Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 2003–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Miller v. Stategreen2 sentences2015In fact, Agent Barron could have testified that Appellant had admitted to being present at the crime scene and that *116 it was Appellant’s initial false statement to law enforcement that led to the arrest of Harris, who was held almost five months before being released. [Decisions about which witnesses to call at trial “are matters of trial strategy and tactics, and such strategic and tactical decisions do not amount to deficient performance unless they are so unreasonable that no competent attorney would have made them under similar circumstances.” Miller v. State, 296 Ga. 9, 12 ( 764 SE2d 8 2015In fact, Agent Barron could have testified that Appellant had admitted to being present at the crime scene and that *116 it was Appellant’s initial false statement to law enforcement that led to the arrest of Harris, who was held almost five months before being released. [Decisions about which witnesses to call at trial “are matters of trial strategy and tactics, and such strategic and tactical decisions do not amount to deficient performance unless they are so unreasonable that no competent attorney would have made them under similar circumstances.” Miller v. State, 296 Ga. 9, 12 ( 764 SE2d 8 | 1 | 1 |
Daniels v. Stategreen2 sentences2013Under these circumstances, Betancourt has failed to show that his trial counsel’s performance was deficient or that his defense was prejudiced as a result of his counsel’s conduct.39 38 Daniels v. State, 296 Ga. App. 795, 779 (5) (a) ( 676 SE2d 13 ) (2009) (punctuation omitted); King v. State, 287 Ga. App. 375, 378 (2) (b) ( 651 SE2d 496 ) (2007) (“The complaint of insufficient meetings with trial counsel is not dispositive, as there exists no magic amount of time which counsel must spend in actual conference with his client.” (punctuation omitted)). 39 See Daniels, 296 Ga. App. at 779-80 (5) 2013Under these circumstances, Betancourt has failed to show that his trial counsel’s performance was deficient or that his defense was prejudiced as a result of his counsel’s conduct.39 38 Daniels v. State, 296 Ga. App. 795, 779 (5) (a) ( 676 SE2d 13 ) (2009) (punctuation omitted); King v. State, 287 Ga. App. 375, 378 (2) (b) ( 651 SE2d 496 ) (2007) (“The complaint of insufficient meetings with trial counsel is not dispositive, as there exists no magic amount of time which counsel must spend in actual conference with his client.” (punctuation omitted)). 39 See Daniels, 296 Ga. App. at 779-80 (5) | 1 | 1 |
King v. Stategreen2 sentences2013Under these circumstances, Betancourt has failed to show that his trial counsel’s performance was deficient or that his defense was prejudiced as a result of his counsel’s conduct.39 38 Daniels v. State, 296 Ga. App. 795, 779 (5) (a) ( 676 SE2d 13 ) (2009) (punctuation omitted); King v. State, 287 Ga. App. 375, 378 (2) (b) ( 651 SE2d 496 ) (2007) (“The complaint of insufficient meetings with trial counsel is not dispositive, as there exists no magic amount of time which counsel must spend in actual conference with his client.” (punctuation omitted)). 39 See Daniels, 296 Ga. App. at 779-80 (5) 2013Under these circumstances, Betancourt has failed to show that his trial counsel’s performance was deficient or that his defense was prejudiced as a result of his counsel’s conduct.39 38 Daniels v. State, 296 Ga. App. 795, 779 (5) (a) ( 676 SE2d 13 ) (2009) (punctuation omitted); King v. State, 287 Ga. App. 375, 378 (2) (b) ( 651 SE2d 496 ) (2007) (“The complaint of insufficient meetings with trial counsel is not dispositive, as there exists no magic amount of time which counsel must spend in actual conference with his client.” (punctuation omitted)). 39 See Daniels, 296 Ga. App. at 779-80 (5) | 1 | 1 |
Johnson v. Californiagreen1 sentence2009See Johnson, 545 U. S. at 169 (noting “wide variety” of evidence that can be enlisted to make out prima facie case of discrimination). | 1 | 1 |
Robinson v. Stategreen1 sentence2008Robinson v. State, 277 Ga. at 75-76 (this Court accepts trial court’s findings of fact and credibility determinations unless they are clearly erroneous). | 1 | 1 |
Milner v. Stategreen2 sentences2003Milner v. State, 271 Ga. 578, 579 (2), 522 S.E.2d 654 (1999). 2003Milner v. State, 271 Ga. 578, 579 (2), 522 S.E.2d 654 (1999). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
North Carolina v. Alford
green
2 sentences2017On the morning of September 3, Appellant met with his mother and Culp to discuss the possibility of entering a negotiated guilty plea, and before the jury was brought out for opening statements, the parties announced that they had reached an agreement. 2 With the jury still waiting in the jury room, the trial court conducted a plea hearing, at which Appellant entered a guilty plea to felony murder pursuant to North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U. S. 25 ( 91 SCt 160 , 27 LE2d 162) (1970), and the State nolle prossed the other charges against him.1 Culp told the court that Appellant was entering the 2017On the morning of September 3, Appellant met with his mother and Culp to discuss the possibility of entering a negotiated guilty plea, and before the jury was brought out for opening statements, the parties announced that they had reached an agreement. 2 With the jury still waiting in the jury room, the trial court conducted a plea hearing, at which Appellant entered a guilty plea to felony murder pursuant to North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U. S. 25 ( 91 SCt 160 , 27 LE2d 162) (1970), and the State nolle prossed the other charges against him.1 Culp told the court that Appellant was entering the | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.