Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
50 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1931–2024 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Burruss v. Stategreen2 sentences2008See Burruss v. State, 20 S.W.3d 179, 186 (Tex. App.–Texarkana 2000, pet. ref’d). 2008See Burruss v. State , 20 S.W.3d 179, 186 (Tex. App.-Texarkana 2000, pet. ref'd). | 11 | 11 |
Ex Parte Wilsongreen2 sentences2021Ex parte Wilson, 716 S.W.2d 953, 956 (Tex. Crim. 2003Ex parte Wilson , 716 S.W.2d 953, 956 (Tex. Crim. | 4 | 5 |
Jackson v. Stategreen2 sentences2015Jackson v. State, 973 S.W.2d 954 (Tex. Crim. 2015Jackson v. State, 973 S.W.2d 954 (Tex. Crim. | 3 | 12 |
Johnny Melchor MacIas v. Stategreen2 sentences2024“The burden is on the appellant to overcome the presumption of regularity.” Macias v. State, 539 S.W.3d 410, 420 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2017, pet. ref’d). 11 Jones argues that there is no evidence that it is his signature that appears on the protective order, instead of some other person’s. 2022Macias v. State, 539 S.W.3d 410, 420 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2017, pet. ref'd). | 3 | 3 |
Crawford v. Stategreen2 sentences2004Because proper admonishment by the trial court creates a prima facie showing that a guilty plea was knowingly and voluntarily made, Crawford v. State, 890 S.W.2d 941, 944 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1994, no pet.), a heavy burden is placed on the appellant to overcome the presumption of regularity of the judgment and proceedings, Lee, 39 S.W.3d at 375 . 2004Because proper admonishment by the trial court creates a prima facie showing that a guilty plea was knowingly and voluntarily made, Crawford v. State , 890 S.W.2d 941, 944 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1994, no pet.), a heavy burden is placed on the appellant to overcome the presumption of regularity of the judgment and proceedings, Lee , 39 S.W.3d at 375 . | 3 | 3 |
Hernandez v. Stategreen2 sentences2001See Hernandez v. State, 885 S.W.2d 597, 601 (Tex.App.—El Paso 1994, no pet.). 1998Ex parte Wilson, 716 S.W.2d 953, 956 (Tex.Crim.App.1986); Hernandez v. State, 885 S.W.2d 597, 601 (Tex.App.-El Paso 1994, no pet.). | 2 | 2 |
Lee v. Stategreen2 sentences2024After receipt of such admonishments, “[t]he burden is on the appellant to overcome the presumption of regularity of the judgment and the proceedings.” Lee v. State, 39 S.W.3d 373, 375 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, no pet.). 2007Light , 15 S.W.3d at 107 . “ The burden is on the appellant to overcome the presumption of regularity of the judgment and the proceedings.” Lee , 39 S.W.3d at 375 ; accord Dusenberry , 915 S.W.2d at 949 . | 1 | 5 |
Dusenberry v. Stategreen2 sentences2017Id. 2007Light , 15 S.W.3d at 107 . “ The burden is on the appellant to overcome the presumption of regularity of the judgment and the proceedings.” Lee , 39 S.W.3d at 375 ; accord Dusenberry , 915 S.W.2d at 949 . | 1 | 3 |
Dunn v. Stategreen1 sentence2024We find our sister court’s reasoning in Dunn v. State instructive: [I]n light of the presumption of regularity of the Order and the absence of any evidence in the record showing that the signature on the Order did not belong to appellant, the signature on the Order is evidence that appellant signed the Order and certified that he was present at the hearing, received a copy of the Order in open court, and had knowledge of the issuance of the Order. 497 S.W.3d 113, 117 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2016, pet. ref’d). | 1 | 1 |
Jackson v. Stategreen1 sentence2001Jackson v. State , 877 S.W.2d 768, 771 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Strickland v. Washingtongreen2 sentences2001See Strickland, 466 U.S. at 690 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 ; Jackson v. State, 973 S.W.2d 954, 956 (Tex.Crim.App.1998). 2001See Strickland, 466 U.S. at 690 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 ; Jackson v. State, 973 S.W.2d 954, 956 (Tex.Crim.App.1998). | 1 | 1 |
Carr v. Stategreen1 sentence1993Wilson , 716 S.W.2d at 956 ; Carr v. State , 745 S.W.2d 51, 52 (Tex. App. --Houston [1st Dist.] 1987, no pet.) There is also a written waiver of counsel in the record. | 1 | 1 |
Tennison v. Stategreen2 sentences1986Tennison v. State, 327 S.W.2d 575, 576 (Tex.Cr.App.1959). 1986Tennison v. State, 327 S.W.2d 575, 576 (Tex.Cr.App.1959). | 1 | 1 |
Bergman v. Stategreen1 sentence1931See Ex parte Bergman, 60 Texas Crim. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Wright v. State
green
2 sentences2018Wright, 873 S.W.2d at 80 . 2018Wright, 873 S.W.2d at 80 . | 4 | 2010–2018 |
Tong v. State
green
2 sentences2003Id. 2001Id. | 2 | 2001–2003 |
Mosley v. State
green
2 sentences2003Id. 2003Id. | 2 | 2003–2003 |
Light v. State
green
1 sentence2007Light , 15 S.W.3d at 107 . “ The burden is on the appellant to overcome the presumption of regularity of the judgment and the proceedings.” Lee , 39 S.W.3d at 375 ; accord Dusenberry , 915 S.W.2d at 949 . | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.