res ipsa loquitur where such specific doctrine (Illinois) · Go Syfert
← Illinois issues

res ipsa loquitur where such specific doctrine in Illinois

6 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1980–2000 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
Kolakowski v. Voris green
ill · 1980
2 sentences

2000Rather, both the opinion of the expert witness as well as the inference of general negligence arising from the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur remain to be considered by the jury with all other evidence in the case. [Citation.] Our appellate court has consistently permitted a plaintiff to introduce evidence of specific negligence without depriving him of his right to rely on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur where such specific evidence does not conclusively establish the cause of the injury.” Kolakowski v. Voris, 83 Ill. 2d 388, 397 , 415 N.E.2d 397 (1980).

2000Rather, both the opinion of the expert witness as well as the inference of general negligence arising from the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur remain to be considered by the jury with all other evidence in the case. [Citation.] Our appellate court has consistently permitted a plaintiff to introduce evidence of specific negligence without depriving him of his right to rely on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur where such specific evidence does not conclusively establish the cause of the injury.” Kolakowski v. Voris, 83 Ill. 2d 388, 397 , 415 N.E.2d 397 (1980).

51987–2000
Collgood, Inc. v. Sands Drug Co. green
illappct · 1972
2 sentences

1980(Collgood, Inc. v. Sands Drug Co. (1972), 5 Ill.

1980Rather, both the opinion of the expert witness as well as the inference of general negligence arising from the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur remain to be considered by the jury with all other evidence in the case. ( Metz v. Central Illinois Electric & Gas Co. (1965), 32 Ill.2d 446, 449 .) Our appellate court has consistently permitted a plaintiff to introduce evidence of specific negligence without depriving him of his right to rely on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur where such specific evidence does not conclusively establish the cause of the injury. ( Collgood, Inc. v. Sands Drug Co. (1972

11980–1980
Erckman v. Northern Illinois Gas Co. green
illappct · 1965
1 sentence

1980App.3d 910 , *398 916; Erckman v. Northern Illinois Gas Co. (1965), 61 Ill.

11980–1980
Metz v. Central Illinois Electric & Gas Co. green
ill · 1965
2 sentences

1980(Metz v. Central Illinois Electric & Gas Co. (1965), 32 Ill. 2d 446, 449 .) Our appellate court has consistently permitted a plaintiff to introduce evidence of specific negligence without depriving him of his right to rely on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur where such specific evidence does not conclusively establish the cause of the injury.

1980Rather, both the opinion of the expert witness as well as the inference of general negligence arising from the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur remain to be considered by the jury with all other evidence in the case. ( Metz v. Central Illinois Electric & Gas Co. (1965), 32 Ill.2d 446, 449 .) Our appellate court has consistently permitted a plaintiff to introduce evidence of specific negligence without depriving him of his right to rely on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur where such specific evidence does not conclusively establish the cause of the injury. ( Collgood, Inc. v. Sands Drug Co. (1972

11980–1980

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check