Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1997–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Weiss v. Weiss
green
2 sentences2022Stated another way, res judicata is based on the public policy that a party should not be able to relitigate a matter which it already has had an opportunity to litigate. . . . [W]here a party has fully and fairly liti- gated his claims, he may be barred from future actions on matters not raised in the prior proceeding.’’ (Cita- tions omitted; emphasis in original; internal quotation marks omitted.) Weiss v. Weiss, 297 Conn. 446 , 459–60, 998 A.2d 766 (2010). ‘‘[A]lthough parties are not required to resolve all disputes during a . . . proceeding, when a party had the opportunity to raise the c 2022Stated another way, res judicata is based on the public policy that a party should not be able to relitigate a matter which it already has had an opportunity to litigate. . . . [W]here a party has fully and fairly liti- gated his claims, he may be barred from future actions on matters not raised in the prior proceeding.’’ (Cita- tions omitted; emphasis in original; internal quotation marks omitted.) Weiss v. Weiss, 297 Conn. 446 , 459–60, 998 A.2d 766 (2010). ‘‘[A]lthough parties are not required to resolve all disputes during a . . . proceeding, when a party had the opportunity to raise the c | 3 | 2018–2022 |
Estes v. Texas
green
2 sentences2024The central purpose of a criminal trial is ‘‘to ascertain the truth which is the sine qua non of a fair trial.’’ Estes v. Texas, 381 U.S. 532, 540 , 85 S. Ct. 1628 , 14 L. 2024The central purpose of a criminal trial is ‘‘to ascertain the truth which is the sine qua non of a fair trial.’’ Estes v. Texas, 381 U.S. 532, 540 , 85 S. Ct. 1628 , 14 L. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Fisk v. BL Cos.
green
2 sentences2022Stated another way, res judicata is based on the public policy that a party should not be able to relitigate a matter which it already has had an opportunity to litigate. . . . [W]here a party has fully and fairly liti- gated his claims, he may be barred from future actions on matters not raised in the prior proceeding.’’ (Cita- tions omitted; emphasis in original; internal quotation marks omitted.) Weiss v. Weiss, 297 Conn. 446 , 459–60, 998 A.2d 766 (2010). ‘‘[A]lthough parties are not required to resolve all disputes during a . . . proceeding, when a party had the opportunity to raise the c 2022Stated another way, res judicata is based on the public policy that a party should not be able to relitigate a matter which it already has had an opportunity to litigate. . . . [W]here a party has fully and fairly liti- gated his claims, he may be barred from future actions on matters not raised in the prior proceeding.’’ (Cita- tions omitted; emphasis in original; internal quotation marks omitted.) Weiss v. Weiss, 297 Conn. 446 , 459–60, 998 A.2d 766 (2010). ‘‘[A]lthough parties are not required to resolve all disputes during a . . . proceeding, when a party had the opportunity to raise the c | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Wiegand v. Wiegand
green
2 sentences2016In the absence of an objection and an adequate record in the trial court, this court should not countenance such claims by reviewing them unless the record demonstrates ... that a reasonable person would conclude that the proceeding fundamentally was unfair." (Footnote omitted.) Wiegand v. Wiegand, 129 Conn.App. 526 , 543-44, 21 A.3d 489 (2011) ( Lavine, J., concurring). 2016In the absence of an objection and an adequate record in the trial court, this court should not countenance such claims by reviewing them unless the record demonstrates ... that a reasonable person would conclude that the proceeding fundamentally was unfair." (Footnote omitted.) Wiegand v. Wiegand, 129 Conn.App. 526 , 543-44, 21 A.3d 489 (2011) ( Lavine, J., concurring). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Orselet v. DeMatteo
green
1 sentence1997Orselet, supra, 545 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.