Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 2008–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
FILO America, Inc. v. Olhoss Trading Co., LLCgreen2 sentences2008See Filo America, Inc., 321 F. Supp. 2d at 1269 . 2008See Filo America, Inc., 321 F. Supp. 2d at 1269 . | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Tower Investors, LLC v. 111 East Chestnut Consultants, Inc.
green
2 sentences2018The circuit court determined, however, that even if count II was a corporate veil piercing claim, the result would be the same, since a veil piercing claim has two prongs: “(1) there is such a unity of interest and ownership that the separate personalities of the corporation and the parties who compose it no longer exist, and (2) circumstances are such that adherence to the fiction of a separate corporation would promote injustice or inequitable circumstances.” Id. at 1033-34 . 2018The circuit court determined, however, that even if count II was a corporate veil piercing claim, the result would be the same, since a veil piercing claim has two prongs: “(1) there is such a unity of interest and ownership that the separate personalities of the corporation and the parties who compose it no longer exist, and (2) circumstances are such that adherence to the fiction of a separate corporation would promote injustice or inequitable circumstances.” Id. at 1033-34 . | 3 | 2017–2018 |
Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp. v. Abbas Holding I
green
1 sentence2020Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp., 2012 IL App (1st) 111296, ¶ 16 . ¶ 112 In the motion to reconsider, Willow argued that the trial court erred in declining to pierce the corporate veil of Illinois Concrete in light of all the factors of the corporate veil-piercing test in counts I, IV, and V under the totality of the evidence. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.