four prong test (Idaho) · Go Syfert
← Idaho issues

four prong test in Idaho

6 Idaho opinions name it 1 courts 1993–2025 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Lunneborg v. My Fun Life, Corp.green
idaho · 2018 · cited in 2 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 2019–2021
2 sentences

2021To determine whether the district court abused its discretion, this Court applies a four- prong test: whether the trial court “(1) correctly perceived the issue as one of discretion; (2) acted within the outer boundaries of its discretion; (3) acted consistently with the legal standards applicable to the specific choices available to it; and (4) reached its decision by the exercise of reason.” Lunneborg v. My Fun Life, 163 Idaho 856 , 867, 421 P.3d 187, 198 (2018).

2019Lunneborg v. My Fun Life, 163 Idaho 856 , 867, 421 P.3d 187, 198 (2018).

22
J.R. Simplot Company, Inc. v. Idaho State Tax Commissiongreen
idaho · 1991 · cited in 3 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 1993–2025
2 sentences

1993Simplot Co. v. Tax Com’n, 120 Idaho 849 , 820 P.2d 1206 (1991), this Court adopted a four prong test for determining the appropriate level of deference to be given to an agency’s construction of a statute.

1993Simplot Co. v. Tax Com’n, 120 Idaho 849 , 820 P.2d 1206 (1991), this Court adopted a four prong test for determining the appropriate level of deference to be given to an agency’s construction of a statute.

13
Garner v. Horkley Oilgreen
idaho · 1993 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 1997–1997
2 sentences

1997Garner v. Horkley Oil, 123 Idaho 831, 833 , 853 P.2d 576, 578 (1993) (citing Simplot, 120 Idaho at 862 , 820 P.2d at 1219 ).

1997Garner v. Horkley Oil, 123 Idaho 831, 833 , 853 P.2d 576, 578 (1993) (citing Simplot, 120 Idaho at 862 , 820 P.2d at 1219 ).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
Hinman v. Morrison-Knudsen Co., Inc. green
idaho · 1989
1 sentence

1999After eliminating the first three prongs, this Court stated: “[W]e are unable to disagree with the trial court, and cannot hold that plaintiff was not prejudiced by the misconduct of the bailiff.” Id. at 872, 771 P.2d at 536 .

11999–1999

Statutes the citing opinions construe

ID § Idaho Code § 12-121 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

PA 29 (1978–2026) NJ 10 (1991–2021) CT 9 (1987–2015) TN 9 (1997–2010) ID 6 (1993–2025) OH 4 (2002–2014) LA 4 (2004–2016) VA 4 (1994–2012) FL 3 (1993–2002) CO 3 (1989–2025) MS 3 (1990–2002) TX 3 (1982–2013) MN 2 (1988–1995) GA 2 (2013–2018) CA 2 (2015–2015) NV 2 (1985–1985) NY 2 (1991–2007) MO 2 (1996–2008)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check