Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 District of Columbia opinions name it 1 courts 2009–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by District of Columbia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Travelers Indemnity Co. of Illinois v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Servicesgreen2 sentences2021Co. of Ill. v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Emp’t Servs., 975 A.2d 823, 829 (D.C. 2009) (“Once an application for a formal hearing is filed . . . all informal procedures must be terminated.”) (quoting Nat’l Geographic Soc’y, 721 A.2d at 622 )). 2019Participation in the conference is voluntary, 7 DCMR § 219.2, and, if either party applies for a formal hearing, informal procedures must terminate. 7 DCMR 9 § 219.23; see National Geographic Soc’y, 721 A.2d at 622 (“Once an application for a formal hearing is filed . . . all informal procedures must be terminated.” (citing 7 DCMR § 219.23)); Travelers, 975 A.2d at 829 (“[T]he initial filing of an application for a formal hearing [is] the point when the informal procedures ‘terminate.’” (citing 7 DCMR § 219.23)). | 3 | 5 |
National Geographic Society v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Servicesgreen2 sentences2021Co. of Ill. v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Emp’t Servs., 975 A.2d 823, 829 (D.C. 2009) (“Once an application for a formal hearing is filed . . . all informal procedures must be terminated.”) (quoting Nat’l Geographic Soc’y, 721 A.2d at 622 )). 2019Participation in the conference is voluntary, 7 DCMR § 219.2, and, if either party applies for a formal hearing, informal procedures must terminate. 7 DCMR 9 § 219.23; see National Geographic Soc’y, 721 A.2d at 622 (“Once an application for a formal hearing is filed . . . all informal procedures must be terminated.” (citing 7 DCMR § 219.23)); Travelers, 975 A.2d at 829 (“[T]he initial filing of an application for a formal hearing [is] the point when the informal procedures ‘terminate.’” (citing 7 DCMR § 219.23)). | 1 | 3 |
Goba v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Servicesgreen1 sentence2019Co. of Ill. v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Emp’t Servs., 975 A.2d 823, 829 (D.C. 2009), but it does not follow that a litigant may apply for such a hearing at any time, nor does it (continued . . .) 50 Goba v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Emp’t Servs., 960 A.2d 591, 594 (D.C. 2008) (“An interpretation of the statute that nullifies some of its language is neither reasonable nor permissible.”); Providence Hosp. v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Emp’t Servs., 855 A.2d 1108, 1114 (D.C. 2004) (“Each provision of the statute should be given effect, so as not to read any language out of a statute w | 1 | 1 |
Providence Hospital v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Servicesgreen1 sentence2019Co. of Ill. v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Emp’t Servs., 975 A.2d 823, 829 (D.C. 2009), but it does not follow that a litigant may apply for such a hearing at any time, nor does it (continued . . .) 50 Goba v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Emp’t Servs., 960 A.2d 591, 594 (D.C. 2008) (“An interpretation of the statute that nullifies some of its language is neither reasonable nor permissible.”); Providence Hosp. v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Emp’t Servs., 855 A.2d 1108, 1114 (D.C. 2004) (“Each provision of the statute should be given effect, so as not to read any language out of a statute w | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in District of Columbia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.