Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1961–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Grappin v. Stategreen1 sentence2019See Bautista, 863 So. 2d at 1185 (finding that the legislature intended two convictions for two deaths resulting from a single collision in violation of a single DUI statute); Grappin v. State, 450 So. 2d 480, 483 (Fla. 1984) (finding that taking five firearms from the same place at the same time in violation of a single firearm theft statute could result in five convictions); McKnight, 906 So. 2d at 374 (holding that the unit of prosecution of a vehicular homicide statute is each victim). | 1 | 1 |
Bautista v. Stategreen1 sentence2019See Bautista, 863 So. 2d at 1185 (finding that the legislature intended two convictions for two deaths resulting from a single collision in violation of a single DUI statute); Grappin v. State, 450 So. 2d 480, 483 (Fla. 1984) (finding that taking five firearms from the same place at the same time in violation of a single firearm theft statute could result in five convictions); McKnight, 906 So. 2d at 374 (holding that the unit of prosecution of a vehicular homicide statute is each victim). | 1 | 1 |
McKnight v. Stategreen1 sentence2019See Bautista, 863 So. 2d at 1185 (finding that the legislature intended two convictions for two deaths resulting from a single collision in violation of a single DUI statute); Grappin v. State, 450 So. 2d 480, 483 (Fla. 1984) (finding that taking five firearms from the same place at the same time in violation of a single firearm theft statute could result in five convictions); McKnight, 906 So. 2d at 374 (holding that the unit of prosecution of a vehicular homicide statute is each victim). | 1 | 1 |
Whitehead v. Linkousgreen1 sentence2001See Hertz Corp., 351 So.2d at 706 . [13] The circumstances considered in Whitehead v. Linkous, 404 So.2d 377 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), further illustrate the medical malpractice analogy. | 1 | 1 |
Stuart v. Hertz Corp.green1 sentence2001See Hertz Corp., 351 So.2d at 706 . [13] The circumstances considered in Whitehead v. Linkous, 404 So.2d 377 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), further illustrate the medical malpractice analogy. | 1 | 1 |
Sivilla v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.green1 sentence1999See id. at 554. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Mims v. Reid
green
1 sentence1969Mims v. Reid, Fla.1957, 98 So.2d 498 , is the basic authority for the proposition that prior to payment of the collision claim it is part of the insured’s claim against the tortfeasor and cannot be split from his claim on account of personal injuries. | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Titus v. Emmco Insurance Company
green
1 sentence1969Titus v. Emmco Insurance Company, Fla. App.1959, 109 So.2d 781 , permitted the carrier to sue an insured who was erroneously frustrated in his effort to prove property damage in the trial court but did not appeal. | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Stein v. Darby
green
1 sentence1962While the language of the opinion in Stein v. Darby, Fla.1961, 134 So.2d 232 , purports to make the distinction for which it is cited in the majority opinion, the decision itself can be explained as one merely determining district court jurisdiction to entertain an appeal from a trial court order not actually passing on a constitutional issue, raised by motion to dismiss, but dismissing the complaint in a situation where the controverted statute might have been construed as insufficient to support the action because of the potential constitutional objection. 4 The district court in that case d | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Bryan v. Southern Pacific Company
green
2 sentences1961If it be true, as contended by plaintiff, that the deceased, when injured, was crossing defendant’s track, oblivious of the approach of a train, holding an open umbrella in such a manner as to obstruct his view of an approaching train, and a lookout stationed upon the rear of the car, in the exercise of reasonable diligence, could and would have discovered the plaintiff’s perilous situation in time to avert the collision by warnings, application of brakes, or otherwise, then the failure to put a lookout on the rear of such train was negligence on defendant’s part, contributing directly to the 1961If it be true, as contended by plaintiff, that the deceased, when injured, was crossing defendant’s track, oblivious of the approach of a train, holding an open umbrella in such a manner as to obstruct his view of an approaching train, and a lookout stationed upon the rear of the car, in the exercise of reasonable diligence, could and would have discovered the plaintiff’s perilous situation in time to avert the collision by warnings, application of brakes, or otherwise, then the failure to put a lookout on the rear of such train was negligence on defendant’s part, contributing directly to the | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad v. Williams
neutral
1 sentence1961If it be true, as contended by plaintiff, that the deceased, when injured, was crossing defendant’s track, oblivious of the approach of a train, holding an open umbrella in such a manner as to obstruct his view of an approaching train, and a lookout stationed upon the rear of the car, in the exercise of reasonable diligence, could and would have discovered the plaintiff’s perilous situation in time to avert the collision by warnings, application of brakes, or otherwise, then the failure to put a lookout on the rear of such train was negligence on defendant’s part, contributing directly to the | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.