Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 1991–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Sperdute v. Household Realty Corp.green2 sentences2025We further held that “it is reversible error for a trial court to deny a party an evidentiary hearing to which [the party] is entitled.” Regner, 71 So. 3d at 908 (quoting Sperdute v. Household Realty Corp., 585 So. 2d 1168, 1169 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)). 2024Fin., 165 So. 3d 834, 836 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (“Whether the trial court has complied with the guarantees of due process is subject to de novo review.” (quotation omitted)); Sperdute v. Household Realty Corp., 585 So. 2d 1168, 1169 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991) (“[T]he purpose of an evidentiary hearing is to allow a party to ‘have a fair opportunity to contest’ the factual issues . . . it is reversible error for a trial court to deny a party an evidentiary hearing to which he is entitled.” (citation omitted)). | 4 | 5 |
Montie Spano v. Wells Fargo Equipment Finance, a Division of Wells Fargo Bank f/k/a Greater Bay Capitalgreen1 sentence2024Fin., 165 So. 3d 834, 836 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (“Whether the trial court has complied with the guarantees of due process is subject to de novo review.” (quotation omitted)); Sperdute v. Household Realty Corp., 585 So. 2d 1168, 1169 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991) (“[T]he purpose of an evidentiary hearing is to allow a party to ‘have a fair opportunity to contest’ the factual issues . . . it is reversible error for a trial court to deny a party an evidentiary hearing to which he is entitled.” (citation omitted)). | 1 | 1 |
Malzahn v. Malzahngreen1 sentence2016As this Court explained in Sperdute v. Household Realty Corp., 585 So.2d 1168 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), “the purpose of an evidentiary hearing is to allow a party to ‘have a fair opportunity to contest’ the factual issues .... [I]t is reversible error for a trial court to deny a party an evidentiary hearing to which he is entitled.” Id. at 1169 (quoting Malzahn v. Malzahn, 541 So.2d 1359, 1360 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)). | 1 | 1 |
Avi-Isaac v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.green1 sentence2011Further, “ ‘ it is reversible error for a trial court to deny a party an evidentiary hearing to which [the party] is entitled.’ ” Avi-Isaac v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 59 So.3d 174, 177 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (quoting Sperdute v. Household Realty Corp., 585 So.2d 1168, 1169 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Regner v. Amtrust Bank
green
1 sentence2025We further held that “it is reversible error for a trial court to deny a party an evidentiary hearing to which [the party] is entitled.” Regner, 71 So. 3d at 908 (quoting Sperdute v. Household Realty Corp., 585 So. 2d 1168, 1169 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Burgess v. State
green
1 sentence2011Of course, “[njeither the submission of affidavits nor argument of counsel is sufficient to constitute an evidentiary hearing.” Id. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Southeast Mortgage Co. v. Andrews
neutral
1 sentence1991Southeast Mortgage Co. v. Andrews, 561 So.2d 33 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.