Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1977–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Fraser v. State
green
2 sentences2017We reverse and remand for resentencing before a different judge, because the trial judge’s comments in this case are substantively indistinguishable from those we found to constitute fundamental error in Fraser v. State, 201 So. 3d 847 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016). 2017We reverse and remand for resentencing before a different judge, because the trial judge’s comments in this case are substantively indistinguishable from those we found to constitute fundamental error in Fraser v. State, 201 So.3d 847 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016). | 2 | 2017–2017 |
Williams v. State
green
1 sentence2000As to nonstatutory mitigation, the trial court found: (1) Randall's good jail conduct and courtroom demeanor (some weight); and (2) the possibility of Randall receiving consecutive life sentences for the two murders (not found, in light of the current statutory provision for a sentence of life imprisonment with no possibility of parole). [3] Randall claims in this appeal that: (1) the trial court erred in allowing the prosecution to introduce evidence of Randall's prior incidents of violence; (2) the trial court erred in allowing the prosecution to introduce evidence of Randall's flight from t | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Miller v. State
green
1 sentence1995Miller v. State, 573 So.2d 337 (Fla. 1991); Rojas v. State, 552 So.2d 914 (Fla. 1989). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Rojas v. State
green
1 sentence1995Miller v. State, 573 So.2d 337 (Fla. 1991); Rojas v. State, 552 So.2d 914 (Fla. 1989). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Bell v. State
green
1 sentence1979Bell v. State, 354 So.2d 1266 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), establishes that no such requirement exists under the present definition of the crime of robbery as contained in Sec. 812.13, Fla. Stat. (1975). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Williams v. State
green
1 sentence1977Williams v. State, 280 So.2d 518 (Fla.3d DCA 1973). | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.