Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 2009–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Folsomgreen2 sentences2013(Citations and punctuation omitted; emphasis supplied.) State v. Folsom, 285 Ga. 11, 12-13 (1) ( 673 SE2d 210 ) (2009). 2013(Citations and punctuation omitted; emphasis supplied.) State v. Folsom, 285 Ga. 11, 12-13 (1) ( 673 SE2d 210 ) (2009). | 3 | 3 |
Atlanta Bread Co. International v. Lupton-Smithgreen2 sentences2021Control Sys., 303 Ga. App. at 667 (1); see also Atlanta Bread Co. Int’l v. Lupton-Smith, 285 Ga. 587, 589 (2) ( 679 SE2d 722 ) (2009) (“When such restraints [on trade] are found in franchise or distributorship agreements, our jurisprudence has held time and again that these restraints are subject to strict scrutiny, receiving the same treatment as noncompetition covenants found in employment contracts.”). 13 Am. 2021Control Sys., 303 Ga. App. at 667 (1); see also Atlanta Bread Co. Int’l v. Lupton-Smith, 285 Ga. 587, 589 (2) ( 679 SE2d 722 ) (2009) (“When such restraints [on trade] are found in franchise or distributorship agreements, our jurisprudence has held time and again that these restraints are subject to strict scrutiny, receiving the same treatment as noncompetition covenants found in employment contracts.”). 13 Am. | 1 | 1 |
AMERICAN CONTROL SYSTEMS, INC. v. Boycegreen2 sentences2021Control Sys., 303 Ga. App. at 667 (1); see also Atlanta Bread Co. Int’l v. Lupton-Smith, 285 Ga. 587, 589 (2) ( 679 SE2d 722 ) (2009) (“When such restraints [on trade] are found in franchise or distributorship agreements, our jurisprudence has held time and again that these restraints are subject to strict scrutiny, receiving the same treatment as noncompetition covenants found in employment contracts.”). 13 Am. 2021Control Sys., 303 Ga. App. at 667 (1) (“In resolving the issue, restrictive covenants are subject to three levels of judicial scrutiny: strict scrutiny, which applies to employment contracts; middle or lesser scrutiny, which applies to professional partnership agreements; and much less scrutiny, which applies to sale of business agreements.” (punctuation omitted)). 8 business, which receive much less scrutiny and may be blue-penciled.”12 And we have consistently held that “when parties execute separate contracts for the seller’s sale of the business and the seller’s subsequent employment and e | 1 | 1 |
Swartz Investments, LLC v. Vion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.green1 sentence2021Control Sys., 303 Ga. App. at 667 (1) (“In resolving the issue, restrictive covenants are subject to three levels of judicial scrutiny: strict scrutiny, which applies to employment contracts; middle or lesser scrutiny, which applies to professional partnership agreements; and much less scrutiny, which applies to sale of business agreements.” (punctuation omitted)). 8 business, which receive much less scrutiny and may be blue-penciled.”12 And we have consistently held that “when parties execute separate contracts for the seller’s sale of the business and the seller’s subsequent employment and e | 1 | 1 |
State v. Folsomgreen2 sentences2017State v. Folsom, 286 Ga. 105, 107-108 (1) ( 686 SE2d 239 ) (2009) (citations and punctuation omitted). 2017State v. Folsom, 286 Ga. 105, 107-108 (1) ( 686 SE2d 239 ) (2009) (citations and punctuation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
McAllister v. State
green
2 sentences2009McAllister v. State, 270 Ga. 224 (1) ( 507 SE2d 448 ) (1998). 2009McAllister v. State, 270 Ga. 224 (1) ( 507 SE2d 448 ) (1998). | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.