Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Connecticut opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Johnson v. Zerbst
green
2 sentences1996In accordance with the well established test of Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464 , 58 S. Ct. 1019 , 82 L. 1996In accordance with the well established test of Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464 , 58 S. Ct. 1019 , 82 L. | 2 | 1989–1996 |
State v. Johnson
green
2 sentences2026Page 68 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL February 3, 2026 132 FEBRUARY, 2026 354 Conn. 96 State v. Johnson to adequately safeguard a suspect’s right to the advice of counsel during a custodial interrogation and indeed is antithetical to the purpose of Miranda warnings, which is to “show the individual that his interrogators are prepared to recognize his privilege should he choose to exercise it.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Id., quoting Miranda v. Arizona, supra, 384 U.S. 468 . 2026Page 68 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL February 3, 2026 132 FEBRUARY, 2026 354 Conn. 96 State v. Johnson to adequately safeguard a suspect’s right to the advice of counsel during a custodial interrogation and indeed is antithetical to the purpose of Miranda warnings, which is to “show the individual that his interrogators are prepared to recognize his privilege should he choose to exercise it.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Id., quoting Miranda v. Arizona, supra, 384 U.S. 468 . | 1 | 2026–2026 |
In re Enrique S.
green
2 sentences2010In re Enrique S., 32 Conn. App. 431, 436 , 629 A.2d 476 (1993).” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) In re Kevin K., supra, 217. 2010In re Enrique S., 32 Conn. App. 431, 436 , 629 A.2d 476 (1993).” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) In re Kevin K., supra, 217. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
State v. Shifflett
green
2 sentences1998“The state has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his Miranda rights, including his right to remain silent.” State v. Barrett, 205 Conn. 437, 449 , 534 A.2d 219 (1987). “[T]he state must demonstrate: (1) that the defendant understood his rights, and (2) that the defendant’s course of conduct indicated that he did, in fact, waive those rights.” (Emphasis in original; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Shifflett, 199 Conn. 718, 731-32 , 508 A.2d 748 (1986). 1998“The state has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his Miranda rights, including his right to remain silent.” State v. Barrett, 205 Conn. 437, 449 , 534 A.2d 219 (1987). “[T]he state must demonstrate: (1) that the defendant understood his rights, and (2) that the defendant’s course of conduct indicated that he did, in fact, waive those rights.” (Emphasis in original; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Shifflett, 199 Conn. 718, 731-32 , 508 A.2d 748 (1986). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
State v. Barrett
green
2 sentences1998“The state has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his Miranda rights, including his right to remain silent.” State v. Barrett, 205 Conn. 437, 449 , 534 A.2d 219 (1987). “[T]he state must demonstrate: (1) that the defendant understood his rights, and (2) that the defendant’s course of conduct indicated that he did, in fact, waive those rights.” (Emphasis in original; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Shifflett, 199 Conn. 718, 731-32 , 508 A.2d 748 (1986). 1998“The state has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his Miranda rights, including his right to remain silent.” State v. Barrett, 205 Conn. 437, 449 , 534 A.2d 219 (1987). “[T]he state must demonstrate: (1) that the defendant understood his rights, and (2) that the defendant’s course of conduct indicated that he did, in fact, waive those rights.” (Emphasis in original; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Shifflett, 199 Conn. 718, 731-32 , 508 A.2d 748 (1986). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
State v. Madera
green
2 sentences1996The purpose of Miranda warnings is to assure that a confession is the product of an “essentially free and unconstrained choice by its maker.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Madera, 210 Conn. 22, 48 , 554 A.2d 263 (1989). 1996The purpose of Miranda warnings is to assure that a confession is the product of an “essentially free and unconstrained choice by its maker.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Madera, 210 Conn. 22, 48 , 554 A.2d 263 (1989). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
State v. Burge
green
2 sentences1989“The purpose of Miranda warnings is to assure that a confession is ‘ “the product of an essentially free and unconstrained choice by its maker.” ' State v. Derrico, [supra, 163 ], quoting Culombe v. Connecticut, [supra, 602 ].” State v. Burge, 195 Conn. 232, 247 , 487 A.2d 532 (1985). 1989“The purpose of Miranda warnings is to assure that a confession is ‘ “the product of an essentially free and unconstrained choice by its maker.” ' State v. Derrico, [supra, 163 ], quoting Culombe v. Connecticut, [supra, 602 ].” State v. Burge, 195 Conn. 232, 247 , 487 A.2d 532 (1985). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
State v. Derrico
green
2 sentences1985The purpose of Miranda warnings is to assure that a confession is “ ‘the product of an essentially free and unconstrained choice by its maker.’ ” State v. Derrico, 181 Conn. 151, 163 , 434 A.2d 356 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1064 , 101 S. Ct. 789 , 66 L. 1985The purpose of Miranda warnings is to assure that a confession is “ ‘the product of an essentially free and unconstrained choice by its maker.’ ” State v. Derrico, 181 Conn. 151, 163 , 434 A.2d 356 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1064 , 101 S. Ct. 789 , 66 L. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Culombe v. Connecticut
green
2 sentences1985Ed. 2d 607 (1980), quoting Culombe v. Connecticut, 367 U.S. 568, 602 , 81 S. Ct. 1860 , 6 L. 1985Ed. 2d 607 (1980), quoting Culombe v. Connecticut, 367 U.S. 568, 602 , 81 S. Ct. 1860 , 6 L. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
McClain v. Oklahoma
green
1 sentence1985The purpose of Miranda warnings is to assure that a confession is “ ‘the product of an essentially free and unconstrained choice by its maker.’ ” State v. Derrico, 181 Conn. 151, 163 , 434 A.2d 356 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1064 , 101 S. Ct. 789 , 66 L. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Nash v. Reedel
green
1 sentence1985The purpose of Miranda warnings is to assure that a confession is “ ‘the product of an essentially free and unconstrained choice by its maker.’ ” State v. Derrico, 181 Conn. 151, 163 , 434 A.2d 356 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1064 , 101 S. Ct. 789 , 66 L. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Payne v. Thompson
green
1 sentence1985The purpose of Miranda warnings is to assure that a confession is “ ‘the product of an essentially free and unconstrained choice by its maker.’ ” State v. Derrico, 181 Conn. 151, 163 , 434 A.2d 356 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1064 , 101 S. Ct. 789 , 66 L. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.