Minn.1982); Rutledge v. Tultex Corp./Kings Yarn, 308 N.C. 85 , 301 S.E.2d 359 (1983); Boise Cascade Corp. v. Starbuck, 296 Or. 238 , 675 P.2d 1044 (1984); Bracke v. Baza’r, Inc., 293 Or. 239 , 646 P.2d 1330 (1982); Maraney v. Workmens’ Compensation Appeal Board, 66 Pa.Cmwlth.

11986–1986
Morell v. ASARCO, Inc. green
tenn · 1981
1 sentence

1986See, e.g., Scott Co. v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board, 139 Cal.App.3d 98 , 188 Cal.Rptr. 537 (1983); Thermos Co. v. Industrial Commission, 83 Ill.2d 54 , 46 Ill.Dec. 133 , 413 N.E.2d 1246 (1980); Busse v. Quality Insulation Co., 322 N.W.2d 206 (Minn.1982); Halverson v. Larrivy Plumbing & Heating Co., 322 N.W.2d 203 (Minn.1982); Rutledge v. Tultex Corp./Kings Yarn, 308 N.C. 85 , 301 S.E.2d 359 (1983); Boise Cascade Corp. v. Starbuck, 296 Or. 238 , 675 P.2d 1044 (1984); Bracke v. Baza’r, Inc., 293 Or. 239 , 646 P.2d 1330 (1982); Maraney v. Workmens’ Compensation Appeal Board, 66 Pa.Cmwlth.

11986–1986
Thermos Co. v. Industrial Commission neutral
ill · 1980
2 sentences

1986See, e.g., Scott Co. v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board, 139 Cal.App.3d 98 , 188 Cal.Rptr. 537 (1983); Thermos Co. v. Industrial Commission, 83 Ill.2d 54 , 46 Ill.Dec. 133 , 413 N.E.2d 1246 (1980); Busse v. Quality Insulation Co., 322 N.W.2d 206 (Minn.1982); Halverson v. Larrivy Plumbing & Heating Co., 322 N.W.2d 203 (Minn.1982); Rutledge v. Tultex Corp./Kings Yarn, 308 N.C. 85 , 301 S.E.2d 359 (1983); Boise Cascade Corp. v. Starbuck, 296 Or. 238 , 675 P.2d 1044 (1984); Bracke v. Baza’r, Inc., 293 Or. 239 , 646 P.2d 1330 (1982); Maraney v. Workmens’ Compensation Appeal Board, 66 Pa.Cmwlth.

1986See, e.g., Scott Co. v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board, 139 Cal.App.3d 98 , 188 Cal.Rptr. 537 (1983); Thermos Co. v. Industrial Commission, 83 Ill.2d 54 , 46 Ill.Dec. 133 , 413 N.E.2d 1246 (1980); Busse v. Quality Insulation Co., 322 N.W.2d 206 (Minn.1982); Halverson v. Larrivy Plumbing & Heating Co., 322 N.W.2d 203 (Minn.1982); Rutledge v. Tultex Corp./Kings Yarn, 308 N.C. 85 , 301 S.E.2d 359 (1983); Boise Cascade Corp. v. Starbuck, 296 Or. 238 , 675 P.2d 1044 (1984); Bracke v. Baza’r, Inc., 293 Or. 239 , 646 P.2d 1330 (1982); Maraney v. Workmens’ Compensation Appeal Board, 66 Pa.Cmwlth.

11986–1986
Halverson v. Larrivy Plumbing & Heating Co. green
minn · 1982
1 sentence

1986See, e.g., Scott Co. v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board, 139 Cal.App.3d 98 , 188 Cal.Rptr. 537 (1983); Thermos Co. v. Industrial Commission, 83 Ill.2d 54 , 46 Ill.Dec. 133 , 413 N.E.2d 1246 (1980); Busse v. Quality Insulation Co., 322 N.W.2d 206 (Minn.1982); Halverson v. Larrivy Plumbing & Heating Co., 322 N.W.2d 203 (Minn.1982); Rutledge v. Tultex Corp./Kings Yarn, 308 N.C. 85 , 301 S.E.2d 359 (1983); Boise Cascade Corp. v. Starbuck, 296 Or. 238 , 675 P.2d 1044 (1984); Bracke v. Baza’r, Inc., 293 Or. 239 , 646 P.2d 1330 (1982); Maraney v. Workmens’ Compensation Appeal Board, 66 Pa.Cmwlth.

11986–1986
Busse v. Quality Insulation Co. green
minn · 1982
1 sentence

1986See, e.g., Scott Co. v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board, 139 Cal.App.3d 98 , 188 Cal.Rptr. 537 (1983); Thermos Co. v. Industrial Commission, 83 Ill.2d 54 , 46 Ill.Dec. 133 , 413 N.E.2d 1246 (1980); Busse v. Quality Insulation Co., 322 N.W.2d 206 (Minn.1982); Halverson v. Larrivy Plumbing & Heating Co., 322 N.W.2d 203 (Minn.1982); Rutledge v. Tultex Corp./Kings Yarn, 308 N.C. 85 , 301 S.E.2d 359 (1983); Boise Cascade Corp. v. Starbuck, 296 Or. 238 , 675 P.2d 1044 (1984); Bracke v. Baza’r, Inc., 293 Or. 239 , 646 P.2d 1330 (1982); Maraney v. Workmens’ Compensation Appeal Board, 66 Pa.Cmwlth.

11986–1986
Rutledge v. Tultex Corp./Kings Yarn green
nc · 1983
2 sentences

1986See, e.g., Scott Co. v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board, 139 Cal.App.3d 98 , 188 Cal.Rptr. 537 (1983); Thermos Co. v. Industrial Commission, 83 Ill.2d 54 , 46 Ill.Dec. 133 , 413 N.E.2d 1246 (1980); Busse v. Quality Insulation Co., 322 N.W.2d 206 (Minn.1982); Halverson v. Larrivy Plumbing & Heating Co., 322 N.W.2d 203 (Minn.1982); Rutledge v. Tultex Corp./Kings Yarn, 308 N.C. 85 , 301 S.E.2d 359 (1983); Boise Cascade Corp. v. Starbuck, 296 Or. 238 , 675 P.2d 1044 (1984); Bracke v. Baza’r, Inc., 293 Or. 239 , 646 P.2d 1330 (1982); Maraney v. Workmens’ Compensation Appeal Board, 66 Pa.Cmwlth.

1986See, e.g., Scott Co. v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board, 139 Cal.App.3d 98 , 188 Cal.Rptr. 537 (1983); Thermos Co. v. Industrial Commission, 83 Ill.2d 54 , 46 Ill.Dec. 133 , 413 N.E.2d 1246 (1980); Busse v. Quality Insulation Co., 322 N.W.2d 206 (Minn.1982); Halverson v. Larrivy Plumbing & Heating Co., 322 N.W.2d 203 (Minn.1982); Rutledge v. Tultex Corp./Kings Yarn, 308 N.C. 85 , 301 S.E.2d 359 (1983); Boise Cascade Corp. v. Starbuck, 296 Or. 238 , 675 P.2d 1044 (1984); Bracke v. Baza’r, Inc., 293 Or. 239 , 646 P.2d 1330 (1982); Maraney v. Workmens’ Compensation Appeal Board, 66 Pa.Cmwlth.

11986–1986

Statutes the citing opinions construe

CO § Colo. Rev. Stat. § 8-41-304 (4)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

OR 79 (1975–2020) AK 19 (1980–2020) WA 18 (1991–2014) AL 10 (1999–2014) NV 10 (1985–2019) SD 7 (1997–2009) OK 6 (1988–2007) CO 6 (1986–1999) VT 4 (2002–2006) LA 4 (1986–2007) MD 4 (1984–2023) SC 4 (2007–2010) MT 4 (1994–2018) PA 3 (1988–2006) NE 3 (1981–2003) DE 3 (1986–1990) OH 3 (1989–2008) KS 2 (1989–2007) FL 2 (1992–1995) HI 2 (2000–2000)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check