6 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Sterleygreen2 sentences1997On appeal, we applied the temporal test originally set forth in State v. Sterley, 112 Idaho 1097, 1099-1101 , 739 P.2d 396, 398-400 (1987). 1997On appeal, we applied the temporal test originally set forth in State v. Sterley, 112 Idaho 1097, 1099-1101 , 739 P.2d 396, 398-400 (1987). | 1 | 3 |
Neal v. State of Californiagreen2 sentences1990“Where a single act of violence is committed with an intent to harm more than one person [or] with means likely to harm more than one person, and results in multiple victims, multiple punishments are warranted and permitted.” State v. Major, 111 Idaho 410 , 415 n. 5, 725 P.2d 115 , 120 n. 5 (1986) (citing the rule in Neal v. State, 55 Cal.2d 11 , 9 Cal. Rptr. 607, 612 , 357 P.2d 839, 844 (1960) cert. denied 365 U.S. 823 , 81 S.Ct. 708 , 5 L.Ed.2d 700 (1961)). 1990“Where a single act of violence is committed with an intent to harm more than one person [or] with means likely to harm more than one person, and results in multiple victims, multiple punishments are warranted and permitted.” State v. Major, 111 Idaho 410 , 415 n. 5, 725 P.2d 115 , 120 n. 5 (1986) (citing the rule in Neal v. State, 55 Cal.2d 11 , 9 Cal. Rptr. 607, 612 , 357 P.2d 839, 844 (1960) cert. denied 365 U.S. 823 , 81 S.Ct. 708 , 5 L.Ed.2d 700 (1961)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
David Samples v. Dr. Ray W. Hanson
green
2 sentences2020In Samples, we found that an out-of-area doctor, hired to replace the defendant doctor twenty-two months after the allegedly negligent conduct, could serve as a local expert witness in that trial more than two years later. 5 Samples, 161 Idaho at 185 , 384 P.3d at 949 . 2020In Samples, we found that an out-of-area doctor, hired to replace the defendant doctor twenty-two months after the allegedly negligent conduct, could serve as a local expert witness in that trial more than two years later. 5 Samples, 161 Idaho at 185 , 384 P.3d at 949 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Chapman
green
2 sentences1998State v. Sterley, 112 Idaho 1097 , 739 P.2d 396 (1987); State v. Chapman, 112 Idaho 1011 , 739 P.2d 310 (1987); Smith, supra. A related series of events may be segregated into distinct acts if the acts are sufficiently separate in character and clear enough in sequence to be temporally distinguishable. 1998State v. Sterley, 112 Idaho 1097 , 739 P.2d 396 (1987); State v. Chapman, 112 Idaho 1011 , 739 P.2d 310 (1987); Smith, supra. A related series of events may be segregated into distinct acts if the acts are sufficiently separate in character and clear enough in sequence to be temporally distinguishable. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Grimes v. United States
green
1 sentence1990“Where a single act of violence is committed with an intent to harm more than one person [or] with means likely to harm more than one person, and results in multiple victims, multiple punishments are warranted and permitted.” State v. Major, 111 Idaho 410 , 415 n. 5, 725 P.2d 115 , 120 n. 5 (1986) (citing the rule in Neal v. State, 55 Cal.2d 11 , 9 Cal. Rptr. 607, 612 , 357 P.2d 839, 844 (1960) cert. denied 365 U.S. 823 , 81 S.Ct. 708 , 5 L.Ed.2d 700 (1961)). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
State v. Major
green
2 sentences1990“Where a single act of violence is committed with an intent to harm more than one person [or] with means likely to harm more than one person, and results in multiple victims, multiple punishments are warranted and permitted.” State v. Major, 111 Idaho 410 , 415 n. 5, 725 P.2d 115 , 120 n. 5 (1986) (citing the rule in Neal v. State, 55 Cal.2d 11 , 9 Cal. Rptr. 607, 612 , 357 P.2d 839, 844 (1960) cert. denied 365 U.S. 823 , 81 S.Ct. 708 , 5 L.Ed.2d 700 (1961)). 1990“Where a single act of violence is committed with an intent to harm more than one person [or] with means likely to harm more than one person, and results in multiple victims, multiple punishments are warranted and permitted.” State v. Major, 111 Idaho 410 , 415 n. 5, 725 P.2d 115 , 120 n. 5 (1986) (citing the rule in Neal v. State, 55 Cal.2d 11 , 9 Cal. Rptr. 607, 612 , 357 P.2d 839, 844 (1960) cert. denied 365 U.S. 823 , 81 S.Ct. 708 , 5 L.Ed.2d 700 (1961)). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
State v. Gallatin
green
2 sentences1987In State v. Gallatin, 106 Idaho 564 , 682 P.2d 105 (1984), the Court of Appeals applied the temporal test to a fact pattern similar to the instant action. 1987In State v. Gallatin, 106 Idaho 564 , 682 P.2d 105 (1984), the Court of Appeals applied the temporal test to a fact pattern similar to the instant action. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.