Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Connecticut opinions name it 1 courts 1992–2000 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Bernard v. Gershmangreen2 sentences1998See Practice Book § 438. 1 In addition, "[a] party may file objections to the acceptance of the report on the grounds that conclusions of fact stated therein were not supported by the subordinate facts found, or that the referee erred in his [or her] rulings." Bernard v. Gershman, 18 Conn. App. 652 , 655 , 559 A.2d 1171 (1989); Practice Book § 440. 2 On December 16, 1997, the plaintiff filed a motion entitled "Plaintiff's Objection to Acceptance of Findings of Fact." The plaintiff fails to indicate under which Practice Book section it moves; the defendants characterize the objection as one mad 1998See Practice Book § 438. 1 In addition, "[a] party may file objections to the acceptance of the report on the grounds that conclusions of fact stated therein were not supported by the subordinate facts found, or that the referee erred in his [or her] rulings." Bernard v. Gershman, 18 Conn. App. 652 , 655 , 559 A.2d 1171 (1989); Practice Book § 440. 2 On December 16, 1997, the plaintiff filed a motion entitled "Plaintiff's Objection to Acceptance of Findings of Fact." The plaintiff fails to indicate under which Practice Book section it moves; the defendants characterize the objection as one mad | 1 | 1 |
Whewell v. Ivesgreen2 sentences1995I When a party challenges the facts in an attorney trial referee's report, the trial court will not "correct a finding of fact unless a material fact has been found without evidence or the [referee] has failed to find an admitted or undisputed fact, or has found a fact in such doubtful language that its real meaning does not appear." Bowman v. 1477 Central Avenue Apartments, Inc., 203 Conn. 246 , 253 n. 7, 524 A.2d 610 (1987), quoting Practice Book § 439; see Whewell v. Ives, 155 Conn. 602 , 608-09 , 236 A.2d 92 (1957) (holding that trial court did not err in rejecting plaintiff's claim that t 1995I When a party challenges the facts in an attorney trial referee's report, the trial court will not "correct a finding of fact unless a material fact has been found without evidence or the [referee] has failed to find an admitted or undisputed fact, or has found a fact in such doubtful language that its real meaning does not appear." Bowman v. 1477 Central Avenue Apartments, Inc., 203 Conn. 246 , 253 n. 7, 524 A.2d 610 (1987), quoting Practice Book § 439; see Whewell v. Ives, 155 Conn. 602 , 608-09 , 236 A.2d 92 (1957) (holding that trial court did not err in rejecting plaintiff's claim that t | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bombero v. Planning & Zoning Commission
green
2 sentences1999There are many instances where, because of the procedural posture of the case, he may have no practical choice but to raise his challenge in the context of an appeal." Bombero v. Planning Zoning Commission , 218 Conn, 737 , 744-45 , 591 A.2d 390 (1991). 1999There are many instances where, because of the procedural posture of the case, he may have no practical choice but to raise his challenge in the context of an appeal." Bombero v. Planning Zoning Commission , 218 Conn, 737 , 744-45 , 591 A.2d 390 (1991). | 3 | 1992–1999 |
Gordon v. Bridgeport Housing Authority
green
2 sentences2000Gordon v. CT Page 6702 Bridgeport Housing Authority, 208 Conn. 161 , 170 , 544 A.2d 1185 , (1988). 2000Gordon v. CT Page 6702 Bridgeport Housing Authority, 208 Conn. 161 , 170 , 544 A.2d 1185 , (1988). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Bowman v. 1477 Central Avenue Apartments, Inc.
green
2 sentences1995I When a party challenges the facts in an attorney trial referee's report, the trial court will not "correct a finding of fact unless a material fact has been found without evidence or the [referee] has failed to find an admitted or undisputed fact, or has found a fact in such doubtful language that its real meaning does not appear." Bowman v. 1477 Central Avenue Apartments, Inc., 203 Conn. 246 , 253 n. 7, 524 A.2d 610 (1987), quoting Practice Book § 439; see Whewell v. Ives, 155 Conn. 602 , 608-09 , 236 A.2d 92 (1957) (holding that trial court did not err in rejecting plaintiff's claim that t 1995I When a party challenges the facts in an attorney trial referee's report, the trial court will not "correct a finding of fact unless a material fact has been found without evidence or the [referee] has failed to find an admitted or undisputed fact, or has found a fact in such doubtful language that its real meaning does not appear." Bowman v. 1477 Central Avenue Apartments, Inc., 203 Conn. 246 , 253 n. 7, 524 A.2d 610 (1987), quoting Practice Book § 439; see Whewell v. Ives, 155 Conn. 602 , 608-09 , 236 A.2d 92 (1957) (holding that trial court did not err in rejecting plaintiff's claim that t | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.