Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Connecticut opinions name it 2 courts 1998–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
McCarthy v. Commissioner of Correctiongreen2 sentences2010In the Pineview case, the defendant was charged with kidnapping in the first degree in violation of § 53a-92 (a) (2) (B), conspiracy to commit kidnapping in the first degree in violation of §§ 53a-48 and 53a-92 (a) (2) (B), robbery in the first degree in violation of § 53a-134 (a) (3), conspiracy to commit robbery in the first degree in violation of §§ 53a-48 and 53a-134 (a) (3), burglary in the second degree in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 2005) § 53a-102 (a), conspiracy to commit burglary in the second degree in violation of § 53a-48 and General Statutes (Rev. to 2005) § 53a-102 (a 2010In the Pineview case, the defendant was charged with kidnapping in the first degree in violation of § 53a-92 (a) (2) (B), conspiracy to commit kidnapping in the first degree in violation of §§ 53a-48 and 53a-92 (a) (2) (B), robbery in the first degree in violation of § 53a-134 (a) (3), conspiracy to commit robbery in the first degree in violation of §§ 53a-48 and 53a-134 (a) (3), burglary in the second degree in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 2005) § 53a-102 (a), conspiracy to commit burglary in the second degree in violation of § 53a-48 and General Statutes (Rev. to 2005) § 53a-102 (a | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Schovanec
green
2 sentences2019Specifically, the defendant points to several statements made by the state during closing argument, suggesting that the state misled the jury into considering evidence related to the situational risk of injury to a child charge under § 53-21 (a) (1) when discussing the sexual contact risk of injury charge under § 53-21 (a) (2) and vice versa. 5 We are not persuaded. *1052 *547 In State v. Schovanec , supra, 326 Conn. at 312 -17 , 163 A.3d 581 , the defendant was convicted of identity theft in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-129d, credit card theft in violation of Genera 2019Specifically, the defendant points to several statements made by the state during closing argument, suggesting that the state misled the jury into considering evidence related to the situational risk of injury to a child charge under § 53-21 (a) (1) when discussing the sexual contact risk of injury charge under § 53-21 (a) (2) and vice versa. 5 We are not persuaded. *1052 *547 In State v. Schovanec , supra, 326 Conn. at 312 -17 , 163 A.3d 581 , the defendant was convicted of identity theft in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-129d, credit card theft in violation of Genera | 1 | 2019–2019 |
State v. Akande
neutral
2 sentences2011The defendant, Jason Shola Akande, appeals from the judgment of the Appellate Court affirming his conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of two counts of forgery in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-139 (a)(1) and (2), [1] and two counts of larceny in the sixth degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-119 (2) [2] and 53a-125b. [3] State v. Akande, 111 Conn.App. 596, 614 , 960 A.2d 1045 (2008). 2011The defendant, Jason Shola Akande, appeals from the judgment of the Appellate Court affirming his conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of two counts of forgery in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-139 (a)(1) and (2), [1] and two counts of larceny in the sixth degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-119 (2) [2] and 53a-125b. [3] State v. Akande, 111 Conn.App. 596, 614 , 960 A.2d 1045 (2008). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
State v. Robles
green
2 sentences2011State v. William C., 103 Conn. App. 508, 510 , 930 A.2d 753 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 928 , 934 A.2d 244 (2007). 2011State v. William C., 103 Conn. App. 508, 510 , 930 A.2d 753 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 928 , 934 A.2d 244 (2007). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
State v. WILLIAM C.
green
2 sentences2011State v. William C., 103 Conn. App. 508, 510 , 930 A.2d 753 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 928 , 934 A.2d 244 (2007). 2011State v. William C., 103 Conn. App. 508, 510 , 930 A.2d 753 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 928 , 934 A.2d 244 (2007). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
State v. Akande
green
2 sentences2011We granted certification to appeal limited to the following issue: "Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the defendant waived his claim that the jury instructions were constitutionally deficient?" State v. Akande, 290 Conn. 918, 919 , 966 A.2d 237 (2009). 2011We granted certification to appeal limited to the following issue: "Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the defendant waived his claim that the jury instructions were constitutionally deficient?" State v. Akande, 290 Conn. 918, 919 , 966 A.2d 237 (2009). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
State v. Whistnant
green
1 sentence2000The four conditions that must be met for a defendant to be entitled to an instruction on a lesser included offense are set out in State v. Whistnant, 179 Conn. 576 , 427 A.2d 914 (1980). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Miranda v. Arizona
green
2 sentences1998Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S. Ct. 1602 , 16 L. 1998Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S. Ct. 1602 , 16 L. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.