third part test in Connecticut

2022Id. . . . [T]he trial court explained that, ‘[d]ue to the COVID-19 . . . pandemic, the trial [on the termination of parental rights petition] was con- ducted virtually.’ As a result, we would need to consider the specific factual circumstances surrounding the trial and the COVID-19 pandemic to properly evaluate Valer- ie’s claim.

2022Id.

1997The state argues that the test results need not be suppressed because (1) the search was conducted incident to exigent circumstances, (2) the search was made pursuant to the police’s investigatory function rather than their community caretaking function and, therefore, Joyce is inapplicable, (3) the search was similar to the search made incident to the arrest in State v. Castagna, 170 Conn. 80 , 364 A.2d 200 (1976), and thus that case controls. 1 The four samples of charred wood flooring were seized by the fire marshal investigators at the scene of the fire during their cause and origin invest

1997The state argues that the test results need not be suppressed because (1) the search was conducted incident to exigent circumstances, (2) the search was made pursuant to the police’s investigatory function rather than their community caretaking function and, therefore, Joyce is inapplicable, (3) the search was similar to the search made incident to the arrest in State v. Castagna, 170 Conn. 80 , 364 A.2d 200 (1976), and thus that case controls. 1 The four samples of charred wood flooring were seized by the fire marshal investigators at the scene of the fire during their cause and origin invest

1992Moreover, section 22a-424 (g) of the General Statutes requires the Commissioner to hold such hearings as may be required under the Connecticut Water Pollution Control statutes (Chapter 446K) and the FWPCA or other applicable federal law, and section 22a-424 (k) gives the Commissioner the power and duty "[t]o exercise all incidental powers necessary to carry out the purposes of this chapter and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act." It was recently recognized in New England Dairies, Inc. v. Commissioner of Agriculture, 221 Conn. 422 , 427 , that in order to have a contested case, the issue m

1992This case is also different from Taylor v. Robinson, supra, (no apparent statutory requirement for a parole release hearing) and Herman v. Division of Special Revenue, supra, (reinstatement requests by a patron of a Jai Alai facility) where a hearing was held by the state agency even though the agency had no statutory requirement to decide the issue or hold the hearing.

1992Moreover, section 22a-424 (g) of the General Statutes requires the Commissioner to hold such hearings as may be required under the Connecticut Water Pollution Control statutes (Chapter 446K) and the FWPCA or other applicable federal law, and section 22a-424 (k) gives the Commissioner the power and duty "[t]o exercise all incidental powers necessary to carry out the purposes of this chapter and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act." It was recently recognized in New England Dairies, Inc. v. Commissioner of Agriculture, 221 Conn. 422 , 427 , that in order to have a contested case, the issue m

1992Rawling v. New Haven, 206 Conn. 100 , 107 , referencing McNamara v. Hamden, supra. As stated in Rawling, Under the law of workers' compensation, no bright line test distinguishes activities that are incidental to employment from those that constitute a substantial deviation therefrom.

1992This case is also different from Taylor v. Robinson, supra, (no apparent statutory requirement for a parole release hearing) and Herman v. Division of Special Revenue, supra, (reinstatement requests by a patron of a Jai Alai facility) where a hearing was held by the state agency even though the agency had no statutory requirement to decide the issue or hold the hearing.

1992Rawling v. New Haven, 206 Conn. 100 , 107 , referencing McNamara v. Hamden, supra. As stated in Rawling, Under the law of workers' compensation, no bright line test distinguishes activities that are incidental to employment from those that constitute a substantial deviation therefrom.