Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 1980–2024 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
MANUEL FERNANDEZ, etc. v. YORDALYS CRUZ, etc.green2 sentences2024See Fernandez v. Cruz, 341 So. 3d 410 , 414 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022) (“[T]he term ‘‘parties’ has been broadly interpreted to include more than just record parties – so that, for example, a person in privity with a record party, as well as a person who controls for his own interest a record party, may invoke the doctrine of res judicata or collateral estoppel.’ . . . [O]ne party may be said to be a privy of another where the right to recover is dependent upon the right of recovery of the plaintiff in the prior action.” (quoting West v. Kawasaki Motors Mfg. 2022So, while the term “parties” has been broadly interpreted to include more than just the record parties, to invoke the doctrine of res judicata or collateral estoppel, the non-party “must have an interest in the action such that she will be bound by the final judgment as if she were a party.” Id. at 414 (quoting Stogniew v. McQueen, 656 So. 2d 917, 920 (Fla. 1995)). | 1 | 2 |
West v. Kawasaki Motors Mfg. Corp.green2 sentences2024Corp., U.S.A., 595 So. 2d 92, 94 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992))); Pearce v. Sandler, 219 So. 3d 961, 967 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (“[T]he doctrine of res judicata not only bars issues that were raised, but it also precludes consideration of issues that could have been raised but were not raised in the first case.”); Nat’l Auto Serv. 2022In this vein, the term “‘parties’ has been broadly interpreted to include more than just record parties—so that, for example, a person in privity with a record party, as well as a person who controls for his own interest a record party, may invoke the doctrine of res judicata or collateral estoppel.” West, 595 So. 2d at 94 . | 1 | 2 |
Pearce III v. Sandlergreen1 sentence2024Corp., U.S.A., 595 So. 2d 92, 94 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992))); Pearce v. Sandler, 219 So. 3d 961, 967 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (“[T]he doctrine of res judicata not only bars issues that were raised, but it also precludes consideration of issues that could have been raised but were not raised in the first case.”); Nat’l Auto Serv. | 1 | 1 |
Stogniew v. McQueengreen1 sentence2022So, while the term “parties” has been broadly interpreted to include more than just the record parties, to invoke the doctrine of res judicata or collateral estoppel, the non-party “must have an interest in the action such that she will be bound by the final judgment as if she were a party.” Id. at 414 (quoting Stogniew v. McQueen, 656 So. 2d 917, 920 (Fla. 1995)). | 1 | 1 |
Seaboard Coast LR Co. v. Industrial Contracting Companygreen1 sentence1992See, e.g., Seaboard Coast Line R.R., 260 So.2d at 283 . | 1 | 1 |
Universal Const. Co. v. City of Fort Lauderdalegreen1 sentence1987See Universal Construction Company v. City of Fort Lauderdale, 68 So.2d 366 (Fla.1953). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
DeCancino v. Eastern Airlines, Inc.
green
1 sentence1980Under these circumstances it would be inequitable to bar Orange County from raising this defense even if the doctrine of res judicata or collateral estoppel applied, de Cancino v. Eastern Airlines, Inc., 283 So.2d 97 (Fla.1973). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.