Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1980–2024 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Addisongreen2 sentences2024People v. Nesbitt, 2023 IL App (1st) 211301, ¶ 42 ; see also People v. Bolden, 2024 IL App (1st) 171479 -UB, ¶¶ 37, 43-44 (holding that the merits of pro se claims are relevant in determining whether a defendant has rebutted the presumption of reasonable assistance and distinguishing Addison, 2023 IL 127119 ); Ill. S. Ct. R. 23(e)(1) (eff. 2023Addison, 2023 IL 127119, ¶ 34 . | 1 | 2 |
People v. Profitgreen1 sentence2023Profit, 2012 IL App (1st) 101307, ¶¶ 19, 23 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Macias
green
2 sentences2016A reviewing court decides de novo (People v. Hale, 2013 IL 113140, ¶ 15 , 996 N.E.2d 607 ; People v. Morris, 2013 IL App (1st) 111251, ¶ 116 , 997 N.E.2d 847 ) whether a defendant has rebutted the presumption that refraining from objecting could be considered, under the circumstances, to be a sound trial strategy (People v. Macias, 2015 IL App (1st) 132039, ¶ 82 , 36 N.E.3d 373 ). ¶ 117 A logical preliminary question would be whether the statements Johnny Price, Matthew Price, and Renee Strohl made to the police were indeed objectionable under the rules of evidence, since professionally reason 2016A reviewing court decides de novo (People v. Hale, 2013 IL 113140, ¶ 15 , 996 N.E.2d 607 ; People v. Morris, 2013 IL App (1st) 111251, ¶ 116 , 997 N.E.2d 847 ) whether a defendant has rebutted the presumption that refraining from objecting could be considered, under the circumstances, to be a sound trial strategy (People v. Macias, 2015 IL App (1st) 132039, ¶ 82 , 36 N.E.3d 373 ). ¶ 117 A logical preliminary question would be whether the statements Johnny Price, Matthew Price, and Renee Strohl made to the police were indeed objectionable under the rules of evidence, since professionally reason | 2 | 2016–2016 |
People v. Nieves
green
2 sentences2016See People v. Nieves, 193 Ill. 2d 513, 527 , 739 N.E.2d 1277, 1284 (2000) (no ineffective assistance if "any objection *** would rightfully have been overruled"). 2016See People v. Nieves, 193 Ill. 2d 513, 527 , 739 N.E.2d 1277, 1284 (2000) (no ineffective assistance if "any objection *** would rightfully have been overruled"). | 2 | 2016–2016 |
People v. Morris
green
2 sentences2016A reviewing court decides de novo (People v. Hale, 2013 IL 113140, ¶ 15 , 996 N.E.2d 607 ; People v. Morris, 2013 IL App (1st) 111251, ¶ 116 , 997 N.E.2d 847 ) whether a defendant has rebutted the presumption that refraining from objecting could be considered, under the circumstances, to be a sound trial strategy (People v. Macias, 2015 IL App (1st) 132039, ¶ 82 , 36 N.E.3d 373 ). ¶ 117 A logical preliminary question would be whether the statements Johnny Price, Matthew Price, and Renee Strohl made to the police were indeed objectionable under the rules of evidence, since professionally reason 2016A reviewing court decides de novo (People v. Hale, 2013 IL 113140, ¶ 15 , 996 N.E.2d 607 ; People v. Morris, 2013 IL App (1st) 111251, ¶ 116 , 997 N.E.2d 847 ) whether a defendant has rebutted the presumption that refraining from objecting could be considered, under the circumstances, to be a sound trial strategy (People v. Macias, 2015 IL App (1st) 132039, ¶ 82 , 36 N.E.3d 373 ). ¶ 117 A logical preliminary question would be whether the statements Johnny Price, Matthew Price, and Renee Strohl made to the police were indeed objectionable under the rules of evidence, since professionally reason | 2 | 2016–2016 |
People v. Hale
green
2 sentences2016A reviewing court decides de novo (People v. Hale, 2013 IL 113140, ¶ 15 , 996 N.E.2d 607 ; People v. Morris, 2013 IL App (1st) 111251, ¶ 116 , 997 N.E.2d 847 ) whether a defendant has rebutted the presumption that refraining from objecting could be considered, under the circumstances, to be a sound trial strategy (People v. Macias, 2015 IL App (1st) 132039, ¶ 82 , 36 N.E.3d 373 ). ¶ 117 A logical preliminary question would be whether the statements Johnny Price, Matthew Price, and Renee Strohl made to the police were indeed objectionable under the rules of evidence, since professionally reason 2016A reviewing court decides de novo (People v. Hale, 2013 IL 113140, ¶ 15 , 996 N.E.2d 607 ; People v. Morris, 2013 IL App (1st) 111251, ¶ 116 , 997 N.E.2d 847 ) whether a defendant has rebutted the presumption that refraining from objecting could be considered, under the circumstances, to be a sound trial strategy (People v. Macias, 2015 IL App (1st) 132039, ¶ 82 , 36 N.E.3d 373 ). ¶ 117 A logical preliminary question would be whether the statements Johnny Price, Matthew Price, and Renee Strohl made to the police were indeed objectionable under the rules of evidence, since professionally reason | 2 | 2016–2016 |
People v. Nesbitt
green
1 sentence2024People v. Nesbitt, 2023 IL App (1st) 211301, ¶ 42 ; see also People v. Bolden, 2024 IL App (1st) 171479 -UB, ¶¶ 37, 43-44 (holding that the merits of pro se claims are relevant in determining whether a defendant has rebutted the presumption of reasonable assistance and distinguishing Addison, 2023 IL 127119 ); Ill. S. Ct. R. 23(e)(1) (eff. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
People v. Martin
green
1 sentence1980(People v. Martin (1980), 87 Ill. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.