Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 2015–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
O S Advertising Co. of Georgia, Inc. v. Rubingreen2 sentences2020S. Advertising Co. of Georgia v. Rubin, 267 Ga. 723, 724 (1) ( 482 SE2d 295 ) (1997) (party must file a discretionary application to challenge a city’s zoning decision). 2020S. Advertising Co. of Georgia v. Rubin, 267 Ga. 723, 724 (1) ( 482 SE2d 295 ) (1997) (party must file a discretionary application to challenge a city’s zoning decision). | 2 | 2 |
Lemcon USA Corp. v. Icon Technology Consulting, Inc.green2 sentences2025See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (8), (b); Lemcon USA Corp. v. Icon Technology Consulting, 301 Ga. 888, 892 ( 804 SE2d 347 ) (2017). 2025See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (8), (b); Lemcon USA Corp. v. Icon Technology Consulting, 301 Ga. 888, 892 ( 804 SE2d 347 ) (2017). | 1 | 1 |
Diversified Holdings, LLP v. City of Suwaneegreen2 sentences2023The Court answered the question in the affirmative, concluding that a ruling on a rezoning application is adjudicative in nature; pertinently 4 here, in doing so, the Court also characterized the local authority’s decision as “adjudicative in nature.” Id. at 604 (II). 2023Before turning to the merits of the appeal, the Supreme Court addressed the threshold “question of jurisdiction and appellate procedure,” asking “whether a party seeking to appeal a superior court ruling on an inverse condemnation action is required to file a discretionary application if that claim is based on a local board’s zoning decision.” (Emphasis supplied.) Id. at 600 (II). | 1 | 1 |
Ladzinske v. Allengreen2 sentences2016See Ladzinske, 280 Ga. at 265 (“[The] rationale for requiring a discretionary application does not apply where the person who seeks to appeal was not a party to the administrative proceedings, unless he had standing to participate therein, but purposely opted out at the administrative level.”). 2016See Ladzinske, 280 Ga. at 265 (“[The] rationale for requiring a discretionary application does not apply where the person who seeks to appeal was not a party to the administrative proceedings, unless he had standing to participate therein, but purposely opted out at the administrative level.”). | 1 | 1 |
Mitcham v. Blalockgreen2 sentences2015See Mitcham v. Blalock, 268 Ga. 644, 646-647 (4) ( 491 SE2d 782 ) (1997) (no application required when appeal of attorney fees under OCGA § 9-15-14 is part of a judgment that is otherwise directly appealable); see also OCGA § 5-6-34 (d). 2015See Mitcham v. Blalock, 268 Ga. 644, 646-647 (4) ( 491 SE2d 782 ) (1997) (no application required when appeal of attorney fees under OCGA § 9-15-14 is part of a judgment that is otherwise directly appealable); see also OCGA § 5-6-34 (d). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
West v. City of Albany
green
2 sentences2017Our recent decision in West v. City of Albany, 300 Ga. 743 ( 797 SE2d 809 ) (2017), however, construed the ante litem notice requirement in OCGA § 36-33-5 as limited to negligence cases brought against municipalities and specifically overruled Brownlow v. City of Calhoun, 198 Ga. App. 710 ( 402 SE2d 788 ) (1991), in which the Court of Appeals held that ante litem notice was required for a claim of inverse condemnation. 2017Our recent decision in West v. City of Albany, 300 Ga. 743 ( 797 SE2d 809 ) (2017), however, construed the ante litem notice requirement in OCGA § 36-33-5 as limited to negligence cases brought against municipalities and specifically overruled Brownlow v. City of Calhoun, 198 Ga. App. 710 ( 402 SE2d 788 ) (1991), in which the Court of Appeals held that ante litem notice was required for a claim of inverse condemnation. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Brownlow v. City of Calhoun
green
2 sentences2017Our recent decision in West v. City of Albany, 300 Ga. 743 ( 797 SE2d 809 ) (2017), however, construed the ante litem notice requirement in OCGA § 36-33-5 as limited to negligence cases brought against municipalities and specifically overruled Brownlow v. City of Calhoun, 198 Ga. App. 710 ( 402 SE2d 788 ) (1991), in which the Court of Appeals held that ante litem notice was required for a claim of inverse condemnation. 2017Our recent decision in West v. City of Albany, 300 Ga. 743 ( 797 SE2d 809 ) (2017), however, construed the ante litem notice requirement in OCGA § 36-33-5 as limited to negligence cases brought against municipalities and specifically overruled Brownlow v. City of Calhoun, 198 Ga. App. 710 ( 402 SE2d 788 ) (1991), in which the Court of Appeals held that ante litem notice was required for a claim of inverse condemnation. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.