antitrust violation in Florida

6 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 1984–2024 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (6)

Case	Followed	Cited
Mark F. Bailey v. ERG Enterprises, LPgreen ca11 · 2013 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024 1 sentence 2024Fla. Sept. 25, 2019) (deposit agreement’s broad jury waiver encompassed malicious prosecution claim). 1 Previously, the trial court had dismissed an antitrust claim for various reasons. 3 “A claim ‘relates to’ a contract when ‘the dispute occurs as a fairly direct result of the performance of contractual duties.’” Bailey v. ERG Enters., LP, 705 F.3d 1311, 1317 (11th Cir. 2013) (citation omitted).	1	1
Green v. Royal Palm Beach Colony, Inc.green fladistctapp · 1974 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 1993–1993 1 sentence 1993Compare Green v. Royal Palm Beach Colony, Inc., 292 So.2d 388 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974) (letter which merely stated that plaintiff would be employed by the defendant during the seasonal months of its business for three years did not contain the essential terms of the employment contract with the degree of certainty by which they could be known or understood without recourse to parole evidence and therefore did not satisfy the statute of frauds); Socarras v. Claughton Hotels, Inc., 374 So.2d 1057 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 385 So.2d 760 (Fla.1980) (note signed by vender which failed to identify	1	1
Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. Hydered scotus · 1984 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 1985–1985 2 sentences 1985The U.S. Supreme Court referred recently to a "hospital's unquestioned right to exercise some control over the identity and the number of doctors to whom it accords staff privileges." Jefferson Parish, ___ U.S. at ___, 104 S.Ct. at 1568 , 80 L.Ed.2d at 24 . [2] The Supreme Court also recognized that the effect at a hospital upon the quality of medical services of particular conduct which is claimed to constitute an antitrust violation is a relevant consideration in determining the legality of that conduct. 1985The U.S. Supreme Court referred recently to a "hospital's unquestioned right to exercise some control over the identity and the number of doctors to whom it accords staff privileges." Jefferson Parish, ___ U.S. at ___, 104 S.Ct. at 1568 , 80 L.Ed.2d at 24 . [2] The Supreme Court also recognized that the effect at a hospital upon the quality of medical services of particular conduct which is claimed to constitute an antitrust violation is a relevant consideration in determining the legality of that conduct.	1	1
United States v. Colgate & Co.green scotus · 1919 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 1984–1984 2 sentences 1984See United States v. Colgate & Co., 250 U.S. 300 , 39 S.Ct. 465 , 63 L.Ed. 992 (1919), and Oreck, 579 F.2d at 133 . 1984See United States v. Colgate & Co., 250 U.S. 300 , 39 S.Ct. 465 , 63 L.Ed. 992 (1919), and Oreck, 579 F.2d at 133 .	1	1
Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.green scotus · 1977 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 1984–1984 2 sentences 1984Borrowing from the U.S. Supreme Court's language in Sylvania, "[t]his case presents important questions concerning the appropriate antitrust analysis" and is a "subject of considerable commercial importance." 433 U.S. at 37, 49 , 97 S.Ct. at 2551, 2557 , 53 L.Ed.2d at 579 . 1984Borrowing from the U.S. Supreme Court's language in Sylvania, "[t]his case presents important questions concerning the appropriate antitrust analysis" and is a "subject of considerable commercial importance." 433 U.S. at 37, 49 , 97 S.Ct. at 2551, 2557 , 53 L.Ed.2d at 579 .	1	1
Oreck Corporation v. Whirlpool Corporation and Sears, Roebuck & Co.green ca2 · 1978 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 1984–1984 1 sentence 1984See United States v. Colgate & Co., 250 U.S. 300 , 39 S.Ct. 465 , 63 L.Ed. 992 (1919), and Oreck, 579 F.2d at 133 .	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (12)

Case	Cited	Years
Federal Baseball Club of Baltimore, Inc. v. National League of Professional Baseball Clubs green scotus · 1922 2 sentences 1995Turning to the antitrust claim, the defendants, relying on the United States Supreme Court decisions supporting baseball's exemption from antitrust laws, Federal Base Ball Club of Baltimore v. National League, 259 U.S. 200 , 42 S.Ct. 465 , 66 L.Ed. 898 (1922); Toolson v. New York Yankees, Inc., 346 U.S. 356 , 74 S.Ct. 78 , 98 L.Ed. 64 (1953); and Flood v. Kuhn, 407 U.S. 258 , 92 S.Ct. 2099 , 32 L.Ed.2d 728 (1972), argued that these cases exempt from the antitrust laws the entire business of baseball. 1995Turning to the antitrust claim, the defendants, relying on the United States Supreme Court decisions supporting baseball's exemption from antitrust laws, Federal Base Ball Club of Baltimore v. National League, 259 U.S. 200 , 42 S.Ct. 465 , 66 L.Ed. 898 (1922); Toolson v. New York Yankees, Inc., 346 U.S. 356 , 74 S.Ct. 78 , 98 L.Ed. 64 (1953); and Flood v. Kuhn, 407 U.S. 258 , 92 S.Ct. 2099 , 32 L.Ed.2d 728 (1972), argued that these cases exempt from the antitrust laws the entire business of baseball.	1	1995–1995
Toolson v. New York Yankees, Inc. green scotus · 1953 2 sentences 1995Turning to the antitrust claim, the defendants, relying on the United States Supreme Court decisions supporting baseball's exemption from antitrust laws, Federal Base Ball Club of Baltimore v. National League, 259 U.S. 200 , 42 S.Ct. 465 , 66 L.Ed. 898 (1922); Toolson v. New York Yankees, Inc., 346 U.S. 356 , 74 S.Ct. 78 , 98 L.Ed. 64 (1953); and Flood v. Kuhn, 407 U.S. 258 , 92 S.Ct. 2099 , 32 L.Ed.2d 728 (1972), argued that these cases exempt from the antitrust laws the entire business of baseball. 1995Turning to the antitrust claim, the defendants, relying on the United States Supreme Court decisions supporting baseball's exemption from antitrust laws, Federal Base Ball Club of Baltimore v. National League, 259 U.S. 200 , 42 S.Ct. 465 , 66 L.Ed. 898 (1922); Toolson v. New York Yankees, Inc., 346 U.S. 356 , 74 S.Ct. 78 , 98 L.Ed. 64 (1953); and Flood v. Kuhn, 407 U.S. 258 , 92 S.Ct. 2099 , 32 L.Ed.2d 728 (1972), argued that these cases exempt from the antitrust laws the entire business of baseball.	1	1995–1995
Flood v. Kuhn green scotus · 1972 2 sentences 1995Turning to the antitrust claim, the defendants, relying on the United States Supreme Court decisions supporting baseball's exemption from antitrust laws, Federal Base Ball Club of Baltimore v. National League, 259 U.S. 200 , 42 S.Ct. 465 , 66 L.Ed. 898 (1922); Toolson v. New York Yankees, Inc., 346 U.S. 356 , 74 S.Ct. 78 , 98 L.Ed. 64 (1953); and Flood v. Kuhn, 407 U.S. 258 , 92 S.Ct. 2099 , 32 L.Ed.2d 728 (1972), argued that these cases exempt from the antitrust laws the entire business of baseball. 1995Turning to the antitrust claim, the defendants, relying on the United States Supreme Court decisions supporting baseball's exemption from antitrust laws, Federal Base Ball Club of Baltimore v. National League, 259 U.S. 200 , 42 S.Ct. 465 , 66 L.Ed. 898 (1922); Toolson v. New York Yankees, Inc., 346 U.S. 356 , 74 S.Ct. 78 , 98 L.Ed. 64 (1953); and Flood v. Kuhn, 407 U.S. 258 , 92 S.Ct. 2099 , 32 L.Ed.2d 728 (1972), argued that these cases exempt from the antitrust laws the entire business of baseball.	1	1995–1995
Piazza v. Major League Baseball green paed · 1993 1 sentence 1995The trial judge thoroughly reviewed those cases and a more recent case pertinent to the antitrust cause of action, Piazza v. Major League Baseball, 831 F. Supp. 420 (E.D.Pa. 1993).	1	1995–1995
Socarras v. Claughton Hotels, Inc. green fladistctapp · 1979 1 sentence 1993Compare Green v. Royal Palm Beach Colony, Inc., 292 So.2d 388 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974) (letter which merely stated that plaintiff would be employed by the defendant during the seasonal months of its business for three years did not contain the essential terms of the employment contract with the degree of certainty by which they could be known or understood without recourse to parole evidence and therefore did not satisfy the statute of frauds); Socarras v. Claughton Hotels, Inc., 374 So.2d 1057 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 385 So.2d 760 (Fla.1980) (note signed by vender which failed to identify	1	1993–1993
Williams v. Kleaveland green miwd · 1981 1 sentence 1985Our approach is consistent with the "purpose based approach" which is suggested by the foregoing article to resolve antitrust cases of this kind and which the authors believe would "promote important public policies" and yet at the same time "serve the central antitrust policies." Kissam, supra, at pp. 659-63, 670. "[P]roof that Defendants acted for the primary purpose of maintaining high quality patient care is a persuasive defense to an antitrust claim." Williams v. Kleaveland, 534 F. Supp. at 919 .	1	1985–1985
White v. Exchange Corp. green fladistctapp · 1964 1 sentence 1984White v. Exchange Corporation, 167 So.2d 324 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964); Pulsnation Enterprises, Inc. v. Appliance Plan Company, 141 So.2d 814 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962).	1	1984–1984
Scherer & Sons, Inc. v. INTERNATIONAL LADIES'G. WKRS. neutral fla · 1962 1 sentence 1984Value will be established at original purchase price.” Turning now to the judgment of the counterclaim we reverse, first, because the damages sought were recovered under a theory that would be supportable only as an antitrust violation, which is the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal courts, International Ladies Garment Workers Union v. Scherer & Sons, Inc., 132 So.2d 359 (Fla. 3d DCA 1961), approved Scherer & Sons, Inc. v. International Ladies Garment Workers Union, 142 So.2d 290 (Fla.1962); Freeman v. Bee Machine Company, Inc., 319 U.S. 448 , 63 S.Ct. 1146 , 87 L.Ed. 1509 (1943); Blumenst	1	1984–1984
Blumenstock Bros. Advertising Agency v. Curtis Publishing Co. green scotus · 1920 2 sentences 1984Value will be established at original purchase price.” Turning now to the judgment of the counterclaim we reverse, first, because the damages sought were recovered under a theory that would be supportable only as an antitrust violation, which is the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal courts, International Ladies Garment Workers Union v. Scherer & Sons, Inc., 132 So.2d 359 (Fla. 3d DCA 1961), approved Scherer & Sons, Inc. v. International Ladies Garment Workers Union, 142 So.2d 290 (Fla.1962); Freeman v. Bee Machine Company, Inc., 319 U.S. 448 , 63 S.Ct. 1146 , 87 L.Ed. 1509 (1943); Blumenst 1984Value will be established at original purchase price.” Turning now to the judgment of the counterclaim we reverse, first, because the damages sought were recovered under a theory that would be supportable only as an antitrust violation, which is the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal courts, International Ladies Garment Workers Union v. Scherer & Sons, Inc., 132 So.2d 359 (Fla. 3d DCA 1961), approved Scherer & Sons, Inc. v. International Ladies Garment Workers Union, 142 So.2d 290 (Fla.1962); Freeman v. Bee Machine Company, Inc., 319 U.S. 448 , 63 S.Ct. 1146 , 87 L.Ed. 1509 (1943); Blumenst	1	1984–1984
Freeman v. Bee MacHine Co., Inc green scotus · 1943 2 sentences 1984Value will be established at original purchase price.” Turning now to the judgment of the counterclaim we reverse, first, because the damages sought were recovered under a theory that would be supportable only as an antitrust violation, which is the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal courts, International Ladies Garment Workers Union v. Scherer & Sons, Inc., 132 So.2d 359 (Fla. 3d DCA 1961), approved Scherer & Sons, Inc. v. International Ladies Garment Workers Union, 142 So.2d 290 (Fla.1962); Freeman v. Bee Machine Company, Inc., 319 U.S. 448 , 63 S.Ct. 1146 , 87 L.Ed. 1509 (1943); Blumenst 1984Value will be established at original purchase price.” Turning now to the judgment of the counterclaim we reverse, first, because the damages sought were recovered under a theory that would be supportable only as an antitrust violation, which is the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal courts, International Ladies Garment Workers Union v. Scherer & Sons, Inc., 132 So.2d 359 (Fla. 3d DCA 1961), approved Scherer & Sons, Inc. v. International Ladies Garment Workers Union, 142 So.2d 290 (Fla.1962); Freeman v. Bee Machine Company, Inc., 319 U.S. 448 , 63 S.Ct. 1146 , 87 L.Ed. 1509 (1943); Blumenst	1	1984–1984
International Ladies' Garment Workers Union v. Scherer & Sons, Inc. neutral fladistctapp · 1961 1 sentence 1984Value will be established at original purchase price.” Turning now to the judgment of the counterclaim we reverse, first, because the damages sought were recovered under a theory that would be supportable only as an antitrust violation, which is the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal courts, International Ladies Garment Workers Union v. Scherer & Sons, Inc., 132 So.2d 359 (Fla. 3d DCA 1961), approved Scherer & Sons, Inc. v. International Ladies Garment Workers Union, 142 So.2d 290 (Fla.1962); Freeman v. Bee Machine Company, Inc., 319 U.S. 448 , 63 S.Ct. 1146 , 87 L.Ed. 1509 (1943); Blumenst	1	1984–1984
Cox v. Cox neutral fladistctapp · 1962 1 sentence 1984White v. Exchange Corporation, 167 So.2d 324 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964); Pulsnation Enterprises, Inc. v. Appliance Plan Company, 141 So.2d 814 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962).	1	1984–1984

Where else courts name it

CA 55 (1968–2026) TX 26 (1980–2025) CT 22 (1975–2019) IL 15 (1983–2024) OH 12 (1993–2024) MN 12 (1984–2009) NY 12 (1954–2012) NC 11 (1996–2022) NJ 9 (1978–2005) AZ 9 (1986–2020) WI 9 (1988–2025) IA 9 (1989–2018) NM 9 (1980–2015) LA 8 (1983–2020) PA 7 (1982–2014) VT 6 (1988–2016) FL 6 (1984–2024) MA 5 (1982–2024) ME 5 (2001–2020) MO 5 (1987–2013) MD 5 (1978–2012) ID 4 (1982–2010) KS 4 (2006–2021) WA 4 (1981–2009) AL 4 (1999–2009) HI 4 (1999–2018) IN 4 (2002–2014) DE 3 (1980–2019) UT 3 (2001–2017) TN 2 (2001–2007) NE 2 (2004–2006) AK 2 (1993–2000) OR 2 (1978–1984) MI 2 (1980–1994) WV 2 (1992–2009) CO 2 (1982–1992) AR 2 (1988–1996)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check