Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1945–2008 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Battlesgreen2 sentences2008See People v. Battles, 311 Ill. 2008See People v. Battles, 311 Ill.App.3d 991, 997 , 244 Ill.Dec. 109 , 724 N.E.2d 997 (2000) ("The speedy trial statute enforces a constitutional right. | 2 | 2 |
People v. Van Dykgreen2 sentences2008App. 3d 275, 278 , 352 N.E.2d 327 (1976) (“The purpose of the salutory rule requiring a defendant to file a motion for a new trial which specifies the grounds in order to preserve issues for appeal is to allow the trial court to correct possible errors and thereby eliminate unnecessary reviews and reversals.”) Although we recognize defendant’s speedy trial claim is statutorily--not constitutionally–-based, defendant’s rights -8- 1-06-0924 under the statute are underpinned by his right to a speedy trial under both the Federal and Illinois Constitutions. 2008App. 3d 275, 278 , 352 N.E.2d 327 (1976) (“The purpose of the salutory rule requiring a defendant to file a motion for a new trial which specifies the grounds in order to preserve issues for appeal is to allow the trial court to correct possible errors and thereby eliminate unnecessary reviews and reversals”). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lawson v. Hill
green
2 sentences1990App. 3d 835 , 396 N.E.2d 617 , the court discussed these principles as follows: “[Wjhile recognizing that an amendment should not ordinarily be permitted to set up matters of which the pleader had full knowledge at the time of interposing the original pleading and no excuse is presented for not putting its substance in the original pleading, such an amendment will be allowed where justice is not served by denying leave to amend; doubts should be resolved in favor of allowing amendments. ‘The liberal policy of permitting amendments to pleadings is in accord with the salutory principle that cont 1990App. 3d 835 , 396 N.E.2d 617 , the court discussed these principles as follows: “[Wjhile recognizing that an amendment should not ordinarily be permitted to set up matters of which the pleader had full knowledge at the time of interposing the original pleading and no excuse is presented for not putting its substance in the original pleading, such an amendment will be allowed where justice is not served by denying leave to amend; doubts should be resolved in favor of allowing amendments. ‘The liberal policy of permitting amendments to pleadings is in accord with the salutory principle that cont | 2 | 1987–1990 |
Stevenson v. Maston
neutral
2 sentences1990App. 3d at 845 , 396 N.E.2d at 625 , quoting Stevenson v. Maston (1969), 107 Ill. 1987App. 3d 835, 845 , 396 N.E.2d 617, 625 , quoting Stevenson v. Maston (1969), 107 Ill. | 2 | 1987–1990 |
People v. Pickett
green
2 sentences1976(People v. Pickett, 54 Ill. 2d 280 , 296 N.E.2d 856 ; People v. Irwin, 32 Ill. 2d 441 , 207 N.E.2d 76 .) In the instant case defendant fulfilled the purpose of the rule through his numerous objections during the trial and his post-trial motion. 1976(People v. Pickett, 54 Ill. 2d 280 , 296 N.E.2d 856 ; People v. Irwin, 32 Ill. 2d 441 , 207 N.E.2d 76 .) In the instant case defendant fulfilled the purpose of the rule through his numerous objections during the trial and his post-trial motion. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
The People v. Irwin
green
2 sentences1976(People v. Pickett, 54 Ill. 2d 280 , 296 N.E.2d 856 ; People v. Irwin, 32 Ill. 2d 441 , 207 N.E.2d 76 .) In the instant case defendant fulfilled the purpose of the rule through his numerous objections during the trial and his post-trial motion. 1976(People v. Pickett, 54 Ill. 2d 280 , 296 N.E.2d 856 ; People v. Irwin, 32 Ill. 2d 441 , 207 N.E.2d 76 .) In the instant case defendant fulfilled the purpose of the rule through his numerous objections during the trial and his post-trial motion. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Wintersteen v. National Cooperage & Woodenware Co.
green
1 sentence1945(Wintersteen v. National Cooperage & Woodenware Co., 361 Ill. 95 .) The court erred in overruling the plaintiff’s motion and we, therefore, direct the court to ascertain the expenses and reasonable counsel fees incurred by the plaintiff in proving the facts referred to in plaintiff’s motion of June 3,1943, and to assess these additional amounts against the defendant Thomas Valos. | 1 | 1945–1945 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.