probable validity claim (Connecticut) · Go Syfert
← Connecticut issues

probable validity claim in Connecticut

6 Connecticut opinions name it 2 courts 1981–1997 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
McCahill v. Town & Country Associates, Ltd. green
conn · 1981
2 sentences

1997The Court is provided with further guidance of its role in a hearing upon an application for a prejudgment remedy hearing by reference to McCahill v. Town Country Associates Ltd. , 185 Conn. 37 , 39 (1981) wherein the Court noted that "The plaintiff is not required to establish her case by a fair preponderance of the evidence but need only show the probable validity of her claim." As regards the rights of a party resisting an application, our Supreme Court has held that since a person's property rights would be affected by the granting of any prejudgment remedy, due process requires that a par

1997The Court is provided with further guidance of its role in a hearing upon an application for a prejudgment remedy hearing by reference to McCahill v. Town Country Associates Ltd., 185 Conn. 37 , 39 (1981) wherein the Court noted that "The plaintiff is not required to establish her case by a fair preponderance of the evidence but need only show the probable validity of her claim." As regards the rights of a party resisting an application, our Supreme Court has held that since a person's property rights would be affected by the granting of any prejudgment remedy, due process requires that a part

41993–1997
Ledgebrook Condominium Assn., Inc. v. Lusk Corporation green
conn · 1977
2 sentences

1997Inc. v. Lusk Corporation , 172 Conn. 577 , 583 (1977).

1997Inc. v. Lusk Corporation, 172 Conn. 577 , 583 (1977).

21997–1997
Augeri v. C. F. Wooding Co. green
conn · 1977
2 sentences

1991Augeri, 173 Conn. at 428 .

1981Id., 428 .

21981–1991

Where else courts name it

CA 23 (1977–2026) CT 6 (1981–1997) TX 3 (2017–2017)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check