Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1983–1991 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ada County Highway District ex rel. Fairbanks v. Acarrequigreen2 sentences1991Ada County Highway District v. Acarrequi, 105 Idaho 873, 874-875 , 673 P.2d 1067, 1068 (1983) ("The allowance of amendment to pleadings is a matter not to be disturbed absent a showing of clear error.... 1991Ada County Highway District v. Acarrequi, 105 Idaho 873, 874-875 , 673 P.2d 1067, 1068 (1983) ("The allowance of amendment to pleadings is a matter not to be disturbed absent a showing of clear error.... | 1 | 2 |
Jones v. Watsongreen2 sentences1991A court may, in its discretion, allow such amendment, unless to do so would deprive the complaining party of some substantial right."); Jones v. Watson, 98 Idaho 606, 610 , 570 P.2d 284, 289 (1977) ("As this case had been set for trial at the time of defendant's attempt to amend the answer, leave of the court was prerequisite to amendment. 1991A court may, in its discretion, allow such amendment, unless to do so would deprive the complaining party of some substantial right."); Jones v. Watson, 98 Idaho 606, 610 , 570 P.2d 284, 289 (1977) ("As this case had been set for trial at the time of defendant's attempt to amend the answer, leave of the court was prerequisite to amendment. | 1 | 1 |
R.D. Bischoff v. Quong-Watkins Propertiesgreen2 sentences1991See Bischoff, 113 Idaho at 828 , 748 P.2d at 412 . 1991See Bischoff, 113 Idaho at 828 , 748 P.2d at 412 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Wheeler v. McIntyre
green
2 sentences1984Ada County Highway District v. Acarrequi, 105 Idaho 873 , 673 P.2d 1067 (1983); Wheeler v. McIntyre, 100 Idaho 286 , 596 P.2d 798 (1979). 1984Ada County Highway District v. Acarrequi, 105 Idaho 873 , 673 P.2d 1067 (1983); Wheeler v. McIntyre, 100 Idaho 286 , 596 P.2d 798 (1979). | 3 | 1983–1984 |
Cougar Bay Co., Inc. v. Bristol
green
2 sentences1983Wheeler v. McIntyre, 100 Idaho 286 , 596 P.2d 798 (1979); Cougar Bay Co. v. Bristol, 100 Idaho 380 , 597 P.2d 1070 (1979). 1983Wheeler v. McIntyre, 100 Idaho 286 , 596 P.2d 798 (1979); Cougar Bay Co. v. Bristol, 100 Idaho 380 , 597 P.2d 1070 (1979). | 2 | 1983–1983 |
Jensen v. Westberg
green
2 sentences1991I.R.C.P. 52(a); USA Fertilizer, Inc. v. Idaho First Nat’l Bank, 120 Idaho 271 , 815 P.2d 469 (Ct.App.1991); Jensen v. Westberg, 109 Idaho 379 , 707 P.2d 490 (Ct.App.1985). 1991I.R.C.P. 52(a); USA Fertilizer, Inc. v. Idaho First Nat’l Bank, 120 Idaho 271 , 815 P.2d 469 (Ct.App.1991); Jensen v. Westberg, 109 Idaho 379 , 707 P.2d 490 (Ct.App.1985). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
USA Fertilizer, Inc. v. Idaho First National Bank
green
2 sentences1991I.R.C.P. 52(a); USA Fertilizer, Inc. v. Idaho First Nat’l Bank, 120 Idaho 271 , 815 P.2d 469 (Ct.App.1991); Jensen v. Westberg, 109 Idaho 379 , 707 P.2d 490 (Ct.App.1985). 1991I.R.C.P. 52(a); USA Fertilizer, Inc. v. Idaho First Nat’l Bank, 120 Idaho 271 , 815 P.2d 469 (Ct.App.1991); Jensen v. Westberg, 109 Idaho 379 , 707 P.2d 490 (Ct.App.1985). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.