plaintiff to file claim (Illinois) · Go Syfert
← Illinois issues

plaintiff to file claim in Illinois

6 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1997–2006 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Szajna v. General Motors Corp.green
ill · 1986 · cited in 4 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2004–2006
2 sentences

2006App. 3d at 832 , citing Szajna v. General Motors Corp., 115 Ill. 2d 294, 311 (1986), and Rothe v. Maloney Cadillac, Inc., 119 Ill. 2d 288, 292 (1988).

2006App. 3d at 832 , citing Szajna v. General Motors Corp., 115 Ill. 2d 294, 311 (1986), and Rothe v. Maloney Cadillac, Inc., 119 Ill. 2d 288, 292 (1988).

24
William C. Ramsey and Johnny Ray King, Cross-Appellees v. James T. Leath, Dan Chandler and George Daly, Cross-Appellantsgreen
ca11 · 1983 · cited in 2 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 1997–1997
2 sentences

1997See Ramsey v. Leath, 706 F.2d 1166,1170-71 (11th Cir. 1983).

1997See Ramsey v. Leath , 706 F.2d 1166, 1170-71 (11th Cir. 1983).

22

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
Rothe v. Maloney Cadillac, Inc. green
ill · 1988
2 sentences

2006App. 3d at 832 , citing Szajna v. General Motors Corp., 115 Ill. 2d 294, 311 (1986), and Rothe v. Maloney Cadillac, Inc., 119 Ill. 2d 288, 292 (1988).

2006App. 3d at 832 , citing Szajna v. General Motors Corp., 115 Ill. 2d 294, 311 (1986), and Rothe v. Maloney Cadillac, Inc., 119 Ill. 2d 288, 292 (1988).

42004–2006
Mekertichian v. Mercedes-Benz U.S.A., L.L.C. green
illappct · 2004
2 sentences

2006“In order for a plaintiff to file a claim for economic damages under the UCC for the breach of an implied warranty, he or she must be in vertical privity of contract with the seller.” Mekertichian, 347 Ill.

2006AIn order for a plaintiff to file a claim for economic damages under the UCC for the breach of an implied warranty, he or she must be in vertical privity of contract with the seller.@ Mekertichian, 347 Ill.

22006–2006

Statutes the citing opinions construe

USC § 15u.s.c.2301 (3) USC § 15u.s.c.2310 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

IN 9 (2000–2016) IL 6 (1997–2006) CA 3 (2020–2022) NJ 2 (1992–2017)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check