Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1992–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hill v. Stategreen1 sentence2013See Hill, 477 So.2d at 555-56 . | 1 | 1 |
Club West v. Tropigas of Florida, Inc.green2 sentences1994Club West v. Tropigas of Florida, Inc., 514 So.2d 426, 427 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), rev. denied 523 So.2d 579 (Fla. 1988). 1994Club West v. Tropigas of Florida, Inc., 514 So.2d 426, 427 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), rev. denied 523 So.2d 579 (Fla. 1988). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Kline E. Goeders v. Thomas E. Hundley
green
2 sentences2007Id. 2007Id. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Strickland v. Washington
green
2 sentences2007Under Strickland , to demonstrate prejudice a defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability — one sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome — that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different. 466 U.S. at 694 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 . 2007Under Strickland , to demonstrate prejudice a defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability — one sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome — that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different. 466 U.S. at 694 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 . | 1 | 2007–2007 |
BRASS & SINGER v. United Auto. Ins. Co.
green
1 sentence2006Brass & Singer, P.A., 919 So.2d at 475 . | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Hamilton v. State
green
1 sentence1999The court applied the Singer principle in Hamilton v. State, 547 So.2d 630 (Fla. 1989). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Phillips v. State
green
2 sentences1992Singer, 109 So.2d at 22-24 . `Close cases involving challenge to the impartiality of potential jurors should be resolved in favor of excusing the juror rather than leaving doubt as to his or her impartiality.' Phillips v. State, 572 So.2d 16 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). 1992Singer, 109 So.2d at 22-24 . `Close cases involving challenge to the impartiality of potential jurors should be resolved in favor of excusing the juror rather than leaving doubt as to his or her impartiality.' Phillips v. State, 572 So.2d 16 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Noe v. State
green
2 sentences1992At the risk of undue repetition, we think that the guidelines for application of the Singer rule as stated in Noe, 586 So.2d at 378 , bear repeating again: In application of the rule, the following guidelines should be considered: (1) a juror's statement that he would render a verdict according to the evidence is not sufficient of itself to overcome what he has said about forming an opinion; (2) every juror should come to the investigation of a case free from any preconceived impression of it; (3) if there is doubt as to the juror's sense of fairness or his mental integrity, he should be excus 1992At the risk of undue repetition, we think that the guidelines for application of the Singer rule as stated in Noe, 586 So.2d at 378 , bear repeating again: In application of the rule, the following guidelines should be considered: (1) a juror's statement that he would render a verdict according to the evidence is not sufficient of itself to overcome what he has said about forming an opinion; (2) every juror should come to the investigation of a case free from any preconceived impression of it; (3) if there is doubt as to the juror's sense of fairness or his mental integrity, he should be excus | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Singer v. State
green
2 sentences1992Singer, 109 So.2d at 22-24 . `Close cases involving challenge to the impartiality of potential jurors should be resolved in favor of excusing the juror rather than leaving doubt as to his or her impartiality.' Phillips v. State, 572 So.2d 16 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). 1992Singer, 109 So.2d at 22-24 . `Close cases involving challenge to the impartiality of potential jurors should be resolved in favor of excusing the juror rather than leaving doubt as to his or her impartiality.' Phillips v. State, 572 So.2d 16 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.