Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Colorado opinions name it 1 courts 1980–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In re the Title, Ballot Title, Submission Clause, & Summary, Adopted August 26, 1991, Pertaining to the Proposed Initiative on Education Tax Refundgreen2 sentences2004See § 1-40-106(1), 1 C.R.S. (2003) (directing the state title board to "designate and fix a proper fair title for each proposed law or constitutional amendment, together with a submission clause, at public meetings"); see also § 1-40-106(3)(b) (stating that "[i]n setting a title, the title board shall consider the public confusion that might be caused by misleading titles and shall, whenever practicable, avoid titles for which the general understanding of the effect of a `yes' or `no' vote will be unclear"); § 1-40-107(1) (permitting a registered voter not satisfied with the decision of the ti 2004See § 1-40-106(1), 1 C.R.S. (2008) (directing the state title board to "designate and fix a proper fair title for each proposed law or constitutional amendment, together with a submission clause, at public meetings"); see also § 1-40-106(8)(b) (stating that "[in setting a title, the title board shall consider the public confusion that might be caused by misleading titles and shall, whenever practicable, avoid titles for which the general understanding of the effect of a 'yes' or 'no' vote will be unclear"); § 1-40-107(1) (permitting a registered voter not satisfied with the decision of the tit | 1 | 2 |
Armstrong v. Davidsongreen1 sentence2013See Armstrong, 10 P.3d at 1282-83 ; see also § 1-40-107(4) ("No petition for any initiative measure shall be circulated nor any signature thereto have any force or effect which has been signed before the titles and submission clause have been fixed and determined as provided in section 1-40-106 and this section."). 1125 Contrary to Respondents' suggestion, the rehearing is not simply a "procedural" hearing. | 1 | 1 |
In Re Proposed Initiative Concerning \State Personnel System\""green1 sentence1990We reject these arguments. “[T]he board need not and cannot describe every feature of a proposed measure in the titles and submission clause.” Initiative Concerning “State Personnel System”, 691 P.2d at 1124; see also Constitutional Amendment Under the Designation “Pregnancy”, 757 P.2d at 136 . | 1 | 1 |
Matter of Proposed Constitutional Amend.green1 sentence1990We reject these arguments. “[T]he board need not and cannot describe every feature of a proposed measure in the titles and submission clause.” Initiative Concerning “State Personnel System”, 691 P.2d at 1124; see also Constitutional Amendment Under the Designation “Pregnancy”, 757 P.2d at 136 . | 1 | 1 |
In re the Title, Ballot Title & Submission Clause, & Summary Pertaining to the Sale of Table Wine in Grocery Stores Initiative Adopted on March 24, 1982green1 sentence1984See In re Title, Ballot Title & Submission Clause, & Summary Pertaining to the Sale of Table Wine, 646 P.2d 916 (Colo.1982). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re: Second Initiated Constitutional Amendment Respecting Rights of the Public to Uninterrupted Service by Public Employees of 1980
green
2 sentences1984In re Second Initiated Constitutional Amendment Respecting the Rights of the Public to Uninterrupted Service by Public Employees, 200 Colo. 141 , 613 P.2d 867 (1980). 1984In re Second Initiated Constitutional Amendment Respecting the Rights of the Public to Uninterrupted Service by Public Employees, 200 Colo. 141 , 613 P.2d 867 (1980). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Dye v. Baker
green
2 sentences1980Cf. Dye v. Baker, 143 Colo. 458 , 354 P.2d 498 (1960) (purpose of submission clause is to “fairly and succinctly advise the voters ... so that in the haste of an election the voter will not be misled . . . .”). 1980Cf. Dye v. Baker, 143 Colo. 458 , 354 P.2d 498 (1960) (purpose of submission clause is to “fairly and succinctly advise the voters ... so that in the haste of an election the voter will not be misled . . . .”). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.