as-applied takings claim (Florida) · Go Syfert
← Florida issues

as-applied takings claim in Florida

6 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 2001–2017 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Lost Tree Village Corp. v. City of Vero Beachgreen
fladistctapp · 2002 · cited in 2 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2010–2017
2 sentences

2017Reg'l Planning Comm'n v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City, 473 U.S. 172, 186 (1985)). "[A] landowner may not establish a taking before a land-use authority has the opportunity, using its own reasonable procedures, to decide and explain the reach of a challenged regulation." Id. at 620; see also Lost Tree, 838 So. 2d at 573 ("In order to succeed in stating an as-applied takings claim, Lost Tree must show that it obtained a final decision on the permitted use of the land . . . .").

2010Lost Tree Village, 838 So.2d at 573 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) (emphasis added) (citations omitted).

22
Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson Cityred
scotus · 1985 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017
1 sentence

2017Reg'l Planning Comm'n v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City, 473 U.S. 172, 186 (1985)). "[A] landowner may not establish a taking before a land-use authority has the opportunity, using its own reasonable procedures, to decide and explain the reach of a challenged regulation." Id. at 620; see also Lost Tree, 838 So. 2d at 573 ("In order to succeed in stating an as-applied takings claim, Lost Tree must show that it obtained a final decision on the permitted use of the land . . . .").

11
Palazzolo v. Rhode Islandgreen
scotus · 2001 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2002–2002
2 sentences

2002See, generally, Palazzolo, 533 U.S. at 622 , 121 S.Ct. 2448 ; Taylor v. Riviera Beach, 801 So.2d at 263 .

2002See, generally, Palazzolo, 533 U.S. at 622 , 121 S.Ct. 2448 ; Taylor v. Riviera Beach, 801 So.2d at 263 .

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
Collins v. Monroe County green
fladistctapp · 2008
2 sentences

2013On appeal, we reversed since the Landowners’ claims were “properly brought as as-applied challenges to the application of the Monroe County land use regulations to specific parcels of property.” Id. at 715 .

2013The trial court eventually granted summary judgment against the Landowners, finding that the “ ‘BUD petitions do not constitute the meaningful applications necessary to ripen an as-applied takings claim,’ and that, ‘the claims must be treated in this case as facial takings claims.’ ” Id. at 713 .

12013–2013
Shands v. City of Marathon green
fladistctapp · 2008
1 sentence

2010In Shands v. City of Marathon, 999 So.2d 718 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008), we stated that *935 An as-applied takings claim challenging the- application of a land use ordinance is not ripe until the plaintiff has obtained a final decision regarding the application of the regulations to the plaintiffs property.

12010–2010
Taylor v. City of Riviera Beach green
fladistctapp · 2001
1 sentence

2002See, generally, Palazzolo, 533 U.S. at 622 , 121 S.Ct. 2448 ; Taylor v. Riviera Beach, 801 So.2d at 263 .

12002–2002
CITY OF RIVIERA v. Shillingburg green
fladistctapp · 1995
1 sentence

2001As this court noted in Shillingburg , "Any analysis in an as-applied regulatory taking claim must start with the threshold question of ripeness: Has there been a final decision from the appropriate governmental entity as to the nature and extent of the development that will be permitted?" Shillingburg, 659 So.2d at 1180 .

12001–2001

Where else courts name it

FL 6 (2001–2017) CA 2 (2013–2013)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check