Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1903–1971 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Corder v. Cordergreen1 sentence1903See Corder v. Corder, 124 Ill. 229 ; Stephenson v. McClintock, 141 id. 604; Harris v. McIntyre, 118 id. 275; VanBuskirk v. VanBuskirk, 148 id. 9. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
White v. Metropolitan West Side Elevated Railroad
neutral
2 sentences1971For this reason alone it is apparent that the two parcels of land were not "inseparably connected in use." This brings the case clearly within the rule of The City of Chicago case, supra, and White v. Metropolitan West Side Elevated Railroad Co., supra , where the court commented, "But it is said, the two tracts of land were purchased to be used for one purpose, as one tract of land. 1971For this reason alone it is apparent that the two parcels of land were not “inseparably connected in use.” This brings the case clearly within the rule of The City of Chicago case, supra, and White v. Metropolitan West Side Elevated Railroad Co., supra, where the court commented, “But it is said, the two tracts of land were purchased to be used for one purpose, as one tract of land. | 2 | 1971–1971 |
Chicago Telephone Co. v. Northwestern Telephone Co.
green
1 sentence1917(Const. 1870, art. 4, sec. 10.) We think that the entries in the house journal, as shown by the petition, bring this case clearly within the rule stated, as aforesaid, in Dragovich v. Iroquois Iron Co. supra. From the entries in the house and senate journals as set forth in the petition it clearly appears that the bill known as Senate Bill No. 145, “An act to regulate the practice of dental surgery and dentistry in the State of Illinois, and to repeal certain acts therein named,” was introduced in the senate and passed. | 1 | 1917–1917 |
City of Elgin v. Eaton
green
1 sentence1916It was cited and the same principle applied in the case of City of Elgin v. Eaton, 83 Ill. 535 . | 1 | 1916–1916 |
Libby, McNeill & Libby v. Cook
green
1 sentence1912It is urged by appellant that the court having overruled the motion to direct the jury, made at the close of the plaintiff’s evidence, must have necessarily weighed the evidence in sustaining the motion at the close of all the evidence, and cites the case of Libby, McNeill & Libby v. Cook, 222 Ill. 206 . | 1 | 1912–1912 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.