Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1975–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Crawford v. Washington
green
2 sentences2025Crawford, 541 U.S. at 50 . 2024Under the civil law rule, officers of the court would examine the witnesses before trial, and “[t]hese examinations [would be] read in court in lieu of live testimony[.]” Id. | 2 | 2024–2025 |
Brumley v. Dorner
green
2 sentences1989Id. at 504 , 83 So. at 914-15 . [5] There are several subsequent cases in which the First District Court of Appeal announced principles which appear consistent with the strict civil law rule. 1989Id. at 504 , 83 So. at 914-15 . [5] There are several subsequent cases in which the First District Court of Appeal announced principles which appear consistent with the strict civil law rule. | 2 | 1982–1989 |
Koger Properties, Inc. v. Allen
neutral
1 sentence1989Koger Properties, Inc. v. Allen, 314 So.2d 792 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975), cert. denied, 328 So.2d 842 (Fla. 1976); Hodge v. Justus, 312 So.2d 248 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); New Homes of Pensacola, Inc. v. Mayne, 169 So.2d 345 (Fla. 1st DCA 1964). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
New Homes of Pensacola, Inc. v. Mayne
neutral
1 sentence1989Koger Properties, Inc. v. Allen, 314 So.2d 792 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975), cert. denied, 328 So.2d 842 (Fla. 1976); Hodge v. Justus, 312 So.2d 248 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); New Homes of Pensacola, Inc. v. Mayne, 169 So.2d 345 (Fla. 1st DCA 1964). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Hodge v. Justus
neutral
1 sentence1989Koger Properties, Inc. v. Allen, 314 So.2d 792 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975), cert. denied, 328 So.2d 842 (Fla. 1976); Hodge v. Justus, 312 So.2d 248 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); New Homes of Pensacola, Inc. v. Mayne, 169 So.2d 345 (Fla. 1st DCA 1964). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Seminole County v. Mertz
green
1 sentence1987The trial court’s ruling is in effect an application of the reasonable use rule con cerning surface water. 1 Although the Fifth District Court of Appeal has alluded to it, see Mertz, 415 So.2d at 1289 , Florida courts have never accepted the reasonable use rule but have consistently followed the civil law rule. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Libby, McNeil & Libby v. Roberts
neutral
1 sentence1987Libby, McNeil & Libby v. Roberts, 110 So.2d 82 (Fla. 2d DCA 1959). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Taylor
neutral
1 sentence1987Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. v. Taylor, 87 F.Supp. 313 (E.D.Mo.1949). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Young v. Huffman
green
2 sentences1987E.g., Young v. Huffman, 77 S.D. 254 , 90 N.W.2d 401 (1958). 1987E.g., Young v. Huffman, 77 S.D. 254 , 90 N.W.2d 401 (1958). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Duval v. Thomas
green
1 sentence1975The Supreme Court of Florida in Duval, supra , adopted the civil law rule defining littoral rights in nonnavigable, natural lakes, which doctrine permits reasonable use of the entire water body by each individual owning a part of the water bed and denies to any one owner the right to fill or otherwise exclude other persons who also own part of the lake bed. | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.