Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 1986–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. D.K.B.green2 sentences2006In regard to the first prong, we have found that a right is vested only when it has an “independent existence.” People v. D.K.B., 843 P.2d 1326, 1331 (Colo.1993). 2006In regard to the first prong, we have found that a right is vested only when it has an "independent existence." People v. D.K.B., 843 P.2d 1326, 1331 (Colo. 1993). | 1 | 1 |
Taxpayers for the Animas-La Plata Referendum v. Animas-La Plata Water Conservancy Districtgreen2 sentences2000Although the plaintiffs in that case argued "that the motive behind House Bill 1272 was to destroy their pending lawsuit," id., the court observed that: (1) plaintiffs' "rights in challenging the district were inchoate," id. at 1477, and (2) the Assembly's action "was designed to promote what the legislature deemed a 'public purpose' in response to a troublesome situation." Id. at 1478. 2000Although the plaintiffs in that case argued "that the motive behind House Bill 1272 was to destroy their pending lawsuit," id., the court observed that: (1) plaintiffs' "rights in challenging the district were inchoate," id. at 1477, and (2) the Assembly's action "was designed to promote what the legislature deemed a 'public purpose' in response to a troublesome situation." Id. at 1478. | 1 | 1 |
French v. Deanegreen1 sentence1992See French v. Dean, 19 Colo. 504 , 36 P. 609 (1894); Denver, South Park & Pacific Ry. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Timmonsgreen2 sentences1986People v. Timmons, 690 P.2d 213, 215-16 (Colo.1984). 1986People v. Timmons, 690 P.2d 213, 215-16 (Colo.1984). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hill v. DeWitt
green
2 sentences2006A determination that retroactive application of a law impairs a vested right is not dispositive of the retrospectivity inquiry because such a finding “may be balanced against public health and safety concerns, the state’s police powers to regulate certain practices, as well as other public policy considerations.” Id. 2006A determination that retroactive application of a law impairs a vested right is not dispositive of the retrospectivity inquiry because such a finding "may be balanced against public health and safety concerns, the state's police powers to regulate certain practices, as well as other public policy considerations." Id. | 2 | 2006–2010 |
City of Golden v. Parker
green
2 sentences2014Id. 2014Id. at 290 . ¶ 22 A determination that retroactive application of a law impairs a vested right, however, is not necessarily dispositive of the retrospectivity inquiry because such a finding may be balanced against public health and safety concerns, the state's police powers to regulate certain practices, and other public policy considerations. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Stovall v. Denno
green
2 sentences1986This court has followed the lead of the United States Supreme Court in determining the retrospectivity of a rule of criminal procedure, but on fourth amendment questions we have not chosen between the retrospectivity analysis set forth in Stovall v. Denno, 388 U.S. 293 , 87 S.Ct. 1967 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1199 (1967), and the “bright line” approach announced later in United States v. Johnson, 457 U.S. 537 , 102 S.Ct. 2579 , 73 L.Ed.2d 202 (1982). 1986This court has followed the lead of the United States Supreme Court in determining the retrospectivity of a rule of criminal procedure, but on fourth amendment questions we have not chosen between the retrospectivity analysis set forth in Stovall v. Denno, 388 U.S. 293 , 87 S.Ct. 1967 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1199 (1967), and the “bright line” approach announced later in United States v. Johnson, 457 U.S. 537 , 102 S.Ct. 2579 , 73 L.Ed.2d 202 (1982). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
United States v. Johnson
yellow
2 sentences1986This court has followed the lead of the United States Supreme Court in determining the retrospectivity of a rule of criminal procedure, but on fourth amendment questions we have not chosen between the retrospectivity analysis set forth in Stovall v. Denno, 388 U.S. 293 , 87 S.Ct. 1967 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1199 (1967), and the “bright line” approach announced later in United States v. Johnson, 457 U.S. 537 , 102 S.Ct. 2579 , 73 L.Ed.2d 202 (1982). 1986This court has followed the lead of the United States Supreme Court in determining the retrospectivity of a rule of criminal procedure, but on fourth amendment questions we have not chosen between the retrospectivity analysis set forth in Stovall v. Denno, 388 U.S. 293 , 87 S.Ct. 1967 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1199 (1967), and the “bright line” approach announced later in United States v. Johnson, 457 U.S. 537 , 102 S.Ct. 2579 , 73 L.Ed.2d 202 (1982). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.