touchstone of the due-process analysis (Iowa) · Go Syfert
← Iowa issues

touchstone of the due-process analysis in Iowa

6 Iowa opinions name it 1 courts 2014–2016 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Viasystems, Inc. v. EBM-Papst St. Georgen GmbH & Co., KGgreen
ca8 · 2011 · cited in 4 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2014–2015
2 sentences

2015Georgen GmbH & Co., KG, 646 F. 3d 589, 594 (8th Cir. 2011)).

2015Georgen GmbH & Co., KG, 646 F. 3d 589, 594 (8th Cir. 2011)).

44
A. David Ostrem, Sr. v. Prideco Secure Loan Fund, Lpgreen
iowa · 2014 · cited in 5 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2015–2016
2 sentences

2016“The touchstone of the due-process analysis remains whether the defendant has sufficient ‘minimum contacts with [the forum state] such that the maintenance of the suit does not offend “traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.” ’ ” Id. (alteration in original) (quoting Ostrem v. Prideco Secure Loan Fund, LP, 841 N.W.2d 882, 891 (Iowa 2014)).

2016“The touchstone of the due-process analysis remains whether the defendant has sufficient ‘minimum contacts with [the forum state] such that the maintenance of-the suit does not offend “traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.” ’ ” Id. (alteration in original) (quoting Ostrem v. Prideco Secure Loan Fund, LP, 841 N.W.2d 882, 891 (Iowa 2014)).

25
International Shoe Co. v. Washingtongreen
scotus · 1945 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
2 sentences

2014Georgen GmbH & Co., KG, 646 F.3d 589, 594 (8th Cir.2011) (quoting Int'l Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310, 316 , 66 S.Ct. 154, 158 , 90 L.Ed. 95, 102 (1945)).

2014Georgen GmbH & Co., KG, 646 F.3d 589, 594 (8th Cir.2011) (quoting Int'l Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310, 316 , 66 S.Ct. 154, 158 , 90 L.Ed. 95, 102 (1945)).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
Sioux Pharm, Inc. and Sioux Biochemical, Inc. v. Summit Nutritionals International, Inc. green
iowa · 2015
2 sentences

2016“The touchstone of the due-process analysis remains whether the defendant has sufficient ‘minimum contacts with [the forum state] such that the maintenance of the suit does not offend “traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.” ’ ” Id. (alteration in original) (quoting Ostrem v. Prideco Secure Loan Fund, LP, 841 N.W.2d 882, 891 (Iowa 2014)).

2016“The touchstone of the due-process analysis remains whether the defendant has sufficient ‘minimum contacts with [the forum state] such that the maintenance of-the suit does not offend “traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.” ’ ” Id. (alteration in original) (quoting Ostrem v. Prideco Secure Loan Fund, LP, 841 N.W.2d 882, 891 (Iowa 2014)).

22016–2016
Samir M. Shams v. Sona Hassan green
iowa · 2013
1 sentence

2015Georgen GmbH & Co., KG, 646 F.3d 589, 594 (8th Cir.2011)). *189 “Fairness is the crux of the minimum-contacts analysis.” Shams, 829 N.W.2d at 854 .

12015–2015

Statutes the citing opinions construe

IA § Iowa Code § 617.3 (3) USC § 15u.s.c.1051 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check