Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Iowa opinions name it 1 courts 2021–2024 6 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Jonesgreen2 sentences2024State v. Bauler, 8 N.W.3d 892 , 913 (Iowa 2024) (Oxley, J., dissenting); see also Florida v. Jardines, 569 U.S. 1, 11 (2013) (“The Katz reasonable-expectations test . . . is unnecessary to consider when the government gains evidence by physically intruding on constitutionally protected areas.”); United States v. Jones, 565 U.S. 400, 409 (2012) (“[T]he Katz reasonable-expectation-of-privacy test has been added to, not substituted for, the common-law trespassory test.” (alteration in original)). 2024State v. Bauler, 8 N.W.3d 892, 913 (Iowa 2024) (Oxley, J., dissenting); see also Florida v. Jardines, 569 U.S. 1, 11 (2013) (“The Katz reasonable-expectations test . . . is unnecessary to consider when the government gains evidence by physically intruding on constitutionally protected areas.”); United States v. Jones, 565 U.S. 400, 409 (2012) (“[T]he Katz reasonable-expectation-of-privacy test has been added to, not substituted for, the common-law trespassory test.” (alteration in original)). | 3 | 6 |
Florida v. Jardinesgreen2 sentences2024State v. Bauler, 8 N.W.3d 892 , 913 (Iowa 2024) (Oxley, J., dissenting); see also Florida v. Jardines, 569 U.S. 1, 11 (2013) (“The Katz reasonable-expectations test . . . is unnecessary to consider when the government gains evidence by physically intruding on constitutionally protected areas.”); United States v. Jones, 565 U.S. 400, 409 (2012) (“[T]he Katz reasonable-expectation-of-privacy test has been added to, not substituted for, the common-law trespassory test.” (alteration in original)). 2024State v. Bauler, 8 N.W.3d 892, 913 (Iowa 2024) (Oxley, J., dissenting); see also Florida v. Jardines, 569 U.S. 1, 11 (2013) (“The Katz reasonable-expectations test . . . is unnecessary to consider when the government gains evidence by physically intruding on constitutionally protected areas.”); United States v. Jones, 565 U.S. 400, 409 (2012) (“[T]he Katz reasonable-expectation-of-privacy test has been added to, not substituted for, the common-law trespassory test.” (alteration in original)). | 3 | 3 |
State of Iowa v. Kyra Rose Baulergreen2 sentences2024State v. Bauler, 8 N.W.3d 892 , 913 (Iowa 2024) (Oxley, J., dissenting); see also Florida v. Jardines, 569 U.S. 1, 11 (2013) (“The Katz reasonable-expectations test . . . is unnecessary to consider when the government gains evidence by physically intruding on constitutionally protected areas.”); United States v. Jones, 565 U.S. 400, 409 (2012) (“[T]he Katz reasonable-expectation-of-privacy test has been added to, not substituted for, the common-law trespassory test.” (alteration in original)). 2024State v. Bauler, 8 N.W.3d 892, 913 (Iowa 2024) (Oxley, J., dissenting); see also Florida v. Jardines, 569 U.S. 1, 11 (2013) (“The Katz reasonable-expectations test . . . is unnecessary to consider when the government gains evidence by physically intruding on constitutionally protected areas.”); United States v. Jones, 565 U.S. 400, 409 (2012) (“[T]he Katz reasonable-expectation-of-privacy test has been added to, not substituted for, the common-law trespassory test.” (alteration in original)). | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.